• Home
  • Aim of this blog

Dr.S.Venkatesan MD

Expressions in cardiology

Feeds:
Posts
Comments
« How to ship a dead heart . . . with an assured life on delivery ?
What is Interventional cardiology ? I don’t know , . . I am in pursuit of a curious new definition ! »

Evidence less cardiology : Is “No-flow” better than “No-reflow” in STEMI ?

January 26, 2019 by dr s venkatesan

Cath labs are probably the best place to practice preventive cardiology . . .

Practice of medicine is primarily guided by Infinite Information , plenty of Intuition, little bit of Intelligence and unquantifiable amount of Ignorance.The science of coronary reperfusion is standing example for variable mix of the above.The term no reflow is a jargan used liberally in cath labs right from first year fellow to super consultant without knowing what exactly they mean by it.

What really is No-reflow then ?

The academic definition :According to Kloner no-reflow is defined as suboptimal myocardial reperfusion through a part of coronary circulation without angiographic evidence of mechanical vessel obstruction.( Kloner RA, Ganote CE, Jennings RB. “The “no-reflow” phenomenon after temporary coronary occlusion in the dog.” Journal of Clinical Investigation, 1974; 54: 1496–1508.)

With due credits to his seminal paper, I always wonder what exactly Dr Kloner meant when he labelled it as No-reflow!

No is ok , Flow is ok , What does the adjective “re” mean to you ?

Re stands for repeat ? recurrent ? Yes , it may mean any one of it. It may mean nothing in many patients as their post PCI flow is same or found to be no better than pre PCI flow with no significant forward flow at all ! In this situation No-reflow is same as No-flow (Never flown ) in physiological terms irrespective of epicardial patency.

Literally, the term no re-flow tell us, there has been a dramatic procedure related*( or preexisting ) destabilization in distal blood flow. It can be any downgrading of basal TIMI flow. ( Example : TIMI 3 becoming Zero , or TIMI 1 becoming 3 then back to 1 or Zero.) The terms slow flow, low flow, stuttering or trickle of flow all fall under the common  category No reflow. In a crude manner one may conclude no reflow to be  masquereding term  for failed PCI.

*Mind you , No reflow can also occur with pharmacological lysis as well.(Less common)But personal experincee suggest it has a less benign course.

Mechanism of No- reflow

Many mechanisms has been proposed and disposed by experts. However , all suggested mechanisms end up in the final common theme ie micro vascular obstruction.

Can no-reflow precipitate a fresh ACS ?

Could be yes . How ? The distal thrombus migration clogs the active collateral channels at its entry point.This is probably the most unrecognised concept which is difficult to prove though.The problem is , we may not realise this as it could be silent or may just present as LV dysfunction , Infarct extension, or Ischemic cardiac failure.

Why is treatment of no reflow is so dismal ?

I think, by now you can guess the answer and get it right too !

Is no flow better than No-reflow?

It may seem a foolish question one could come across in coronary hemodynamics. The prevailing coronary doctrine, as we understand is , all ATOs need to be opened in STEMI in an emergent fashion. (Other wise patients or their myocardium can’t be salvaged )But, we also realise ATO do get converted to CTOs in a safe manner following a STEMI in a significant number. It’s the ultimate myocardial mystery when we realise even the ATO fails to damage the myocardium significantly in some patients.

Presence of acute collateralisation to IRA from non IRA is observed instantaneously and spreads rapidly towards myocardium in distress.It is observed in atleast 40% of all patients.(Ref 2,3).

The anatomical and physiological codecs of acute collaterals in ACS is secretly located close in the God’s domain.But, Interfering with it, is definitely in human domain.

Should we need to worry about the impact of PCI on these acute collaterals ?

It is estimated up to 5 grams of thrombus could spilled over to the distal coronary bed. Mind you thrombus formation is not a one time process.Can you guess where these thrombus lodge in ? We don’t know what is thrombus clearing capacity of LAD/LCX/RCA vascular bed. But. we have observed naturally formed thrombus is less likely to disseminate and migrate than the catheter and wire induced.My presumption is , coronaries show their dissent and disapproval in the only way they know, ie non stop generation of thrombus (Not withstanding our DAPT/2b 3a /Bivaluridins etc)

Acute collateral shutdown : A new concept

We are not sure if there is a collision between two streams of reperfusion that happens after a STEMI. One spontaneous from the collateral and other from antegrade(Either spontaneous or man made)

Is it benefitial, detrimental or neutral ? We don’t know the answer for sure. My understanding is some of subset of critical STEMI are heavily dependent on this life line however miniscule it may be.

It doesn’t require a double blinded study to prove what would happen when a hurried cardiologist attempt hurried PCI who often has to a change his target to thrombus instead of myocardium .

When aggression is shown on the thrombus, it’s more likely you end up in no reflow . One possible new mechanism(Proposed by the author) of No reflow is distal dissemination of thrombus debri that plugs the lateral entry points of collaterals.

This is the time , no reflow shows its violent face. Invariably hemodynamic deteriation occurs and the entire reperfusion team would seem to count their luck than expertise.

Can we perceive, predict and prevent this ?

We should , we need to , but how ? Since we know the true success rate of no reflow is miniscule, serious introspection to be done. Funnily (but realistically) one can take a famous cue from the most underrated medical specialty Social and preventive medicine .

Yes it’s “Prevention is better than cure” and mind you, if there is no cure, how important prevention becomes.Strangley , preventive cardiology is meant for lesser professionals , who and talk about diet, excercise and lifestyle.

No , it’s not . Preventive medicine needs a new defintion , rather new understanding .Its’ all about preventing an expected or unexpected adverse event anywhere.

How many of us really believe there is no effective cure for No-reflow and it is directly related to aggressive thrombus clearance strategies .

Should we argue new age Interventionists to practice preventive cardiology right inside the cath lab and do away with non-academic temptations.(Surprise , this is exactly mega trials on thrombus aspiration told us (Class 3 Indication for routine thrombus meddling)

Final message

Stable and comfortable, late ATOs need not be opened like defusing a time bomb. We will never know which side of the bomb the cardiologist is sitting.

The incidence of new onset No-reflow can be higher than what we presume.Further it can trigger a fresh ACS by whipping up the injured and resting myocardium.(Mostly attributed to late reperfusion Injury and the acute collateral shutdown.)

Postample and Counterpoint

As an interventional cardiologist, No-reflow is one among the expected complications , which are part of the profession.Never bother about these unscientific utterrings . That’s the job of critics. You go ahead and fight with the coronary artety in every case of ACS. Only weak minded unprofessionals would love to sit on a case of ACS and play a waiting game in CCU. True professionals shall look for multiple criminal targets beyond thrombus, myocardium, IRA , non IRA, doesn’t matter . Do it with confidence.Hope for the best, don’t bother too much about the endpoint.

Mind you, that’s what , we are trained and paid for and possibly respected too in this most glamorous subspecialty of Medicine.

Coming next

*Is Catheter, Guidewire Induced thrombus radically different from natural denovo thrombus ?

*How common is angiographically blind No reflow.(TIMI 3 with good and bad blush included)

*What are the residual defects and long term myocardial sequale ? (Inspite of successful tackling of No reflow )

Reference

1.Claire Bouleti et all The no-reflow phenomenon: State of the art Le no-reflow : état de l’artArchives of Cardiovascular Disease (2015) 108, 661—674
2.L YJ,Masuyama T,Mishima M, et al Effect of pre-reperfusion residual flow on recovery from myocardial stunning: a myocardial contrast echocardiography study. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2000;13:18–25. doi:10.1016/S0894-7317(00)90038-5

PubMed
3.Ha M, Sakata Y, Nakatani D on behalf of the OACIS Investigators, Sakata Y, Nakatani D on behalf of the OACIS Investigators, et al

Impact of coronary collaterals on in-hospital and 5-year mortality after ST-elevation myocardial infarction in the contemporary percutaneous coronary intervention era: a prospective observational study

BMJ Open 2016;6:e011105. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011105

Rate this:

Share this:

  • LinkedIn
  • WhatsApp
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Email

Like this:

Like Loading...

Related

Posted in Uncategorized |

  • Categories

  • Archives

    • June 2022 (2)
    • May 2022 (1)
    • April 2022 (2)
    • March 2022 (1)
    • February 2022 (3)
    • January 2022 (7)
    • December 2021 (3)
    • November 2021 (5)
    • October 2021 (8)
    • September 2021 (4)
    • August 2021 (6)
    • July 2021 (6)
    • June 2021 (7)
    • May 2021 (5)
    • April 2021 (4)
    • March 2021 (3)
    • February 2021 (6)
    • January 2021 (8)
    • December 2020 (4)
    • November 2020 (5)
    • October 2020 (7)
    • September 2020 (7)
    • August 2020 (10)
    • July 2020 (6)
    • June 2020 (9)
    • May 2020 (9)
    • April 2020 (5)
    • March 2020 (7)
    • February 2020 (3)
    • January 2020 (4)
    • December 2019 (4)
    • November 2019 (6)
    • October 2019 (3)
    • September 2019 (6)
    • August 2019 (3)
    • July 2019 (1)
    • June 2019 (3)
    • May 2019 (2)
    • April 2019 (2)
    • March 2019 (2)
    • February 2019 (4)
    • January 2019 (2)
    • December 2018 (2)
    • November 2018 (2)
    • October 2018 (2)
    • September 2018 (1)
    • August 2018 (2)
    • July 2018 (3)
    • June 2018 (1)
    • May 2018 (3)
    • April 2018 (1)
    • March 2018 (3)
    • February 2018 (3)
    • January 2018 (1)
    • December 2017 (3)
    • November 2017 (3)
    • October 2017 (3)
    • September 2017 (2)
    • August 2017 (2)
    • July 2017 (2)
    • June 2017 (2)
    • May 2017 (4)
    • April 2017 (3)
    • March 2017 (3)
    • February 2017 (5)
    • January 2017 (3)
    • December 2016 (2)
    • November 2016 (5)
    • October 2016 (4)
    • September 2016 (3)
    • August 2016 (5)
    • July 2016 (3)
    • June 2016 (4)
    • May 2016 (3)
    • April 2016 (6)
    • March 2016 (4)
    • February 2016 (3)
    • January 2016 (5)
    • December 2015 (6)
    • November 2015 (5)
    • October 2015 (8)
    • September 2015 (2)
    • August 2015 (5)
    • July 2015 (7)
    • June 2015 (4)
    • May 2015 (6)
    • April 2015 (5)
    • March 2015 (7)
    • February 2015 (15)
    • January 2015 (8)
    • December 2014 (5)
    • November 2014 (8)
    • October 2014 (7)
    • September 2014 (9)
    • August 2014 (5)
    • July 2014 (11)
    • June 2014 (5)
    • May 2014 (4)
    • April 2014 (5)
    • March 2014 (8)
    • February 2014 (8)
    • January 2014 (5)
    • December 2013 (7)
    • November 2013 (7)
    • October 2013 (14)
    • September 2013 (12)
    • August 2013 (15)
    • July 2013 (15)
    • June 2013 (15)
    • May 2013 (15)
    • April 2013 (15)
    • March 2013 (15)
    • February 2013 (15)
    • January 2013 (15)
    • December 2012 (15)
    • November 2012 (15)
    • October 2012 (15)
    • September 2012 (15)
    • August 2012 (15)
    • July 2012 (15)
    • June 2012 (15)
    • May 2012 (15)
    • April 2012 (15)
    • March 2012 (15)
    • February 2012 (15)
    • January 2012 (15)
    • December 2011 (15)
    • November 2011 (17)
    • October 2011 (17)
    • September 2011 (17)
    • August 2011 (21)
    • July 2011 (20)
    • June 2011 (17)
    • May 2011 (15)
    • April 2011 (17)
    • March 2011 (25)
    • February 2011 (20)
    • January 2011 (20)
    • December 2010 (18)
    • November 2010 (21)
    • October 2010 (21)
    • September 2010 (25)
    • August 2010 (20)
    • July 2010 (10)
    • June 2010 (11)
    • May 2010 (19)
    • April 2010 (16)
    • March 2010 (14)
    • February 2010 (22)
    • January 2010 (18)
    • December 2009 (20)
    • November 2009 (20)
    • October 2009 (3)
    • September 2009 (21)
    • August 2009 (19)
    • July 2009 (12)
    • June 2009 (12)
    • May 2009 (11)
    • April 2009 (15)
    • March 2009 (21)
    • February 2009 (4)
    • January 2009 (12)
    • December 2008 (13)
    • November 2008 (9)
    • October 2008 (22)
    • September 2008 (20)
    • August 2008 (16)
    • July 2008 (14)
    • June 2008 (7)
  • Blog Stats

    • 5,757,378 hits
  • Please give your feed back .

  • Click below to see who is watching this website live !

  • This site will never aim for profit. Still ,this donation link is added at the request of few visitors who wanted to contribute and of-course that will help make it sustainable . Donate Button with Credit Cards
  • Please Note

    The author acknowledges all the queries posted by the readers and wishes to answer them .Due to logistic reasons only few could be responded. Inconvenience caused is regretted.

WPThemes.


  • Follow Following
    • Dr.S.Venkatesan MD
    • Join 819 other followers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • Dr.S.Venkatesan MD
    • Customize
    • Follow Following
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Copy shortlink
    • Report this content
    • View post in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
 

Loading Comments...
 

    %d bloggers like this: