
Posts Tagged ‘dr s venkatesan’
Forbidden quotes in medicine : Healing shall prevail over harming
Posted in Uncategorized, tagged bmj, british journal of medical ethics, dr s venkatesan, ethics in medicine, famous quotes on medical ethics, Hippocratic oath, indian journal of medical ethics, lancet, madras medical college, medical education, modern medicine, nejm, venkatesan sangareddi, world health organisation on April 9, 2026|
What is the purpose of “24-hour” upper limit cut off in the pharmaco invasive strategy ?
Posted in Uncategorized, tagged acc, dr s venkatesan, esc, extended pharmaco invasive strategy, fast mi trial, madras medical college, pharmaco Invasive strategy, primarypci, stemi, stemi nstemi guidelines, stream trial, why 3 to 24 hour time window in pharmaco invasive strategy on March 30, 2026|
Why 3-24h ?
The famous & popular 3-24 hr time window for pharmaco-invasive strategy (PIPCI) was adopted, blindly from STREAM (prehospital Tenecteplase + PCI <6-24h in <3h presenters) and FAST-MI trials assuming uniform IRA patency. It fails to stress the importance Initial time window to lysis, and its response . This makes the distinction between true rescue vs routine pharmaco invasive PCI a hazy excercise . Thus, both inappropriately delayed or a hastily-routine PCI has become all too common.
The 24-hour upper cutoff in pharmacoinvasive strategy serves to prevent reocclusion, or to address any residual mechanical stenosis . It is not meant for myocardial salvage, which is irrelevant if lysis was successful.
Mind you, IRA optimisation is not a time bound emergency in a well recannalised vesseel. In fact, PCI is not an absolute neccesity for long term IRA patency especially if it an coronary erosion. If there is TIMI 3 flow ,and there is little ischemic substrate , there is no need to chase the , supposedly sacred 24 hr time window. If the lysis achieves complete( or almost complete) IRA patency, PCI can safely be extended to 48-72 hours, or even permanent deferral (No-PCI , stand alone thrombolysis) in stable patients with optimal medical therapy.
An interesting study is published , from my institute in the current issue of AJC with a title ” Extended Pharmacoinvasive PCI Compared to Primary PCI: Insights From Madras Medical College STEMI Registry” . This study argues for extending the time window for pharmacoinvasive strategy to 48 hrs. (It could still be higher.) It suggests , this flexibility suits the LMIC, due to logistical realities. ( Glad to be listed as a co-athour)

Link to the PDF of the article
I am sure, this study, demands to reset the 24 hr upper limit of cut off for pharmaco invasive strategy.Looking beyond this study, there is an urgent need to clarify the specifc purpose of the generalised time window of “3 to 24” hr time window in pharmaco invasive strategy.
A call for new sub defintions in the time windows in PIPCI
1.Successful Lysis* (TIMI 2-3, in about 70%): Routine angiography/PCI 3-24h (prevent reocclusion/residual stenosis) .Extendable to 48-72h + is possibel. Permanent deferral if the pateint and myocardiumare , with a patent IRA . (Implying no need for further salvage at all , we should allow a green corridor for patients with successful standalone thromolysis to exit the hospital without a PCI ) Doing a PCI onlu t0 prevent fear of reocclusion in the first 30 days is not backed with good data.
2.Failed Lysis* (TIMI 0-1, 30%): Rescue PCI immediately (<3-6h post-lysi, like PPCI) Here the time window should be hastened and can never afford to extend it, at any stretch of imagination.
* Ironically, the 24hr cut of has no place in both the above subsets. (May be in failed lysis , 24 hr cut off might apply , again it is 12 hr longer than primary PCI )
Final message
“Time is no longer muscle , if the Intial lysis is successful“
What is the purpose of “24-hour” upper limit cut of time in pharmaco invasive strategy ? The 24 hr is not universally valid. Pharmaco Invasive strategy time windows need to be based on timing and efficacy of the Initial lysis.
