
Posts Tagged ‘modern medicine’
Forbidden quotes in medicine : Healing shall prevail over harming
Posted in Uncategorized, tagged bmj, british journal of medical ethics, dr s venkatesan, ethics in medicine, famous quotes on medical ethics, Hippocratic oath, indian journal of medical ethics, lancet, madras medical college, medical education, modern medicine, nejm, venkatesan sangareddi, world health organisation on April 9, 2026|
Why Nobel prize in medicine is not given for clinical science ?
Posted in bio ethics, Cardiology - Clinical, Clinical cardiology, medical quotes, Two line sermons in cardiology, tagged alfred noble noble profession, medical ethics, modern medicine, nobel prize for medicine, principles of practice of medicine, science humanity medicine on May 23, 2014| Leave a Comment »
Why not Nobel prize for clinical science ?
Nobel prize was constituted to reward people or organisation who make a huge impact on the welfare of man kind. It is given in various categories for outstanding contributions in Physics, Chemistry, Literature, Peace, Physiology or Medicine, and Economic Sciences
Unfortunately, there is a strong bias towards raw basic science when it is given in the filed of medicine.Do you know ,there is no Nobel prize exclusive for medical science ? It shares with human physiology the only field included for Nobel prize in medicine.
Evolution of human history reveals it is not the stunning scientific discoveries that impact the mankind . It is largely dependent on how we use them . It is true and natural ,invention of sub atomic particles , decoding quantum mechanics and trans-cellular signals always generate great interest than others.
In medical science, time and again we have seen problems arise in applying fruits of scientific research into practical usage in the patient domain in the bedside.
What is use of rewarding inventor of nitric oxide with a Nobel prize , when billion-dollar nitrate industry is thriving on a non existing life long indication of stable angina .
It is surprising to note , Nobel committee does give credit to wisdom & intellect while awarding prize in peace, literary or economic sciences. For some reason it lacks such a vision when it comes to medical sciences !
We have seen Nobel prize being awarded to organization that strive for peace and welfare of society and community like UN ,EU etc.The world health organization is the premier power supposed to provide and regulate the health in this planet.I do not recall any time WHO was close to considered for the Noble prize in medicine !
Nobel Ironies
Nobel committee rewards economists who point out lacunae in vital world macro and micro economics theories.
Dubious men(Heads of state ) are decorated with Noble peace prizes for preventing a war in one geographical area while doing exactly the opposite elsewhere !
In this modern millennium where scientific pursuits are contaminated and many of the research questions are misdirected or irrelevant , Nobel committee needs a through rejig in the manner in which medical Nobel prize is being awarded. We know ,Noble’s death wish was to award the brightest mind with highest scientific breakthroughs in those world . . . but
I guess Alfred Nobel if alive would have changed his rules .He wouldn’t have imagined modern science would systematically devalue common sense and reinventing it would also deserve an award equivalent to Nobel !
Some of the medical discoveries that deserve noble medical prize
- States which excel in school health nutrition and other basic health programs for the downtrodden
- Doctors who promote bed side clinical skills
- Tobacco eradication networks
- Organisations like medicine san-frontiers which strives for basic life saving medication for all
- Journal houses that specialise on Medical ethics and clinical sciences
- Medical professionals and institutions provide value education
- Medical economists who expose the wasted financial resources that widen the gap between sick and rich
How about Nobel prize in cardiology for preventive cardiologist who successfully terminates a million statin prescription and restoring natural exercise directed lipid regulation in them ?
How about Noble prize for a noble physician sitting in corporate hospital infested with all commercial ingredients who could resist and argue successfully against inappropriate tonsillectomies and appendectomies ?
I am sure , such a man will be a laughing stock for most of us !
An appeal to Nobel committee
It is a wish , Noble prize in medicine is to be included for people who do yeomen services in preventive and clinical care and professional who carry forward the legacy of caring for the sick with clinical application of available scientific wisdom !
In this scientifically obsessed world , It will be a new beginning in the way future medical research will be directed and nurtured ! Only then the true power of Noble prize in medicine will be realised !
Reference
Link to Wikipedia Nobel prize in Medicine
Evidence based chaos in critical care units !
Posted in Cardiology -guidelines, cardiology -Therapeutics, cardiology-ethics, tagged appache score, critical care medicine, critical care outcome, ebm, evidence based chaos, evidence based verses experience based, hippocrates, modern medicine on February 8, 2013| 1 Comment »
Critical and intensive medical care is meant for supporting an individual organ (or multiple organs ) at times of extreme distress , till the healing process prevails over .Later , the patient shall be shifted safely out of the unit .
