• Home
  • Aim of this blog

Dr.S.Venkatesan MD

Expressions in cardiology

Feeds:
Posts
Comments
« Localising “Angina related artery”( ARA ) in UA/NSTEMI : Can we differentiate culprit artery from lesion ?
Whenever my ego bloats up . . . I see this video, to get it deflated ! »

FAQs in STEMI : Why is the 3 hour gap recommended before pharmaco Invasive strategy?

August 14, 2019 by dr s venkatesan

Background STEMI knowledge check : Evidence-based Ignorance

I think , It is unfortunate, In the management of STEMI , the two popular strategies of myocardial reperfusion is made to fight with each other as if they are perennial enemies for over two decades. Suddenly, someone with a rare coronary insight thought, why fight each other , they can have a friendly hug and work together. That brought the concept of pharmco -Invasive approach or strategy(PIA) backed up by STREAM, FAST-MI, and TRANSFER AMI studies.Yes, it appears to work well and devoid of all the early adverse events of pPCI. (Much to the dismay of ardent fans of Primary PCI )

*May I add one more shocker of a fact . Deep subset data mining from the above trials did show very early lysis may even act as a perfect stand-alone therapy negating the need for acutely one pharmaco Invasive PCI altogether.(Which was never published) Don’t get alarmed the concept is nothing but , the good old lysis , followed by leisure & elective Ischemia guided PCI in all uncomplicated STEMI.

Now coming to the FAQ in Cardiology Boards: Why is the time window for PIA is 3 to 24 hrs ?

The simple answer for an uncomplicated fellow is “published studies have shown benefit only in this time window. If you do PCI early (,<3h) after lysis paradoxically both bleeding and pro-thrombotic complication over the stented lesions are more common. The upper limit is 24 hrs , since by that time we lose all the potential for myocardial salvage”

– End-

Larger version of the answer

(Advanced readers who are willing to get confused, may read further)

1. Lysis and immediate PCI doesn’t go well at least in trial world. (FINESSE study, by Ellis et all NEJM 2008) Though cardiologists tend to blame lysis (effect of) to Interfere with their hand skills, it can very well be the opposite. The PCI undo the true benefit of lysis. For cardiologists to accrue maximum benefit in the early time window, they need to be too fast, in the process, they accelerate and fuse adverse events of both modalities.

2. The time window 3 to 24h could simply be evidence-based empiricism. In the major STREAM trial, invasive limb happened between 6 and 16 hours only. We stretched both in the top and bottom in the time clock and made it 3 to 24 hours with other trial data.

3. One realistic reason could be this. It requires a minimum of three hours for a patient to reach a place of coronary Invasion after lysis. So one may argue its time allowance for transport .It comes in handy at times.

4 .If the patient reaches earlier, we need to delay the PCI intentionally to please the evidence based medicine. Mind you, every minute delay increases the chance of no reflow as the microvasculature goes for edematous and porous death.

5. Please note, the time window for pharmaco Invasive strategy will go for a tail spin if the initial lysis is failed. Here, we have to rush I guess. Mind you, In this situation, the evidence based blaming that early PCI increases the adverse events immediately following lysis goes topsy turvy . This is where , we should recall old studies of routine rescue PCI (without clinical criteria) rarely succeeded to correct failed thrombolysis (SWIFT trial)

6.Now, why not PCI after 24hrs? The game can be played reversed if you document ongoing Ischemia in IRA or Non IRA, one may do it . The problem arises when the flawed thought process of a cardiologist could legally justify all PCI beyond 24 h /class 3 Indication after STEMI.The argument goes like this. I think this patient has residual silent Ischemia in- spite of severe LV dysfunction (Suspicion is the justification, to which ,unfortunately no one can dispute) It only suggests open artery hypothesis is still trying to raise from the graveyard more than a decade after its near burial.

Final message

To all those energetic, evidence-based cardiac physicians, we all know coronary care is all about time. In fact, we need to be blessed much more than a sense of time. There is something called medically( or spontaneously )stabilized ACS.  Please realise , “timely and safe intervention” for your patients could simply mean either playing the time button slow/ fast / slow or fast forward / pause or simply shutdown the cath lab, reach home early and enjoy some music or movie in your favorite streaming player.

Reference

1.Ellis SG, Tendera M, De Belder MA, FINESSE Investigators Facilitated PCI in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 2008;358(21):2205–2217. [PubMed]

2. Armstrong PW, Gershlick AH, Goldstein STREAM Investigative Team Fibrinolysis or primary PCI in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 2013;368(15):1379–1387. [PubMed]

3. Danchin N, Puymirat E, Steg PG, T, on behalf of the FAST-MI 2005 investigators Five-year survival in patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction according to modalities of reperfusion therapy: the French Registry on Acute ST-Elevation and Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (FAST-MI) 2005 Circulation. 2014;129(16):1629–1636. [PubMed]

4. Cantor WJ, Fitchett D, Borgundvaag B, TRANSFER-AMI Trial Investigators Routine early angioplasty after fibrinolysis for acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 2009;360(26):2705–2718.. [PubMed]
5.. Bonnefoy E, Steg PG, Boutitie F, , CAPTIM Investigators Comparison of primary angioplasty and pre-hospital fibrinolysis in acute myocardial infarction (CAPTIM) trial: a 5-year follow-up. Eur Heart J. 2009;30(13):1598–1606. . [PubMed]

Rate this:

Share this:

  • LinkedIn
  • WhatsApp
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Email

Like this:

Like Loading...

Related

Posted in acute coronary syndrome, Cardiology - Animations, Cardiology -Interventional -PCI, Cardiology -unresolved questions, cath lab tips and tricks, Infrequently asked questions in cardiology (iFAQs), open artery hypothesis, STEMI, STEMI -Managment, STEMI-Primary PCI, Thrombolysis | Tagged pharmaco Invasive strategy, primary PCI vs thrombolysis, reperfusion strategies, stream fast mi captim transfer mi trials, why 3 to 24 hour time window for pharmaco invasive approch |