Postamble
Commenting this paper as a third person :
One limitation in this study is to be admitted. I think, the generalised comparative efficacy of extended PIPCI with primary PCI can not be made, for the simple reason, the extension of time window is possible only in patients who had successful lysis. This study may ideally be concluded as “3-24h pharmacoinvasive PCI can be extended to 48h if the initial lysis successful” . Further, If initial lysis fails (30% TIMI 0-1), any extension is contraindicated and requires immediate rescue PCI akin to PPCI. Also, data regarding non-IRA intervention might help understand the importance of the extension of the time window better.
Many second opinions might be wrong too … consume it with caution !
Posted in Uncategorized, tagged appropriate procedure, bio ethics, bmj, british journalmof medcial ethcis, clinical decision making, dr s venkatesan, esc, inappropriate interventions, lancet, madras medical college, medcial decsion making, medcial errors, medcial ethics, medical education, medical incompetence, nejm, pateint empowerment, principles of practice of medicine, private vs public health, second opinion, third opionion, venkatesan sangareddi, what ails modern medicine on March 8, 2026|
Getting a second opinion from another expert is a valuable option for our patients when they face a complex decision-making process, especially when a cardiac intervention is advised. No doubt, it is their fundamental rights too.But this could be hard, if the second opinion is sought regarding indication for coronary or interventional procedure.
It is much, much comfortable to concur with the original decision if it is pro -Intervention. (even if it is against your conscience). Vetoing a procedure which was advised by some big hospitals is almost impossible for cardiologists sitting at their office, however experienced they may be. This is because it is sort of going against, the mainstream and defying science as well. Both doctors and physicians are stuck.
I confront such situations often from patients following elite cardiology consults. I had been forthright and genuine and said a firm no or yes to many such procedures . I understood much later, that only a minority of the patients followed my No advice , while invariably they accepted my yes.
After much confabulations , recently, I have made some recalibarations on my values, (decent term for compromise ) despite all the ethical stuff I write in these columns. But, three things I ensure , before giving my opinion which goes against my assessment.
“This procedure is not indicated in the true scientific and moral sense, but 1.If you lack full trust, or 2. If you are not ready to accept the risks of not doing it, or 3. If the fear (of not doing it ), would nag you constantly, then get it done as per the advice of the big guys”.
Final message
Until we acquire the courage to express our true opinion , we certainly fall under the tag of medically incompetent.
Very soon, getting a second* or even third opinion may not really matter. Doctors are silently persuaded to follow the guidelines thursted by big scientific syndicates along with compulsion to go with patient wish & preference.
*Caution and clarification
Second clinical opinion for helping to arrive at a medical diagnosis is of immense value and a great thing to do. In fact, doctors themselves ask for it when they are in doubt. This article is about second opinion regarding the appropriateness of various interventional procedures that is defining modern medicine.
What is the realistic definition for “fact vs fake” news
Posted in Uncategorized, tagged bmj, dr s venkatesan, expressions in cardiology, fake vs fact in medical science, jama network, lancet, madras medical college, medical education, medical ethics, nejm, quotes in medical ethics, venkatesan sangareddi on November 18, 2025|
Defining optimism is not an easy task in science.
Posted in cardiology -Therapeutics, Ethics in Medicine, tagged dr s venkatesan, dr venkatesan sangareddi, ethics, optimism, optimism vs pessimism, optimist, positive vs negative thinking, venkat quotes, venkatesan sangareddi, widom quotes on April 9, 2025|
Why prosthetic mitral valve DVI increase with obstruction, while Aortic valve DVI, decreases?
Posted in Uncategorized, tagged aortic and mitral dvi, dopper velocity index, dr s venkatesan, dvi, echocardiography doppler bernouli equation, esc acc jase, madras medcial college, prosthetic valve assessment, vti, why mitral valve dvi increase with obstruction ? on December 23, 2024|


Final message
Prosthetic valve assessment is complex, thought process intensive examination. Not every echocardiographer can do it efficiently. It needs a good knowledge of anatomy, physiology of inter & Intra valvular hemodynamics .It demands thorough understanding of principles of Doppler echocardiography and also the hidden truths( ie, How we take liberty with the mighty Bernoulli equation for granted )
In spite of the number of imaging and doppler parameters we are able to gather ,still, we need to analyze them with reference to the clinical presentation. Mind you, even an innocuous episode of fever, associated dyspnea, and tachycardia can elevate the mitral gradient and sound a false alarm.
Depending solely on prosthetic valve gradients to diagnose obstruction is the biggest error we commit. We have seen this, even from elite hospitals. Echocardiography is not the final say, one may require cine fluoroscopy, CT scan or even PET (Infected peri prosthetic abscess) in appropriate situations.
Reference


AI in Cardiology: Was the past perfect …is the future tense?
Posted in Uncategorized, tagged AI in cardiology, artificial intelligence, dr s venkatesan, drsvenkatesan, madras medical college on June 11, 2024|
This is a condensed video version of PPT slides of my recent presentation.Please pardon, there is no audio as of now. Will make a voice-over and post soon.
Topic : AI in cardiology
Occasion: Prof Rathnavelu Subramanian memory oration. Cardiological Society of India Chennai.
Date : 8-06-2024
Acknowledgment & Courtesy: Images and videos from open source
Time to tweak the definition of “Professional incompetence” in medical practice.
Posted in Uncategorized, tagged artificial intelligence, dr s venkatesan, dr venkatesan sangareddi, future of medical ethics, gene therapy, hippocrates, journal of medical ethics, lown foundation, madras medical college, medical ethics, medical quotes, nano medicine, nejm bmj lancet, noble profession, principles of practice of medicine, quotes medical ethics best, sir william osler on January 28, 2020|
“Non academic” Tips and tricks in CTO – PCI : Open sesame ! , Show me your treasures !
Posted in cardiology -Therapeutics, Cath lab Hardware, cath lab tips and tricks, cto chronic total occlusion, tagged absolute refractory period, Best guideline on cto pci, cart reverse cart, chronic total occlsuion, cross boss sting ray, cto club, CTO club euro, cto euro club, cto japan club, cto mmc chennai madras medical college, decision cto trial drsvenkatesan, dr s venkatesan, ethical guidelines in cardiology, ethical issues in cto, management strategies in chronic total occlusion, see saw technique, tips and tricks for cto opening on November 27, 2017| Leave a Comment »
We know, The Mysterious Alibaba cave opens with a voice password . . . legend tell us it had unlimited hidden treasures. It would appear , CTOs mimic the cave in several ways. What is inside ? Should we open it ? Can we come out safely ? Do we have any magical password in cath lab to get across the complex tissue boulders ?, every cardiologist would love to have one !

Dear CTO,Open Sesame . . . I have come with all the wires you love ! Please let me in !
Indication
“CTOs are never an emergency . . .but please realise we can very easily create one while resuscitating a dead snake !
Don’t think hard on evidence , then , you may not do a single case of CTO in your life .Forget all those pessimistic trials like OAT,COAT, etc and the recent ones DECISION-CTO. Ignore all guidelines. Ask your patient, and his insurance company , if they are willing , reserve the cath lab and get ready.
Pre-procedure planning
Spend at least a hour to analyse the CTO Imagery one day prior and create n action plan.
Keep knowledgeable staff for assisting , but never ask for fellow colleagues help because it hurts our ego ! Cardiac surgeon’s back up is a welcome addition even if it’s on paper.
If possible , try to ask the patient genuinely ,what is his symptom at least once ! before starting the procedure.
Timing of the procedure.
Don’t post a CTO patient either on a busy Monday morning or lazy Friday afternoon.
Hardware Inventory
The wires ,catheters, the balloons form the essential tool box .There is more than a handful of coronary automobile companies manufacture this .It is all about metallurgy , knowledge of wires, catheters , and tip thickness, (Bullet shaped as in Asahi ) , slipping , hydrophophic or philic, polymer coating , trackability, pushability , memory etc etc.
Guide wire tip morphology is as Important as the Lesion characteristics !
