Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for the ‘bio ethics’ Category

Poverty is a cruelest disease of mankind , the infective vector is not any deadly HINI or retro virus , but mostly the fellow humans themselves ! This is why WHO has included poverty in the ICD code (Z59.5 ) as a disease .

I used to wonder , as a member of Noble profession , should we fight against this disease or be happy to spend my entire life time cleaning the coronary arteries of affluent human-beings and earn few bucks !

Can growth of money eliminate poverty ? 

We may think so  . . .  but it doesn’t most times .Of course ,  affluence bring more jobs to the poor , logically it should alleviate poverty. But , we  know the reality. Its not that easy concept to understand . However we have robust evidence for the opposite ie affluence can aggregate poverty .

If poverty is a disease &  if  mindless  affluence is an Indirect cause for it  , then affluence also becomes a potential disease , Is in’t ? Will WHO include it in ICD listing ?

May I propose Z59.5A to be called  Uncontrolled &  manic desire for affluence ?  Since it is  made at the cost of  fellow humans , it should be clubbed along with poverty as a worrisome disease. Once its included in the ICD manual , I guess it will be unethical to ignore this disease. 

We all aim for growth in life .Nothing wrong in that .There are many facets of life that requires growth. Unfortunately , for most  homo-sapiens ,  growth is synonymous with multiplication of money . . . nothing else seems to matter ! Money when it grows unregulated ,  begins to control you and hijack your  body and mind .

One more issue to  comprehend is , rapid growth of money is possible only at the cost of something (or someone) else – Akin to cancer cachexia ,it depletes the body (Earth ) of it’s resources ( Nature abuse ,  extreme poverty , inequality ,  Third world exploitation , wars, etc ) For the  medical professionals  it is all the more important that growth shouldn’t mean money , as it has a direct and conflicting  impact on some one else’s life  !

mitosis of money 003

Just Imagine ,  if the all the car companies combine together , aim for a  dramatic growth from the current  4 %  to 25 % by 2030  and manage to  achieve it by any means ! . . . This planet will sink in the combined weight of automobile Junk !

It is obvious , uncontrolled growth in any form requires vigorous regulation and  Intervention and will eventually require a radical surgery if the growth goes unabated  !  

Counter point

It is foolish to link growing money and wealth  equivalent to cancer. Unlike cancer cells , money multiplied can be put into use for those in need .It is the principle of charity .But the reality is , human beings who are rabidly after money rarely have this mind set.In contrary the haven’ts have it in plenty. In my opinion, excess money has a dubious  capacity  to  contaminate  human values  ! (Why should some rich and elite opposes affordable health care  to poor ?)

Let us amass wealth and help others . Microsoft  is able to do it. Apple may do it later. What is the need for big companies social responsibility and philanthropy ? If the business worlds  motive and end product  promotes equality and goodness , sans exploitation , the question of charity at a later date never  arises.

Final message

If extreme poverty is a disease ,  forces that Initiates or sustains  poverty cycle can not be a bliss. In this context , the  manic affluence (& the urge for it)  should be included as a communicable disease since it seems to be most contagious as well.

In health care delivery “affluent and modern care” may also connote a sinister meaning. Poor people might think they are deprived of good care because they cant afford it. But ,truth hides deep. True sustainable caring is little to do with affordability+ , since most of the modern health care expenditure is jacked up with junk.

I know in my country people sell their life time assets for what they think as  crucial health care .(Of course universal health care insurance is just beginning to come in. Here again insurance based health care has inflated the actual costs and threatening to impose inappropriate therapies .

As a medical professional we should aim for the cheapest  and best form* of treatment to our patients . Artificially inflating the cost of therapy by worthless drugs, devices, procedures and disseminating them invariably leads to pathological  growth of science.

*If any one thinks “cheap and quality” doesn’t go together in medical care it is ignorance ! Most problems has simple and effective solution.

Post-amble 

 I object this statement -Modern health is nothing to do with affordability.

We need to go to the basics then .What is true health ? Forget about transplants, Organ Assists, Five star critical care .They seem to work in a minority , but drain the world economy. Its Impact on global health is at best minuscule. One Important analysis say 90% health care cost is wasted in prolonging the last 30 days of life of homo-sapiens.(Will get the reference for it )

Please note 

Diseases that occur to  affluent population  is entirely different topic . Can be found elsewhereDisease of affluence

 

Read Full Post »

Bedside wisdom

We have been  using unfractioned Heparin for long , and its  is better than any other anticoagulants  in ACS . . . 

Our observation shows that Streptokinase has distinct advanatge over Tenektepelase as it works longer duration  . . .

My experience  says Diuretic and beta blockers  are still good as first line therapy for Hypertension  . . .

Mind you , there are infinite  number of such wisdom in every sub specialty of medical field.

However , the typical response from any  modern scientific intellect would be . . .

Stop it . . . Its old  stuff folk  , What does the current data say ?

medical-data-ethics-futility

Common uttering  in scientific forums,

Is there data backing up your  treatment modality ?

Is there sufficient data ?

Come’on , grow up , don’t talk about experience in a scientific forum . . . come out with data man !

No one seem to care the quality of the data . Every one bothers  about the quality of the Author and Journal instead  .  if its X Y Z its ok If its A B C no its not acceptable data.

Probably , Data is most misused word in medical science.

In scientific world,  “unpublished sense” goes straightway to  dustbin ,while we have so many avenues for the  published nonsense to  be celebrated (Still, bulk of guidelines in cardiology is backed up by Level C evidence which means experience  of experts !)

By the way what do we mean by data ?

Its organised collection of genuine scientific information , that’s post processed ,  follow it up with sound inference and faithful questioning and debate that should ultimately end up as  “clinical  application” in patient domain for consumption.(No prizes for guessing , whats happening in real world !)

OMG, give us back that elusive Common sense . . . which  I  think we  lost some time  at the turn of this millennium  !

Wrong or useless data : Who will recall ?

Once applied to patient , these data is  to be scrutinized and monitored . If we find a study conclusion  and reality does not match , we  need to stall the data from adversely  exploding .Every stake holder should have the power to do it. There have been instances a treatment modality got banished in one country is legally permitted in other country knowing fully well the futility.

Final message 

Modern scientific Data* is not God sent. Its  created , synthesised and disseminated in various mind factories. All you require is , backing up with some pioneering journal publication with huge impact factor.It’s not really blasphemy to question things which doesn’t make sense .Unfortunately , wrong data can be tackled only with further data .(There is no other means I guess !)

When does “good common sense”  become hard data and evidence ?

Its the act of publication , so  please guys whenever you  find some contamination  in so-called scientific data  please post here.  To begin with I am registering a new Journal  “Commonsense journal in cardiology”

*Please note, data is not a bad word as this write-up  seem to suggest.Naturally occurring , epidemiological and  observational data about diseases are the foundations for medical science .The issue become murky when few motivated humans play brutal  games at the sensitive  interface between science and truth.

It should be acknowledged , there is a distinct risk  of  this fight against falsehood end up in blocking  true progress  of science . Still , Homo sapiens  are (believed to be !)  intelligent enough to differentiate good from bad , that’s the reason God gave us the sixth sense !

Link to Lown Institute (Started by Cardiologist and Nobel peace prize  Laurate Dr Lown who strives hard to pursue this goal)

Further reading :  Scientific Reversals in cardiology 

Read Full Post »

medical ethics stastistics www.drsvenkatesan.com

Read Full Post »

We all know to err is human , but most of us probably won’t agree medical mistakes , (bulk of which happen in the name of practicing state of the art of science ! ) could be the dominant theme in modern medical care !

BMJ exposes this  well known secret with the help of most authentic data from an apex scientific body CDC , Atlanta .

Reference

http://www.bmj.com/content/353/bmj.i2139#

Read Full Post »

Men are from Mars , and  Women are from Venus  ” . . . Do you agree ?

Many probably witness the much talked  differential behavior among the gender  every day. Its argued , men take more risk in life ( often  senseless !) , some go to the extreme to  suggest  Men are Idiots and decorate them with a  provocative title  MIT (Men Idiot Theory ) (Mcpherson 2011).Risk taking is important in life, but at  what cost ? Does women (Who  are caring by nature )  help themselves  and the society by less risk taking behavior ?

I stumbled upon this rare piece of writing from BMJ which  would demand  in depth analysis  into this gender phenomenon based on  evolutionary biology and genetics.

This article concludes, Yes, men  . . . indeed  tend to take some foolish risks in various life situations that result in potential harm.

Gender difference in medical outcome men are from mars women venus male idiotic theory darwin theory

What is the influence of MIT on medical profession and patient outcome ?

Now , Iam compelled to ask  a hypothetical question .Does women medical professionals take  less aggressive stance and low risk taking behavior  and in the process result in less mortality and morbidity to our patients  ?

I would think the answer to that question  would be in affirmative .I wish  BMJ or anyone  should design a study on this issue.

Reference

1.Harris CR, Jenkins M, Glaser D. Gender differences in risk assessment: why do women take fewer risks than men? Judgm Decis Mak2006;1(1): p. 48-63.

2.Eckel CC, Grossman PJ. Men, women and risk aversion: experimental evidence. In: Plott CR, Smith VL, eds. Handbook of experimental economics results. Vol 1. North-Holland, 2008:1061-73.

3.McPherson J. Women are from Venus, men are idiots. Andrews McMeel, 2011

4.Northcutt W. The Darwin Awards: The official Darwin Awards: 180 bizarre true stories of how dumb humans have met their maker. Orion, 2004.

 

 

Read Full Post »

These two quotes  on practice of medicine are close to my heart , one from Voltaire , a non medical man (a French poet )  and  the other from ,one of the greatest medical professional of our times, William  Osler .

gretest medical quotes william osler voltaire

It is amazing ,how the thinking pattern of a  philosopher  and a true scientific professional living  centuries apart are almost in sync with a great medical reality !

Read Full Post »

I was recently asked to suggest a topic for debate on STEMI in  a major Indian cardiology conference. I wished , this is what we  should be mulling  over, with a set of  virtual  guest lectures and special invitees from heaven ! Plenary  session : State of the Art  STEMI care             Time :  11.AMSpeaker : Dr Hippocrates Topic : Aren’t  we erring   on either side of the  Noble profession ? Moderator:  Dr. William Osler Chairperson :  Dr .Harvey Cushings, Dr,Sir Thomas Lewis ,Dr Paul Wood , Excerpts : “While , vast number of  our country-men’s  culprit artery doesn’t even get that  mandatory  Aspirin on time . . . an urban rich  man’s  distal non-culprit artery  is decorated with a fancy  bio-vascular scaffold making  that innocuous lesion vulnerable in the process as well !  Aren’t  we erring   on either side  in the  Noble profession ?

Read Full Post »

Older Posts »