Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Posts Tagged ‘thrombolysis in st depresion’

Thrombolysis is specifically indicated when there is  ST elevation in ECG. ST elevation is a surrogate marker for  total coronary occlusion. It occurs due to current of injury flowing   towards* the lead  facing the  infarct territory . There is only one situation where you can safely and effectively administer thrombolysis in the presence of ST depression ie

Note : There is no accepted terminology  to label a MI as  ST depression MI . Here it is used to emphasise ST elevation is not the only indication for thrombolysis .In posterior MI there is infact ST elevation but it is failed to pick up by standard 12 lead ECG.

NSTEMI is a different entity altogether and  thromolysis is never indicated.

Isolated ST depression in V1 V2 V3 .It almost always indicate isolated posterior STEMI. This can be confirmed by posterior chest ECG leads V7-V10 .

*One will be surprised, to know  the mechanism of ST elevation in STEMI is still not fully elucidated .Technically speaking the net movement of current is away from electrode as  there is only a baseline  diastolic shift  which  gets neutralised in systole  mimicking an ST elevation .(Electro-optical illusion !)

How sensitive is these leads to detect isolated posterior STEMI  ?

Fairly sensitive. Both scapula and  para spinal muscles can be a  significant electrical  barrier that can prevent ST elevation from inscribed .In case of doubtful ST elevation in posterior leads , mit is always better to rely on the clinical presentation.Acute chest pain , consistent with ACS and a new onset ST depression >2mm V1 to v3 is a definite indication for thrombolysis .

Link between posterior MI and RV MI ?

They are closely linked entities .In fact posterior surface of heart is contributed significantly by RV.

What is the angiographic correlation of  isolated ST depression in V1 to V3 ?

It almost always localise the lesion to left circumflex artery . If it is dominant , it can involve lateral and RV territories.

Is isolated posterior MI  less dangerous ?

May be yes , but only after the patient reaches the hospital as electrical risk is same in every STEMI .

The area of infarct  is less , LV failure is less common. While conduction disorders and ischemic mitral regurgitation   can occur  significantly.

Also read ,  Why thrombolysis is contraindicated in UA/NSTEMI ? in this blog

Read Full Post »