  • Categories

  • Archives

    • January 2023 (7)
    • December 2022 (3)
    • November 2022 (5)
    • October 2022 (5)
    • September 2022 (4)
    • August 2022 (3)
    • July 2022 (9)
    • June 2022 (2)
    • May 2022 (1)
    • April 2022 (2)
    • March 2022 (1)
    • February 2022 (3)
    • January 2022 (7)
    • December 2021 (3)
    • November 2021 (5)
    • October 2021 (8)
    • September 2021 (4)
    • August 2021 (6)
    • July 2021 (6)
    • June 2021 (7)
    • May 2021 (5)
    • April 2021 (4)
    • March 2021 (3)
    • February 2021 (6)
    • January 2021 (8)
    • December 2020 (4)
    • November 2020 (5)
    • October 2020 (7)
    • September 2020 (7)
    • August 2020 (10)
    • July 2020 (6)
    • June 2020 (9)
    • May 2020 (9)
    • April 2020 (5)
    • March 2020 (7)
    • February 2020 (3)
    • January 2020 (4)
    • December 2019 (4)
    • November 2019 (6)
    • October 2019 (3)
    • September 2019 (6)
    • August 2019 (3)
    • July 2019 (1)
    • June 2019 (3)
    • May 2019 (2)
    • April 2019 (2)
    • March 2019 (2)
    • February 2019 (4)
    • January 2019 (2)
    • December 2018 (2)
    • November 2018 (2)
    • October 2018 (2)
    • September 2018 (1)
    • August 2018 (2)
    • July 2018 (3)
    • June 2018 (1)
    • May 2018 (3)
    • April 2018 (1)
    • March 2018 (3)
    • February 2018 (3)
    • January 2018 (1)
    • December 2017 (3)
    • November 2017 (3)
    • October 2017 (3)
    • September 2017 (2)
    • August 2017 (2)
    • July 2017 (2)
    • June 2017 (2)
    • May 2017 (4)
    • April 2017 (3)
    • March 2017 (3)
    • February 2017 (5)
    • January 2017 (3)
    • December 2016 (2)
    • November 2016 (5)
    • October 2016 (4)
    • September 2016 (3)
    • August 2016 (5)
    • July 2016 (3)
    • June 2016 (4)
    • May 2016 (3)
    • April 2016 (6)
    • March 2016 (4)
    • February 2016 (3)
    • January 2016 (5)
    • December 2015 (6)
    • November 2015 (5)
    • October 2015 (8)
    • September 2015 (2)
    • August 2015 (5)
    • July 2015 (7)
    • June 2015 (4)
    • May 2015 (6)
    • April 2015 (5)
    • March 2015 (7)
    • February 2015 (15)
    • January 2015 (8)
    • December 2014 (5)
    • November 2014 (9)
    • October 2014 (7)
    • September 2014 (9)
    • August 2014 (5)
    • July 2014 (11)
    • June 2014 (5)
    • May 2014 (4)
    • April 2014 (5)
    • March 2014 (8)
    • February 2014 (8)
    • January 2014 (5)
    • December 2013 (7)
    • November 2013 (7)
    • October 2013 (14)
    • September 2013 (12)
    • August 2013 (15)
    • July 2013 (15)
    • June 2013 (15)
    • May 2013 (15)
    • April 2013 (15)
    • March 2013 (15)
    • February 2013 (15)
    • January 2013 (15)
    • December 2012 (15)
    • November 2012 (15)
    • October 2012 (15)
    • September 2012 (15)
    • August 2012 (15)
    • July 2012 (15)
    • June 2012 (15)
    • May 2012 (15)
    • April 2012 (15)
    • March 2012 (15)
    • February 2012 (15)
    • January 2012 (15)
    • December 2011 (15)
    • November 2011 (17)
    • October 2011 (17)
    • September 2011 (17)
    • August 2011 (21)
    • July 2011 (20)
    • June 2011 (17)
    • May 2011 (15)
    • April 2011 (17)
    • March 2011 (25)
    • February 2011 (20)
    • January 2011 (20)
    • December 2010 (18)
    • November 2010 (21)
    • October 2010 (21)
    • September 2010 (25)
    • August 2010 (20)
    • July 2010 (10)
    • June 2010 (11)
    • May 2010 (19)
    • April 2010 (16)
    • March 2010 (14)
    • February 2010 (22)
    • January 2010 (18)
    • December 2009 (20)
    • November 2009 (20)
    • October 2009 (3)
    • September 2009 (21)
    • August 2009 (19)
    • July 2009 (12)
    • June 2009 (12)
    • May 2009 (11)
    • April 2009 (15)
    • March 2009 (21)
    • February 2009 (4)
    • January 2009 (12)
    • December 2008 (13)
    • November 2008 (9)
    • October 2008 (22)
    • September 2008 (20)
    • August 2008 (16)
    • July 2008 (14)
    • June 2008 (7)
  • Blog Stats

    • 5,962,116 hits
  • Please give your feed back .

  • Click below to see who is watching this website live !

  • This site will never aim for profit. Still ,this donation link is added at the request of few visitors who wanted to contribute and of-course that will help make it sustainable . Donate Button with Credit Cards
  • Please Note

    The author acknowledges all the queries posted by the readers and wishes to answer them .Due to logistic reasons only few could be responded. Inconvenience caused is regretted.
  • Live 3D global traffic map Stats

WPThemes.


  • Follow Following
    • Dr.S.Venkatesan MD
    • Join 820 other followers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • Dr.S.Venkatesan MD
    • Customize
    • Follow Following
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Copy shortlink
    • Report this content
    • View post in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
 

Loading Comments...
 

    %d bloggers like this: