I was recently asked to suggest a topic for debate on STEMI in a major Indian cardiology conference. I wished , this is what we should be mulling over, with a set of virtual guest lectures and special invitees from heaven ! Plenary session : State of the Art STEMI care Time : 11.AM , Speaker : Dr Hippocrates Topic : Aren’t we erring on either side of the Noble profession ? Moderator: Dr. William Osler Chairperson : Dr .Harvey Cushings, Dr,Sir Thomas Lewis ,Dr Paul Wood , Excerpts : “While , vast number of our country-men’s culprit artery doesn’t even get that mandatory Aspirin on time . . . an urban rich man’s distal non-culprit artery is decorated with a fancy bio-vascular scaffold making that innocuous lesion vulnerable in the process as well ! Aren’t we erring on either side in the Noble profession ?
Archive for February, 2015
Posted in Atrial fibrillation, Infrequently asked questions in cardiology (iFAQs), tagged atrial fibrillation, atrial fibrillation in stemi, management of atrial fibrillation during stemi on February 25, 2015 | Leave a Comment »
Atrial fibrillation is the most common arrhythmia we encounter in clinical cardiology .Ironically it is uncommon during ACS and extremely rare in association with UA/NSTEMI. Surprisingly , an entity ” Ischemic AF” is not to be found in cardiology literature.
The incidence of AF in STEMI is less than 5%. Occurs more often due to factors other than primary ischemia of atrial musculature. Of-course , AF in association with Infero posterio MI and RVMI is an important trigger for AF.LCX disease is more often associated with AF as it gives up a consistent branch to left atrium.
Though it is tempting to implicate ischemia as a trigger for AF ,most often it occurs , in elderly ,associated COPD ,hypoxia preexisting atrial disease .Acute elevation of LVEDP and stretch of left atrium could be a more logical mechanism.
- AF can bring down the blood pressure.
- Worsen ischemia by increasing the MVO2
- Could be very destabilising in RV infarction
- Surprisingly it is well tolerated in many STEMI patients.
AF in STEMI- Is it an emergency ?
It would appear so. But , if hemodyanmicaly stable one need not panic.Many times they are transient .Correcting hypoxia, optimizing beta blocker would help.
Role of DC Shock , Precautions before shocking & Post shock events
- DC shock is done only if there is hemodynamic instability or ongoing ischemia .(Very difficult to rule out the later )
- Mural LV clots can form even within 24 hours and DC shock embolic strokes may ensue .
- Hence it is mandatory to do an echocardiogram prior to shocking.
Drug of choice
- Class 1c -Flecanide.
- Class 3 -Amiodarone./Ibutilide/
Role of Digoxin
There used to be a concern about usage of Digoxin in the setting of ACS as it pro-arrhythmic , but it remains useful in the management of AF .There is no other anti-arrhymic drug available to control, the heart rate without depression of the LV function
Rate control vs rhythm control
Always aim for rhythm control in the setting of ACS.Rate control is may not be a logical concept in acute settings though Amiodarone does both.
Wide QRS Atrial fibrillation
As we know , AF in STEMI can conduct with aberrancy , and we have a traditional teaching all wide qrs tachycardia are VT in the setting of MI making our patients statistically vulnerable.
After all , both entities lack discernible p waves. At high rates it may be difficult to identify irregularity RR interval. However , one would shock such patients and both AF and VT would respond .All is well that ends well.
AF during STEMI is a risky arrhythmia and needs urgent intervention , but one need not be alarmed .There is a set of protocol . Only hemodynamically unstable AF require DC shock .Many times it is just transient.There has been instances of physician panicky that has resulted in more adverse events .
Posted in cath lab tips and tricks, ivus, Newer technology, tagged cmoc ivus catheter, cto intervention, forward looking ivus catheter, ivus, tips and tricks i ivus on February 22, 2015 | 2 Comments »
Cardiologists do magic inside the human coronary artery , that too in a live beating heart , unlike the surgeons.Blocks are removed , holes are closed, valves are inserted , scars are burnt, new electrical connections are laid .They do this with relative blind vision with good degree of success. Still, as we aim for more precise interventions we require excellent imaging modalities to assist us.
In PCI of CTO(Chronic total occlusion) the critical element to know is the morphology of the tissue plane , what exactly we burrow ? as we navigate through complex, often hard shapeless tortuous tissue tunnels . Our patients will be surprised to know we are currently doing this with our eyes shut. If only we have a camera guide in the tip of the wire it give us tremendous advantage .
The exiting IVUS technology can only look sideways . Now a new vision is added by annular array of transducer at tip with CMOS sensor .The technology is just coming out it would be use for us in the near future .
Anatomy of the forward looking ultrasonic eye
Posted in Cardiology -guidelines, Infrequently asked questions in cardiology (iFAQs), tagged evidence based medicine, guidelines vs recommendatios, instituional protocols, medical ethics, protocols on February 21, 2015 | Leave a Comment »
In this era of synthesized evidence base, one of my intellectually aberrant student asked How can we indulge in a popular coronary procedure with class 1 indication backed by level C evidence ? (As defined by the seemingly invincible guideline committee of various International cardiology organizations .)
I told him ,
- Institutional protocols are to be followed
- Guidelines are to be respected
- Recommendations are to be considered
- Please be reminded all of the above can be rejected outright !
Finally , realise Individual decisions based on sound scientific understanding with zero non academic intrusions will be revered forever !
*Caution : If you think you haven’t yet reached that the level of individuality , come what may , you are expected follow these advisories which are primarily aimed at providing quality care and you will be pardoned of any adversaries as well !
Posted in Auscultation, Cardiology -unresolved questions, tagged absent s 2 in pulse deficit, effect of vvpd on aortic and mitral valve closure, heart rate in bigeminy, mechanism of pulse deficit, more s1 and less s2, paired pacing and vpds, pulse deficitin bigeminy, pulse rate in bigeminy, ventricular bi-geminy, ventricular ectopic beats on February 17, 2015 | Leave a Comment »
Answer : Most probably B .
What we feel in peripheral pulse , is one weak and the one strong beat in sequence .The later is due to post VPD potentiation. Since there is a compensatory pause , ECG rate (Number of QRS complexes /mt) and pulse rate are same .
Ironically , heart rate and ECG rate are not same as VPDs impact mitral valve more than aortic valve and cause additional S 1 than S 2 making heart rate considerably more than pulse rate and logically it must be double the pulse rate . This may be difficult to appreciate by auscultation, but can be documented by phono-cardiogram or by M mode echocardiogram.
Posted in Aortic diseases, coarctation of aorta, Infrequently asked questions in cardiology (iFAQs), tagged coarctation of aorta, collaterals in coarctation, cp stent in coarctation, effect of bicuspid valve on coarctation gradient, effect of ht on gradient in coarctation, gradient across coarctation of aorta, mechansim of hypertension in coarctation, renal hypertension in coarctation on February 16, 2015 | Leave a Comment »
The gradient across coarctation is not simply (& solely ) determined by degree of obstruction , as one would believe.Understanding the hemodynamics and various factors that can influence the gradient is essential .Relieveing the obstruction /gradient by stent or surgery may not be synonymous with successful treatment as we understand now the entire aorta right from the root to abdomen can influence the gradient ,along with systemic factors.We also know , some of these patients harbor histological abnormalities in the entire stretch of Aorta what is being referred to as pan aortopathy , that may influence the long-term outcome.
Posted in bio ethics, Cardiology -Therapeutic dilemma, cardiology-ethics, tagged adult vs pediatric echo report, echocardiography expertise required, errors in echo report, errors in echocardiography, ethical issues in cardiology, inadequate echocardiogram, incomplete echocardiogram, mistakes in echo report, pediatric echocardiography who should do ? on February 14, 2015 | Leave a Comment »
A cardiologist is a physician who has trained himself in a special way to deal with any problem of heart.Ironically , it exists only on paper.The field has developed so vast no one can master everything .There is no such “Pan or global cardiology expert” .In fact it would be shortly become unethical to try to become one !
Pediatric cardiology has developed into such a big field , doing a echo in newborn or infant has become a comprehensive job and requires special talent .This unique and excellent study from Narayana Institute , Bangalore published in the prestigious Annals of pediatric cardiology throws up interesting realities about the quality of echo report done by adult cardiologists in children .The error rate appears huge and stands at prohibitive 38%. While many errors were minor , major were also not insignificant (23%)
With bulk of the pediatric echo involves in the critical decision making process of device closures and interventions the data required becomes vital .The commonest cause for error is probably not due lack of knowledge and but to due to lack of commitment and continuous exposure in doing echocardiograms in those age group.
While this paper decently skirts the issue of quality of pediatric echo done in medium sized hospitals without pediatric cardiology service ,I can say the error rates or inadequate reportage could be significant in such hospitals with apparently good ranking .
Of course ,we have many adult cardiologist who do excellent pediatric work , It looks like , as a general rule performing pediatric echocardiograms by non -institutionalized adult cardiologist may not be appropriate ! It may be wise for them to avoid doing echocardiogram in small infants with truly complex disorders (even perceived complex) till they gain the required expertise and confidence.
I recall an adverse issue happened years ago , when I had missed an associated PAPVC in ASD that made my surgeon anxious on table .In a country like ours there is no one to audit our work , “our conscience remains the only option” to deliver the best for our patients especially so, when they are tiny lives in distress.
Who am I to suggest who should do echocardiogram ? , after all every cardiologist is licensed to do that . One simple suggestion would be , if not confident they can at least mention in their report it is only preliminary evaluation and need to be followed up with an expert . I do that whenever its required and gives me peace of mind as well !
More controversies* to come
Can adult cardiologist do pediatric intervention ?
* Controversy : One of the meaning for this word is “It is a thought process set into motion , that aids digging up hidden truths ”