Analysis of the lesion (Probably most important)
Unlike conventional PCI we have no initial target.We need to poke first and find the target next ! Distal vessel status is most important ( Careful review of retrograde filling through collaterals could give more information than CT angiograms .Calcification, diffuse disease can be a real hurdle)
Lesion morphology
Softness of lesion has to be felt (Requires good wire which has sensor (Paccinian corpuscles and Merckle disc ideal ?) I guess the cortical tactile feel is as vital as the intervention expertise .I know at least one diabetic colleague of mine who finds it difficult to cross a CTO and admits he never found it easy to feel the lesion through the wires . Autonomic dysfunction ?)
Operator expertise
(Note: These are like reading swimming guidelines , you can’t learn in the shores reading books ! you have to plunge !)
Many techniques are proposed .Sequential approach (Ironically experts are licensed to use specialized wired wires directly .Beginners are advised to go with non specialized hardware and escalate step by step) Some centers are blessed with new age weapons like cross Boss and sting ray that confront the lesions in multiple frontiers. (Carpet bombing?)

CTO playground. : Its essentially a coronary contact sport with expert septal surfing , tunnelling, knuckling , kneeling , bending . Of course , It can end up in a gratifying win in few , still most of us tend to play this game without a goal (post !) Source of the Image : Unknown Due credits to the creator.
They are basically about poking the head of the lesion and trying to cross an occluded vessel millimeter by mm towards the presumed distal vessel in an Imaginary trajectory. Proximal cap, central core ,the blind tunnel , distal capsule and exit points each must be successfully conquered.
CTO crossing is the ultimate capacity of the operator to realise and feel the position of the wires in true lumen and their confidence levels in their conviction!
Multiple wires up to three are used some times to poke the lesion two of them are used to shut the false tracks and the other one is expected to enter the true lumen (Looks too good on theory !) . These are referred to in as many terms like parallel wire see-saw , CART ,Reverse CART etc .Retrograde techniques do help us but has no magic solutions.The lumen contrast , guide wire tip movement and its side branch entry would help.
Tacking complication :Always anticipate , it’s not negative mind set to look for it !
Keep pericardiocentesis kit , covered stents , micro snares and other retrieval devices ready in cart. Your support staff should be well versed with what is happening around them. Some of the dye leaks and stains are safe .They imply minor perforations that form sealed hematomas (The plane of perforations also matters. myocardial (ab-pericardial ) leaks are well tolerated .Distal perforations are also safe as long as CTO is not opened ) Online echocardiography should be readily available to monitor pericardial space leak.
When bleed into pericardial space is life threatening , A comical, but life saving option is to close the artery and restore the CTO its original state and come out of the lab quietly !
Newer Imaging guidance : Can be useful , still may not matter much when considering the interventional acumen .
CTO PCI : Time as therapeutic end point.
CTO is not an endless game with out time frame .In my opinion it shouldn’t cross 45 minutes each as in a soccer game with a brief strategic time out and of course with liberal use of ,yellow and red cards
Future directions
Japanese are the ones who pioneered CTO Interventions . We expect more Innovations ! Is it the forward looking IVUS ? It is akin to tunneling for underground metro train with GPS guiding .If you can mark the proximal and distal points , rest will be be taken care by mortised self tunneling catheters from Robotic arms steered by sophisticated algorithms.
Final message
CTO PCI remains a real Interventional challenge. We are often double blinded in both directions (antegrade as well as retrograde ). Needs much effort ,time, hardware and most importantly a non fatigued mind and body. The benefits we get may vary between gratifying to outright mediocre .Of course , it surely satisfies operator ego and express pride and courage !
Is crossing and stenting a CTO synonymous with true success ?
Yes it is , for the cardiologist and the hospital . . . I’m not sure about it for the patient !
In this sense , CTOs mimic the mysterious Alibaba cave that tempts us with Imaginary treasures but can trap us with a wrong password !
Post-Ample
* Who should CTO PCI ?
I have seen young , enthusiastic cardiologists with Immature support staff attempting CTO in remote sub- urban settings ! Though patience and expertise are essential ingredients, some amount of organised training and hardwares make CTO PCI safe and effective. Enthusiasm and affordability alone can’t be an Indication for this complex set of coronary lesions.
Reference
I still wonder why this vital paper was never published , it was just presented in the Annual ACC conference March 2017







