Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for May, 2014

Can we close an  ASD in a  25 year old women  severe  pulmonary hypertension ?
Volumes of literature has been written  on the subject.Dedicated cath studies  have been done with multiple parameters .
Still , there is a lingering doubt !
Here is  a  3 minute  practical solution  based on 5 easily available parameters. (* Also referred to as  unscientific  in medical parlance !)
1.  O2 saturation
2. Pulmonary artery diastolic and pulse pressure
3. RV function,
4 .Systemic pressure
5. Functional class
  • If O2 saturation is > 90 % consistently  there is likely to be significant  left to right shunt  .Closure is to strongly considered
  • If 02  saturation is near 95 % there is absolutely no contraindication at any level of PVR.
  • Systolic pulmonary artery pressure derived by TR jet is least useful index.Pulmonary artery diastolic pressure reflects true vascular  reactivity of the pulmonary  circulation.A wide swinging pulmonary arterial pulse indicates dynamism in circulation and hence operablity.
  • If pulmonary artery  pulse pressure is  wide (>50)  , or PA diastolic BP is < 30 one can safely presume irreversible damage to pulmonary vasculature has not occurred and these patients would  benefit  from surgical closure .
  • RV  function should be assessed carefully in every patient.This is as important as PVR .Significant RV dysfunction is an absolute contraindication.
  • Never close the shunt in patients who is in class 4  symptoms.
  • Never close a shunt if the systemic blood pressure is low( 90mmhg)
  • Some believe  PDA may be closed at any given PVR , while  worst outcomes occur with ASD as supra-systemic pulmonary pressure is possible.
Always monitor these patients meticulously especially  in the initial days following surgery  for deterioration .Most patients will do well if they cross the first 30 days. The RV  learns to adopts with  new  pulmonary hemodynamics !

 

Read Full Post »

Many  readers  of this site might have wondered  , about a  series of biased articles  pulling down the  superiority of pPCI in STEMI.

This  French  study (FAST-MI) throws stunning data  from the real world. Initial Fibrinolysis* defeated pPCI in all aspects of coronary reperfusion !

FAST MI primary PCI  trialFAST MI primary PCI  trial 2

*When we say fibrinolysis arm it means Pharmaco -Invasive approach .Today our  brain  is irreversibly conditioned to believe standalone fibrinolysis is  forbidden in STEMI . (Which I strongly disagree!) I am sure, very soon another stunning study will unmask the truth about standalone fibrinolysis  as well !

Final message

  • The truth  is ,  pPCI is really a superior  modality in some of the complicated  subsets of STEMI that too if performed fast.
  • In all other situations Initial fibrinolysis will rule supreme !
  • pPCI is not an Innovation for mass consumption!
  • Hence, “the roof top call” for  pPCI for every STEMI is nether desirable nor feasible.

Now, we have this evidence from France (Which was well known to us a decade ago) As always , truth takes time to arrive , while falsehood can come instantly !

 

In 2014 , after two decades of celebration of pPCI  the flagship Circulation journal  throws this Editorial !

primary pci vs thromolysis debate fast study

 

 

 

Read Full Post »

nobel prize in medicine 2

Why not Nobel prize for clinical  science ?

 

nobel prize for medicine

Nobel prize was constituted  to reward people or organisation  who make a  huge impact on the welfare of man kind. It is given in various categories  for  outstanding contributions in Physics, Chemistry, Literature, Peace, Physiology or Medicine, and Economic Sciences

Unfortunately,  there is a strong bias towards  raw basic science when it is given in the filed of medicine.Do you know  ,there is no Nobel prize exclusive  for medical science ? It shares with human physiology the only field included for Nobel prize in medicine.

Evolution of human  history reveals it is not the stunning  scientific discoveries that impact the mankind . It is  largely dependent  on how we  use them . It is true and natural ,invention of  sub atomic particles , decoding  quantum mechanics  and  trans-cellular  signals always generate great interest  than others.

In medical science, time and again we have seen problems arise in  applying fruits of scientific  research into  practical  usage in the patient domain  in the bedside.

What is use of rewarding inventor of  nitric oxide with a  Nobel prize , when billion-dollar nitrate  industry is thriving on a non existing  life long indication of  stable angina .

It is  surprising  to note ,  Nobel  committee does  give credit to wisdom &  intellect  while awarding  prize in  peace,  literary  or  economic sciences. For some reason it lacks  such a vision when it comes to medical sciences !

We have seen Nobel prize being  awarded to organization that strive for peace and welfare of society and community like UN ,EU  etc.The world health organization is the premier power supposed to provide and  regulate the health in this planet.I do not recall any time WHO  was close to  considered for the  Noble prize in medicine  !

Nobel Ironies

Nobel committee rewards  economists who point out lacunae in vital world macro and micro economics  theories.

Dubious men(Heads of state )  are decorated with Noble peace prizes  for preventing a war in  one geographical area while doing exactly the  opposite elsewhere !

In this modern  millennium  where scientific pursuits are contaminated and  many of the  research questions are misdirected or irrelevant , Nobel committee needs a through rejig in the manner in which  medical  Nobel prize is  being awarded. We know ,Noble’s death wish was to award the brightest mind with highest scientific  breakthroughs in those world . . . but

I guess Alfred Nobel if alive would have changed his rules .He wouldn’t  have imagined modern science would systematically devalue common sense and reinventing it would also deserve an award equivalent to Nobel !

Some of the medical  discoveries that deserve noble medical prize

  • States which excel in   school health nutrition and  other basic health programs  for the downtrodden
  • Doctors who promote bed side clinical skills
  • Tobacco eradication networks
  • Organisations like medicine san-frontiers which strives for basic life saving medication for all
  • Journal houses that specialise  on Medical ethics and clinical sciences
  • Medical professionals and institutions provide value education
  • Medical economists who expose the wasted financial resources that  widen the gap between sick and rich

How about    Nobel prize in cardiology  for preventive cardiologist  who successfully terminates a million statin prescription and restoring natural exercise directed lipid regulation in them  ?

How about  Noble prize for a noble  physician sitting in corporate hospital infested with all commercial ingredients who could resist and argue successfully  against   inappropriate tonsillectomies  and appendectomies ?

I am sure , such a man will be a  laughing stock  for most of us !

An appeal to Nobel committee

It is a wish , Noble prize  in medicine is to be included for people who do yeomen services in preventive and  clinical care and professional who carry forward the legacy of  caring for the sick with  clinical application of available scientific wisdom !

In this scientifically obsessed world , It will be a new beginning in the  way future medical research will be directed and nurtured ! Only then the true power of Noble prize in medicine will be  realised !

Reference

Link to Wikipedia Nobel prize in Medicine

 

Read Full Post »