Whatever be the modern technology , the single most important factor that determines the success of ICU outcome lies within the patient body ( One estimate says patient factor constitutes almost 85-90% -Dukes medical center )
Ironically , the modern gadgets, drugs , devices threatens . . . rather fights . . . with this inherent patient fighting mechanism . We will never-ever know how many cellular switches are turned on by our biological high command , that compensates and tries to restore body homeostasis.
Here is a personal experience with a patient management scenario in an ICU . The patient is none other than my father !
He is a 82 year old man who has developed a acute febrile illness which rapidly degenerated into acute respiratory failure and X ray showing infective bilateral pneumonia and probable ARDS .He was on ventilator for 4 days and subsequently weaned off but still heavily dependent on oxygen . His lung is wet with crackles and wheeze intermittently . His cardiac function was excellent . In one of the episodes of hypoxia he developed , mild shooting of blood pressure and minimal ST changes . Alarmed by this he was started on beta blocker , for the first time . It was titrated up to maximum doses for a suspected ischemic episode .
It is well-known , ECG changes are extremely common in hypoxia , tachycardiac stressed individuals .
Sympathetic blockade is important , only if , it is an inappropriate surge . When the body fights a disease it is the only major biological weapon available to him .How is it justified to block it ?
When this was discussed with the team they said they have no power to deviate from protocol and there is one article , that says BBs are beneficial even in COPD !
The patient continues to be in ICU dependent on oxygen with extreme ICU fatigue definitely worsened by the heavy dose of adrenergic blockers which is in my opinion delaying recovery !
Different organ specialist are prescribing drugs according to their level of understanding (evidence is always available for them . . . some where ) and radiology fellows keep taking snaps of distressed organs in various angles in HD quality images . Meanwhile , CT scan seems to have revealed a chronic interstitial process . . . how to diagnose a chronic lung condition in a man who is yet to recover from major acute inflammatory lung Injury ! I do not know ? And the current development is they are considering disseminated tuberculosis !
You may a big physician , the patient may be a very close family member , modern health care system makes you watch helplessly once you hand over patient to a complex care unit .
We hope for the best .
Final message
Medical practice . . . however intensive the care may be . . . the bottom line is . . . it should be based on common sense . Modern medicine tends to make this faculty of our brain blunted .
The specialty of Intensivist is largely misunderstood . It goes more with satisfying scientific egos and public perceptions rather than true patient needs .
We need not react to every changing parameter that emanates from the modern machines that keep sending out live data from a seriously ill patient , on a moment to moment basis ! (We simply do not need that ! If only a pilot reacts with jitters to every air pocket turbulence , he will not reach the destination safely ! )
From a cardiologist perspective , the humble request to all Intensivists and critical care physicians is , avoid being in “fire fighting mode” for all those subtle ECG changes that occur in ICUs , especially with multi- system disorder (Caution : Acute coronary syndrome in CCU / post PCI set up is different story altogether where even a minor ST shift can be significant ! )
Heaven’s sake let us rely more in our brain rather than the machines and devices !
Above story is not even a tip of an Iceberg . I come across it every day in many ICUs I visit . The most saddening aspect is , we can not point out these mistakes to our fellow professionals , as it amounts to hurting academic egos .They are more important than patient care at any given point of time !
Counter point
For any system to work , it needs a strict set of guidelines , other wise the system of care will fail. This is a fundamental basis on which modem medical care works . The only issue is , we should keep checking for any inadequacies in the evidence base and try to correct it. So do not blame the EBM . It has come to stay .That is the future ! You are very pessimistic towards modern science !
Rapid response to counter point
But the real issue is . . . by the time next evidence base finds a major flaw in the existing system of care , damages are already done . So with your clinical acumen every learned physician is free to create his own real world experience .(That is also called Level 3 evidence now ) ** Protocols are not sacred sermons . It may be (rather must be !) violated if there is a need for the benefit of patient .
Disclaimer
* This is not an attempt to disgrace the concept of intensive medical care . Please remember , finding fault could be same as finding facts .(At least in medical care )
Update ( February 24th, 2013 Sunday , 12.05 AM )
After 25 days of intensive and aggressive medical care we lost one of the great lives
of modern times which will be celebrated by his sons and daughters forever !
Mysteries in Medical Philosophy !
Posted in bio ethics, Quotes, Venkat quotes, tagged medical ethics, medical philosophy, modern medicine, waht ails modern medicine on May 18, 2012| Leave a Comment »
And the “sickness” award goes to . . . that frail man in check shirts with an extensive diabetic foot !
Posted in Uncategorized, tagged commerce in medicine, diabetes award, inappropriate medical care, medical ethics, medical profession, modern medicine, public hospitals, threat and treat on December 14, 2011| 1 Comment »
There were times medical profession’s only purpose was to take care of the sick . Modern principle of living has contaminated every walk of life .Medical profession leads by example in this race .
How can one justify celebrating a disease in a grand manner in public domain in the name of increased awareness ?
I am shocked to find an ad in a recent The Hindu Ad (25-11-2011)
Some of the words used are terrible and highly objectionable . It amounts to an insult to all diabetic patients.
- Diabetes award !
- Diabetic Carnival !
- Join us in the fun of diabetes !
- Glitz and glamor of diabetes!
- Festival of diabetes !
How can a patient celebrate his illness ?
I think the news paper which publish such ads should also show some sensitivity .
I agree there are lakhs of diabetic patients who do require intensive treatment but the fair held in the air conditioned corridors of a trade center is never going to address this issue.
( Can I ask these organizers to help and serve the real diabetic burden in ill equipped public hospitals across our state ? )
It is simply a commercial extravaganza creating a fear complex among the healthy , rich men and women and make a living
out of human anxiety .
Who sponsors these medical award nights ?
For those who are unaware of the games doctors and pharma companies play, here is a shocker – large amounts of money is pumped into such public events.
This is part of a larger board room strategies ( Can it be a conspiracy !) to increase the per capital consumption of drugs of our population . And no doubt doctors are integral part of this scheme with or without intention .
While MCI can penalize a individual doctor even for accepting a pen as gift from pharma company ,
they can do nothing but simply watch as millions are exchanged in the name research , health education , and awareness .
The height of the irony is , these events are sponsored by WHO and the world forums as well !
Ironically the doctrine of modern medicine seems to suggest . . .“Ethics is primarily for individual physicians and do not apply for institution ” This is the single most dangerous concept that is playing havoc with human health”
It closely mimics the principle of war justice . An individual shooting another individual is a definite crime , while multiple individuals killing multiple individuals is not a crime , it is a war !
Disclaimer
The author has no personal grudge against any hospital or organization instigation. It ‘s an expression against so many commercial activities that occur in the medical filed on day-to-day basis !
Sufferrings due to a Healthy heart !
Posted in Uncategorized, tagged healthy heart syndrome, modern medicine, prevention is better than cure, when prevention becomes a disease on February 5, 2011| Leave a Comment »
Healthy heart syndrome (HHS) . This is essentially a state of mind , being in constant worry that something will happen to their heart , in spite of having normal parameters.
HHS is a new age medical entity of the mankind . Here the heart suffers because of excessive knowledge , affluence and entry of market forces into health care .
- It is often a media driven frenzy . Having an insurance policy is the biggest risk factor
- May be cured after taking few scans and some times end up in invasive Angiograms or even a PCI
- In a few it takes a course of malignant anxiety disorder . Those afflicted indulge in daily BP check weekly cholesterol check , monthly cardiologist visit and yearly 64 slice CT scan.
- Curiously , the definite cure occurs only after they suffer a heart attack .This makes them less anxious as the inevitable has been experienced .
- There are occasions when too much anxiety (for not developing a heart problem !) will trigger a real event .
- Some of the medical institutions and health care providers are also part of the problem as many of them perpetuate the condition as they keep these vulnerable people (with healthy heart) guessing and do not fully disclose the reality .
- The incidence of HHS seems to be rampant as there are recurring instances of multiple stents deployed in apparently healthy hearts .
Final message : Let us suffer from disease not from health !
While , many patients with multiple blocks , bye -pass surgeries and half- functioning hearts , lead a near normal life , it is ironical , a substantial number suffer with HHS and inappropriate interventions .
Let us hope , modern medicine which goes deep into Nano medicines and bio Robotics look into this issue also !
Why many doctors* , consider patients as their property ?
Posted in bio ethics, cardiology-ethics, medical quotes, tagged corporate health care, cost of medical care, doctor patient relations, ethics in medicine, evidence based medicine, five star hospitals, hippocrates, modern medicine, poor patients on December 11, 2010| Leave a Comment »
Medical profession is the noblest of all ! . Doctors are akin to God in many ways ! They have the potential to remove the sufferings of mankind . These are the often made quotes about doctors for many centuries. Today’s medical professionals are , a strained lot to fulfil their role expected of them .They have to maintain the social identity and earn enough to sustain their image in society. The onslaught of commercial and pseudo-scientific concepts have ruined the profession considerably.
Those were the days when the family physician concept was flourishing , where in a doctor was taking care of entire family. This concept has taken a different avatar now .
Now a doctor feels , once the patient is seen by him becomes his/her patient rather a property! This perception has grown in a malignant manner , many doctors do not refer to a specialist even in deserving cases fearing patient poaching .
This possessiveness of doctors about their patients leads to many of the unethical behavior .
My case . . .my patient . . . my fees , . . .this sort of approach though appeared good in the past , is rapidly becoming a liability for the patients .Lack of organised health care by private and Government sector also amplifies the issue .It is pathetic to note , at least Govt hospitals have some accountability , majority of private health systems do not have mortality or morbidity auditing .
The my patient, my property doctrine is playing havoc in medical health delivery system .The following are the situations where a patient genuinely suffer due to this abnormal thinking pattern of many of the medical professionals today.
- When general practitioners want to have control of their patients even after referring them to big tertiary care centres.
- This is being encouraged by the corporate desk of big hospitals as they probably send financial benefits to the referring doctors. Hence doctors are worried their property may get lost during transit or inside the big hospital. There are instances , I have witnessed , where severe mitral stenosis are manged medically by some established physicians fearing that their property will be lost .
- Patients with severe angina are not offered angiogram and remain on medical treatment fearing loss of monthly consultation fees.
- When the care takers energy and thought process are consumed in many non academic activates one can expect how the illness can be taken care off.
- When investigations are ordered the primary referring doctor feels he is being denied of kick backs from costly investigations which is enjoyed bu the specialists .so these general practices what to finish of all required investigations in their desired lab and sent to the specialist.
- This has led to curious situations where a ENT surgeon calls for a 64 slice CT scan and obstetrician asking for MRI brain ( because the patient is theirs ! )
The sequale is two fold .
The specialist often gets annoyed and feel insulted to read an investigation ordered by a different physician( rather irrelevant physician !) done in a non friendly lab without incentives.
- Either he looks at it reluctantly
- Or orders fresh investigations
(Some physicians show extreme arrogance , as they call for fresh investigation even if the patient is having good quality , investigations with images done recently !)
Finally , the most dangerous thing
A patient once admitted under a doctor, the prescriptions and procedures are often controlled by the admitting doctor .We have seen a pathetic situation of plastic surgeon admitting a rheumatic heart disease and trying to manage with the help of telephoning consultations with a cardiologist .
There is a chaotic discipline in ordering Investigations and treatment modalities in our country .Any one can order any thing they want .In this scenerio, abberrant patient behavir leads to further complications as patients themself decide what investigations they want.
What is the solution* ?
The concept of family physician is still a best option . It has to be continued. There need to be a proper referral services into well equipped, staffed , audited institution in every district and counties either controlled by Government or well-regulated. private bodies . The financial remuneration for the doctors should be constant and fixed irrespective of the form treatment they provide.
In other words the entire health care delivery should be centralised and institutionalised .The need for specialist to be assessed properly and care should be rationed .
Consider this anarchic situation – An asymptomatic, incidentally detected 30 % PDA lesion in a rich, bed ridden , old man is stented by a 3rd generation drug electing stent in a corporate hospital, while many young Indians with a productive life with critical left main .proximal LAD is allowed die in peace .
Where are our medical economists and health care planners hiding ? ! And we are talking about billion dollar medical tourism industry .
A general practitioner should receive same amount as consultation as a neurosurgeon or cardiologist .If we divide the doctor into different grades according to the knowledge and place of work , the lesser doctors will find someway to equalize their earning with their superior colleagues.
After all , all doctors take the same oath . . . A doctor who treats a febrile convulsion in a remote village by administering a timely diazepam injection can not be considered unequal to a Cleveland neurosurgeon who clips a AV malformation in the circle of Willis to terminate recurrent convulsion in a similar child .
* One would tend to think , these solutions are highly theoretical not implementable in today’s world. But trying to bring order to a dysfunctional medical care delivery system is not a crime any way !
Final message
Most doctors continue to be noble and dedicated. But the faith in them is rapidly eroding .This is becoming a dangerous trend . They can not to be blamed in isolation. It is the dynamics of social and economic scenario that are driving the medical profession in a journey towards a commercial extravaganza , where humane care is as obsolete as a Mediterranean dinosaur !
Now young doctors are readily manufactured in the countryside (Not my merit , but bought as commodities akin to real estate) . A three bed room flat and a MBBS seat roughly costs equal in India !
There is no wonder then , doctors will treat their degrees and patients as precious property . Nothing wrong to consider them as their property , but let them handle the property with at most concern , faith and trust !
Disclaimer *This article does not intend to defame any doctor or medical profession . It aims to encourage a wider debate on the issue . This is about many physicians which we come across everyday in our towns and cities .This article may be irrelevant in many other countries and to those physicians working in a completely institutionalised health care delivery system including Govt .hospitals where the collective care (or is it collective no care ?) is the norm .
Why doctors are referred to as “Practicing” Medicine
Posted in bio ethics, cardiology-ethics, general medicine, Uncategorized, tagged art of practice of medcine, bio ethics, doctor patient relationship, ethics in cardiology, ethics in medicine, experimental medicine, hippocrates, medcial ethics, modern medicine, patient vs physician, principle of practice of medicine, why medicine is not science on August 1, 2010| Leave a Comment »
It is often quoted “Practice makes every one perfect” . . . Doctors continue to practice for ever . . .If practice is only a rehearsal , when do they perform for real ?
And , we know a doctor spends his entire life time practicing . . . In other words doctors are only experimenting .
So , do not get fooled by his errors . Errors are bound to happen during their practicing sessions !
The problem with general public is , they never understand this basic fact – medical science is nothing but a , on going research on human body .If only we understand this we can accept the millions of medical mistakes* that occur every day in the global medical profession . The major aim of modern medical science is to reduce that .
* Of course, negligence is a punishable offense . But, we should also realise , non- negligent medical mistakes are many fold higher than negligent ones .
While a careful doctor will avoid negligent mistakes a thinking doctor will avoid non -negligent mistakes also.
This puts onus back on doctors. We need to critically analyse , every
treatment modality we follow .
If you are a strong believer of “Medicine is indeed a science and doctors are scientists ” , please read this article from British medical journal and conclude yourself.
http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/328/7454/0-h
Further reading
The bestseller How doctors think
Picture courtesy : Jupeter stock Images
Guideline violations in cardiology practice : Every body does it , so do I !
Posted in Cardiology -Interventional -PCI, cardiology- coronary care, cardiology-ethics, tagged cto, drsvenkatesan, ebm, ethics in cardiology, evidence based medicine, medicine, modern medicine, pci, ptca, statins on August 24, 2008| Leave a Comment »
All is not well, that ends well !
Treatment guidelines in cardiology practice are periodically published by ACC/AHA/ESC.These guidelines represent the current scientific practice. They are called some times as recommendations. Medical professionals tend to adhere to this guidelines whenever possible.They are not legally binding in most of the countries.In USA some states believe it, to be legally binding.
The problem with these guidelines are , they are classified as class 1 ,class 2 , class 3 recommendations.
Class 1, A drug , device or a procedure Is definitely useful and must be prescribed.
Class 3, A drug , device or a procedure Is not useful and should not be used .
Class 2*, A drug , device or a procedure may be useful or may be harmful , and hence may be used or may not be used . (Vaguest possible guideline!)
*Altered to convey the meaning
What are the guideline violations that can be sued in court of law ?
A person with established CAD who is not been prescribed a statin (Cholesterol lowering drug) can be sued straight away, even if the patient has no adverse outcome due to the nonprescription of that drug. The issue here is , the doctor has not prescribed a drug which has proven benefit .The law is clear on that .Most will agree that, the doctor is at fault , and he is never protected even by their colleagues .He can’t defend his action.
What are the medical errors that can never* be sued in court of law !
But the same doctor who opens up a totally occluding coronary artery in an asymptomatic patient(CTO -chronic total occlusion) and lands up in a complication and the patient dies. This could be major guideline violation as opening a CTO in an incidentally detected , asymptomatic patient is a class 3 recommendation. Neither the physician, patient , institution nor the regulatory authorities bother about this even though there is strong case for censure , in reality it never happens. Number of experts from leading hospitals do this procedure in live work shop all over the world with full media glare, It is an irony the same experts are only writing in their guidelines that these procedures should not be done inappropriately.
And this medical error ( Should we call it a crime if it is knowingly done ! ) keeps growing as the physician never feels guilty about it .
The message here is
A physician of a state of the art hospital, in a scientifically advanced country goes scott free and guilt free even if he openly violate the scientific guidelines and do a inappropriate procedure that result in a patient death. Mean while a small time physician in a remote place in the same country can be taken to task for not prescribing a officially recommended drug (By standard guidelines) .He will be labelled unscientific and unethical even if his non prescription , had not caused any untoward health outcome .
In short , in today’s modern medical practice
Even a ” Minor error of ommision” attracts guilt and perceived fear among the physicians. Meanwhile many of the ” Major errors of commission” done by professionals are rarely frowned upon and thus these mistakes continue to perpetuate !
*There should be a strong provision in medical law to address the issue of inappropriate procedures even if the procedure has not resulted any untoward effect to the patient.










