Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for the ‘cardiology congenital heart disese’ Category

Ventricular septal defect(VSD) is one the commonest congenital heart disease . Right from the days of Gasul , Abbot, and Keith we have analysed the natural history for nearly a century . VSD is an intriguing congenital heart disease where a child can develop a florid cardiac failure within weeks of birth in one end to a totally asymptomatic adult with a benign cardiac acoustics defect (Namely a systolic murmur in the left parasternal area.) But for this murmur , the patient would be labeled absolutely healthy.

 In between these two spectra is the huge population of VSD that gets closed spontaneously. A rough estimate says 60 % of all small VSDs get closed by age 10 .

So ,what we are supposed to do once a child is diagnosed of VSD ?

Should we close or should we wait ?

The indication for closing a VSD is discussed elsewhere ( Read this link )

 What are the factors that determine VSD closure ?

  • The size
  • The site
  • Age of the child
  • The Rim morphology
  • Associated lesions*
  • Hemodynamic stress
  • Inherent tissue factors
  • Infection **

* Associated defects like PDA, RVOT obstruction are strong deerrants against spontaneous closure

General rules of VSD closure

 Size

VSDs <5mm have great chance of closing Large VSD > 1cm is rarely get closed .

Supracristal VSDs located sub arterially are immune to spontaneous closure however small the size is .

Location & Site

 VSDs that are located exclusively within the membranous septum rarely close . VSDs which are located in the perimembranous area (With at least 50% circumference is fenced by muscular or trabecular septum has the greatest potential to close by natural forces.)

Isolated muscular VSD if large can not get closed . Inlet VSD has anatomical difficulty to get closed.

Rim Morphology

 Small muscular VSDs have a potential to close , but it is believed differential cellular lining of VSD rims (Eg : A combination of muscle, membrane , is more likely to close .)

 Process of tissue growth As the child grows the it is expected the heart will outgrow the lesion . This is thought to be the commonest mode of VSD closure. As the IVS mass increases as he child grows it brings he rims together . But logic would suggest unless some degree of neocardiac proliferation occur a VSD may never get closed completely .

Some times even large VSDs try to close with the help of the neighboring structures like septal tricuspid valve leaflet . Indeed this can be the dominate mode of closure in many. This can induce a tricuspid regurgitation .

**Role of infection

Paradoxically an episode of infective endocaditis in the edges of VSD accelerate the process of approximation of tissue plane and healing .

 Relation with Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH)

 Once PAH sets in the VSD never gets closed spontaneously , This may be due to all VSDs that result in PAH has to be significantly large

 Can a VSD get larger progressively?

In physics and hydraulics a hole under hemodynamic stress is destined to progress In human biology this is thought to be rare .Post MI VSRs can behave in an unpredictable manner as he edges of the defect a often softened and prone for tissue plane dissection and extension .

Why some VSDs never close ?

It is clear , size and location matters the most , but there are other issues some of them may be unique tissue properties .

Why is it important to know the biology of VSD closure ?

In this era of interventional cardiology we are using mechanical devices to close VSDs and ASDs .It is fraught with many technical issues. If there is a biological glue or membrane that can be delivered by catheter to close small VSDs or ASDs .

 So for no therapeutic approach to hasten the natural closure of these defects has been practiced .Further research is required to explore the cellular adhesiveness and help accelerate closure of these defects.

Read Full Post »

Coronary artery anomalies are relatively common . It can be either in it’s origin, course ,  or termination etc.

There are two major sub groups.

  1. Anomalies associated with other congenital heart diseases (Both cyanotic and acyanotic)
  2. Isolated coronary artery anomalies .

The second category  which we encounter in cath labs frequently  does not have major implications . RCA and LCA arising  away from it’s respective sinuses ,Separate origin for LCX, or conus, RCA from left sinus or a high take off of RCA are the common anomalies.

While  coronary anomalies are commonly associated  in complex congenital heart disease (TOF, DORV, TGV, etc )

Isolated  complex anomalies of coronary arteries are extremely  rare

This happens , when one coronary artery arises from pulmonary artery instead of aorta and   it becomes a fascinating disease !

The ALCAPAs  and ARCAPAs

When the LCA originates from PA it becomes a  rare cause  of  left to right shunt .it is referred to anomalous origin of LCA from PA (ALCAPA) .

The ALCAPA is many times common than the “ARCAPA”

We report a case of ARCAPA (Anomalous orgin of RCA from PA )

The unique features of ARCAPA  could be

  • Isolated ARCAPA is very rare.
  • Only a handful of  patients reported in literature
  • These children present with more of right heart failure as RV function is compromised .
  • A continuous murmur in 2nd LSCS without cyanosis gives a clue
  • Angina is rare unlike ALCAPA
  • Mitral regurgitation is uncommon as LV function is relatively intact.
  • The q waves in V5 V6 we see in ALCAPA is conspicuous by it’s absence
  • ARCAPA is often ssociated with bicuspid aortivc valve, VSD etc
  • Left to right shunting can be significant .
  • 64 slice MDCT is a great investigation in this entity
  • Surgical ostial transfer is preferred so as to restore twin coronary circulation

Image and video of the ARCAPA will be uploaded shortly

Reference

1 http://asianannals.ctsnetjournals.org

2 http://ats.ctsnetjournals.org

3 http://ats.ctsnetjournals.org

Read Full Post »

                                               The superior aspect of   coronary sinus and a portion of the left atrium share a common wall .Embryological defects in this area result in a communication between left atrium and coronary sinus. This defect  descriptively called as unroofed coronary sinus .This entity is most commonly associated with persistent left SVC. Extreme form of unroofing is some times termed as absent coronary sinus.

How to diagnose it ?

A high degree of anticipation is necessary in all patients with ASD or LSVC. A dilated coronary sinus in routine echocardiography warrants full investigation. A contrast echocardiography with agitated saline injection in left cubital vein will clinch the diagnosis as contrast enters LA after opacifying the dilated coronary sinus. During  right heart catheterisation catheter course entering coronary sinus and  advancing into LA through the fenestrations (Unroofing)  will confirm the defect.

How do you classify unroofed coronary sinus ?

The morphologic type of URCS was classified as Kirklin and Barratt-Boyes

 Type   I, completely unroofed with LSVC;

 Type II, completely unroofed without LSVC;

 Type III, partially unroofed midportion;

 Type IV, partially unroofed terminal portion

What is the clinical relevance of this entity ?

This entity should be suspected in every patient with persistent LSVC, ( and LSVC should be suspected in every patient with ASD). The hemodynamics is that of an ASD but if sufficient mixing of LSVC blood and LA blood takes place the child will have mild cyanosis.Some times when the coronary sinus is totally absent it will present as a typical dusky ASD picture which can closely mimic a TAPVC clinically.

Surgeons have a greater role in recognising and treating this entity. A typical repair will be done like this

 

Links to some of interesting articles on this topic

Raghib circulation 1965

Read Full Post »

« Newer Posts