When half a dozen guidelines from extremely evidence based “Esteemed cardiac societies” decide to confront an Incomprehensive cardiologist , there is no other way , but to create a personalised i-Guidelines on STEMI !
*(i-Idiotic)
When half a dozen guidelines from extremely evidence based “Esteemed cardiac societies” decide to confront an Incomprehensive cardiologist , there is no other way , but to create a personalised i-Guidelines on STEMI !
*(i-Idiotic)
Posted in acute coronary syndrome, Cardiology -Interventional -PCI, Cardiology -Therapeutic dilemma, cardiology -Therapeutics, STEMI -Managment | Tagged acc esc aha guidelines scai on pci, culprit vs non culprit pci, decision cto, deferred pci, deferred ptca, delayed stemi, dilemma in stemi late presentation, how to manage 48 hour old stemi, ira pci, late presentation of stemi, late stemi, non culprit pci in stemi, Primary oci, stemi beyond 48 hours approach | Leave a Comment »
Yes, Medicine is a funny science ( some don’t agree , Isn’t Art ?) Many of the noble professionals are silently pursuing their job of saving lives and removing human suffering .Meanwhile, people like this author are needlessly bothered about some Imaginary Issues and write stuff like this one , . . that you are reading now !
Yes, there is an invisible tectonic shift taking place in the name of science.The way we practice medicine currently, it fits in with any of the following descriptions . Divine, Godly,dramatic,miraculous , comical ,cruel or even outright brutal ! (I dare not quantify the weightage of each adjectives used above !)
The field of cardiology as I know personally for the past three decades is challenged by uncontrolled growth (How about proposing 1000 dollar PCSK blocker Evolocumab for a meaningless reduction of few mg of LDL over and above Statin ) Further,the technology goes on to Implode at every corners of wall street ,(Mitra clip for mild MR of DCM ! TAVR for aged Aortic valve ) hijacking commonsense and cost (where is the effectiveness ?) of every stake holder .
In the process ,the critical healing power that resides within every biological system is ignored and ridiculed upon .(You become a fool if you say endothelial tissue plasminogen activator and lytic system will take care of a bulk of the intravascular vascular thrombus if we wait, and we shall permanently defer an Intervention! Current space aged physicians want to invade every existing (or non existing ) problem with multi pronged military strategy and guess what will happen to the humble body which becomes the battle ground.
Coming to the content proper
Sometimes I feel God throws some random truths at an unexpected time through some extraordinary men ! Here is a most unusual study of its kind from the Sanctum sanctorum of Medical science , namely Harvard medical school and Massachusetts General hospital .I think it was presented in ACC Scientific sessions 2018 , Orlando and published in Journal of American heart Association.
Cheers and congratulations to the lead author Dr.Anupam B Jena* , Physician and professor , Department of health care policy , and Health economist
* A video profile of author is in the reference
There is no surprise a paper with such a title had a huge media backlash. USA today reacts . . .
My observations and final message
The paper from MGH, Boston dwells a sensitive area ,of course it has come with a gross conclusion (However, I feel it has hit the bull’s eye.) Still, for the critics, I want to tell one thing , who can deny the fact ? the massive evidence base with 100s and thousands of research papers created by cardiology scientific Industry over the decades is largely a damn squib.
(The problem with acquiring this sort of ready to synthesise knowledge stuff is, It sits right inside our brain and bonds irreversibly , refuse to leave even if these dubious practices are proven dangerous ultimately !)
It might appear , the only option to tackle fake science would be through some dramatic ,less than ideal or mediocre research papers (Or even another fake!) As long as final outcome is good for the public don’t bother about methodology of such studies.(Does it sound in any way I am a supporter of Donald Trump ,! No I am not !)
Reference
Now have a look at this (a long post ) which I wrote some time back. Find out whether these scribblings of mine seem to have grown some scientific backing now .
A brief Info about the author of this unusual paper that has put the field of Interventional cardiology into tail spin and fluttering in cross winds !
Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged ethics in medicine | 2 Comments »
One car company recalls 100s of thousands of cars for faulty equipment issues in recent years . It goes on to add , beware , it’s potentially dangerous . . . please fix it and bring your car at the earliest !

Mean while , scientific medical literature is flooded with dangerous articles, papers and guidelines . . . and pose serious threat to your patients !
Please search for the junk knowledge and then go on to expose, erase and , . . . and throw it to dustbin ! After all , research is searching for truth , again and again !
Let us welcome a new era , where we shall get alerts about wrong knowledge withdrawals and reversal ! Let it challenge the self proclaimed sancto-scientific medical world and a new medical literature cleansing movement (MLCM) begin in every sub specialty.
One such paper from Yale is linked below .
Finally . . . the forbidden message !

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged venkat quotes | Leave a Comment »
Conquering left main disease is considered as crowning glory for the Interventional cardiologists. For over three decades , CABG has remained the undisputed modality which is being challenged today. Fortunately, the Incidence of true isolated left main disease is low .(If Medina bifurcation subset is excluded)

With growing expertise , advanced hardware and Imaging ( like a 360 degree OCT fly through view ) one can virtually sit inside the left main and complete a PCI .
Still , coronary care is much . . . much . . . more than a technology in transit !
Most importantly, these complex PCIs require rigorous maintenance protocol with meticulous platelet knockout drugs , patient compliance and the genetic fate of drug efficacy . (Clopidogrel has since entered the final laps of inefficiency while Ticagrelor has some more time I guess !)
What is the current thinking about unprotected left main PCI ? Let us know it from real life experts !
For those answered , yes to the above question please leave this page , as the following question might trouble you much !
While competent surgeons are waiting to tackle left main by surgical means ,there are many centers which are Inclined towards PCI though we lack long-term outcome (At least 10 years like CABG )
Why do you think this is happening ? Are you ready for another crooked poll ?!
What exactly is left main disease ?
Some of us also suffer from a knowledge gap and tend to think Bifurcation lesions and left main disease are two distinct entities .The fact of the matter is , significant subset of bifurcation lesions are Indeed either left main equivalents or true left mains ( Medina 1,1,1 would constitute > 50 % all bifurc lesions ) If you include Invisible left main lesions in Medina ( 0,1,1 or 0,0,1 ) detected by IVUS/OCT it might reach easily cross 90% (Scientific guess !) Does that mean we have to think CABG even for all complex bifurcation lesions ? and reserve left main disease for isolated discrete mid shaft or ostial left main ?
Final message
My observation (Sincere to my limited conscience !) at least in this part of the world is : Left main Interventions are “perceived as pride” and its more related to “show of expertise” and is little to do with patient outcome.Unfortunately , cardiologists should not be blamed for it in isolation as the studies they follow are conflicted.
Forget SYNTAX/PRECOMBAT trials, the two famous studies EXCEL (Favor PCI) and NOBLE were published in 2016 made our life tough .One suggested PCI is acceptable /on par with CABG, while the other one put CABG superior , ensuring clarity replaced with confusion ! When we have a dispute , logic would suggest we should fall back on the status quo ie “CABG is superior” unless proved convincingly. Many sections of cardiology society failed to appreciate this.
Post PCI thoughts
*It may not be that hard to do a complex PCI . But, it’s never easier to understand current cardiology literature that is supposed to raise our intellect , which has a direct relevance to patient welfare. Note, many crucial , high stake studies tend to play academic deceit games with linguistic and statistical hyperboles like Non Inferior , likely superiority , Never inferior , near equipoise , regression of hazards, virtual follow-up in real vs trial world etc , etc !
I can only hope for a better scientific world !
Reference
Posted in CABG Indications, cardiac surgery, Cardiology -Interventional -PCI, cardiology -Therapeutics, Cardiology -unresolved questions, cardiology wisdom, cath lab tips and tricks | Tagged best option for left main disease, left main disease, left main pci or cabg, precombat syntax nobel excel study | Leave a Comment »
Answer
Though PTMC in the presence of LA clot is an option in low risk clots , my strategy would be the last one ,whenever feasible. Intensive, monitored Heparin /Oral anticoagulants ( Heparin 5000 units tds or qid or Low molecular weight heparin Enoxaparin 40-60mg twice a day , Tablet Warfarin /Acitrom with an INR of 3 ) will dissolve LA clot in 30-50% of times.(Our experience).
The percutaneous clot retrieval system is not available as on 2018.Aortic filters are FDA approved during TAVR. (Why not use the same in PTMC ?) LA Catheter based regional lysis through PFO is can be an option if patient agrees to the risk.
How long to wait for clot dissolution with Heparin /OAC?
Most small clots or intermediate sized clots ((Up to 2 CM ?) have been dissolved by 3 months. Even large clots gets dissolved at least in few Instances.Please note, this strategy is applicable only with valves that is fit for PTMC. All others are referred for surgery.
How does heparin lyse a clot ?
Its a miracle to see it happen, though heparin / OAC are never considered as thrombolytic agents .It happens because both heparin and OAC tilts the local endogenous fibrinolytic forces and thrombus melts , dissolves or disappear altogether. (I am waiting for the day , the scientific community to re-label heparin as a thrombolytic agent, Indirectly though !)
Is there a risk of dislodgement of LA clot during heparin /OAC therapy ?
This question shall be addressed to God ! It all happens if bad luck strikes you and your patient.
Be wise . . . and call your surgeon Immediately when you encounter something like this !
Even if the valve is perfectly eligible for PTMC , high risk mobile clots, history of embolic episodes , probing and hyper-googling patients , its better to refer for surgery Immediately. Wait and watch game has a definite risk of stroke and it is especially bound to happen if your patient or their family is anxious !
Reference
Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a Comment »
Ventricular pressure volume loop is an Important concept (often fearsome !) to learn for cardiology fellows . . . I would say , It is not that hard to understand !
These loops tell us the secret hemodynamic story of heart. Made with 300 grams of mystery muscle, the heart handles about 100 ml of blood every beat, and successfully ejects around 70 ml into Aorta and Pulmonary artery * ·
’
While doing this life sustaining job , It would seem the heart muscle conducts a perfect, non stop, hemodynamic orchestra with 4 electro-mechanically coupled phases which is depicted as classical ventricular pressure volume loop. Mind you, this loop is plotted from pressure volume data from a single heart beat and it can’t be time correlated with heart sounds or ECG as the two parameters loop around in the same time cycle.
Watch this animation , carefully and read the appearing annotation that come along with each phase.That should suffice to understand the basic. (For Audio version go the video link in the reference )
*Note: When we say PV loop it means about by LV by default . We do have seperate RV ,LA (even RA?) PV loops.
Is there clinical application for PV loops ?
It may not have any direct use , but understanding how a ventricle works in normal conditions or at distress especially during acute decompensations or after surgery is vital. With modern gadgets like LV assist devices, Impella used widely and to assess hemodynamic efficiency of transplanted (Very soon total artificial hearts) , PV loop analysis of both RV/LV will be critical.
Is there any simple Lab modality that can draw this Loop curve instantaneously ?

Very few companies make it . AdInstruments that make power lab monitors, enable us to visualise PV loops invasively .
Can we get PV loops non invasively by Echocardiography ?
Echocardiography provide us both volume and pressure data.With improving accuracy of data it should be possible to plot the loop manually with some effort. (Still , we can’t get pressure in all points of cardiac cycle )
I guess, sooner 3D volumetric machines with automated online doppler pressure data across the valves can help us draw the ultimate LV functional curve live on real time.If that happens cardiologists will be further enriched and hemodynamically enlightened !
Final message
The shape , size , timing and the slopes of this loop givs us vital info about the functional aspects of ventricle. First one should understand the normal loop , then , we can dwell on the effects of acute and chronic lesions like regurgitations, cardiomyopathy ,cardiogenic shock etc.
An excellent knwoledge base on the topic with a video
Dr. Richard E. Klabunde, PhD
Posted in Cardiology - Animations, cardiology physiology | Tagged phases of cardiac cycle, physiology of heart contraction, pressure volume loop normal, wiggers cardiac cycle | Leave a Comment »
In the modern era of cardiology, PCI has become the single therapeutic modality that determines the survival of both cardiologists and possibly their patients! The procedure is all about launching a metal coil inside the coronary artery of a live beating heart.

Millions of diseased and (not much) diseased coronary arteries are serviced (either re/deconstructed ) world-wide on a day-to-day basis.The benefits of the modality is directly related to the wisdom of treating cardiologist and patient’s luck than the original severity of the disease. However, with greatly improved coronary metallurgy , well assisted by drug coating technology and antiplatelet Industry , cardiac physicians believe they have reached the zenith of this procedure.
But the truth is , PCI still has many lingering issues regarding safety , efficacy and cost effectiveness.Early hazard in the form of acute stent thrombosis and sudden death is a reality. Blaming it on patients and their lesions ( condition of blood , gene included) , metal behavior is easy , but, wrong selection (Ignoring the option of CABG) and technical inadequacy of the procedure in the setting of complex vessel wall disease (Hard calcium , deep tunnels , fissures , dead spaces ) is a major cause for concern.
Some personal thoughts about Post dilatation
Lesion preparation , pre/per-dilatation /POTS , etc by itself a big topic (which is not discussed here) Post dilatation after direct stenting is much more vital concept that determines not only the immediate but also the , Intermediate and long-term outcome.
Is routine post dilatation harmful ? or beneficial ?
This is the most tough question to answer . The answer is both Yes and No ! While it was thought useful and mandatory by some , the oppositeis also being adviced few (CCL 2003 POSTIT trial)
What balloon pressure one should post dilate ? At what compliance ? What is the Inflation time ?
It’s akin to asking a musician how to play a piano with fingers or guitar with various strings !

The effect of balloon pressures in the long term outcome. note both low and high pressure dilatation ( blue and orange worms ) hike the risk of restenosis. Too gentle is as dangerous as too harsh making post dilatation a secret and unique art.
Physics of post-dilatation . . . again more questions !
It’s very likely, the moment balloon encounters an area of resistance it tends to avoid that area and would love to drag on to the area of least resistance and this is often diagonally opposite zone of hard lesions ( if that segment is free from hardness).Then , it will face more stress and likely to bear the brunt of the force risking endothelial disruption . In other words , concentric hard lesions are more amenable for dilatation than patchy hard segments. While the physical forces vary in a stented vs non stented segment , the principle of dynamic forces on static tissue masses with Intervening metal is too complex. (Mind you , we are not discussing entirely different issue , ie thrombus laded ACS lesion , where displacement and pinching of of inter-strut thrombus into distal circualtion would cause no reflow!)
Impact of newer hardware
*Ablation catheters either rotational or Orbital can help , but must be done prior to stenting .Unfortunately , the hardness of a lesion is often realised only after stenting
Is selective high pressure inflations over a particular struts possible ?
As of now , it would be challenging ,( if not outright impossible) .
Let us realise with all our intellect, complex PCI as a whole is taking an uncalculated risk and leave the rest to GOD and DAPT !
Reference article
In an elegant study of more than 90000 PCIs from Sweden and Holland (Ref : Fröbert O, PLoS ONE. 2013 ) found routine post-dilatation pushes the harm curve little more than benefit. The was more with both low and very high pressures .
The outcome of post-dilatation in 900,00 PCIs

Estimated cumulative event rates of stent thrombosis (Panel A) Restenosis (Panel B ) Cumulative death (Panel C) in relation to post-dilatation .Note the height of coronary Irony, Post dilatation Increase stent thrombosis and restenosis but saves life too !
The stunning truth revealed in this study was , early deaths were more common if post dilatation was not done ! (Panel C in above figure)
Role of Imaging in the decision-making prior to Post dilatation
IVUS, OCT has been extensively used in recent times to diagnose suboptimal deployment and to asses lesion morphology.Though they are expected to improve the quality of angioplasty and hence the outcome , the real world scenario is not really confirming our expectations.
This is because , eagle-eyed HD imaging throws more questions than answers in many and it converts coronary artery into a confused Pandora’s box . In fact these Imaging modalities has created fresh confusions , definitions and guidelines for malapposition under and over expansion , strut fracture, plaque prolapse, internal elastic laminar stress.( Still , I am not able eo understand whats malapposition vs under deployed stent from a practical , pateint point of view !)
Is the Self expanding stent is the answer ?
The conundrum of post dilatation might be cracked if the built-in radial force of self expanding stents is optimally utilised .This could be useful in some tricky lesions when the vessel goes for progressive Glagovian remodeling post PCI. The self expanding stent because of the stored potential energy keep hugging the vessel wall as it expands centrifugally.
Final Message
Post dilatation is neither a mandatory nor a sacred protocol in cath lab. However , it would seem bulk of PCI’s still will require it . Its done judiciously with reference to clinical setting, (ACS vs CCS) , type and location of lesion , stent characteristics etc .Most Importantly , the experience of the cardiologists counts ,and he or she will decide when, where, how much of post dilatation is required (or not required) .
Please remember , PCI as a whole (more so the Pre/ Post dilatation !) is an art by itself. It’s never learnt in text books or even watching live work shops. Every young Cardiologists are enouraged to master the art of PCI , with a huge caveat . Always ensure patient’s Interest are placed first in every step forward. If you are not clear in comphrehending “What is meant by true patient’s Interest ? never Indulge in the procedure or call your mentor , if you have one !
Reference
1.Brodie BR1, Cooper C, Jones MCatheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2003 Jun;59(2):184-92. Is adjunctive balloon postdilatation necessary after coronary stent deployment? Final results from the POSTIT trial. Postdilatation Clinical Compartative Study (POSTIT) Investigators.
Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged post dilatation, pre vs postdilatation, ptca post dilatation | 1 Comment »
Bernoulli principle states that , when a high pressure jet (Air, Water, blood etc ) moves over a conduit, the pressure exerted by the jet on its sides (Lateral wall) reduces . The velocity gain is equal to pressure drop .This is why we take velocity as a rough guide to pressure gradient and the sacred formula in doppler echocardiography 4V2 came in to vogue . (Incidentally, Bernoulli principle shares the same principle when aircrafts lifts from runway at its peak speed as the pressure above the wings drops to zero or negative and the plane lifts up.)

Please note , the pressure should drop both above and below the aircraft by Bernoulli principle .But, the engine and wings are arranged in such a way , the air speed below the aircraft is slower and hence the pressure is high below and low above and the lift occurs promptly at take of velocity. Imagine , how the valve leaflets in heart is subjected to lift and drag forces every time the blood gushes with high velocity flows.This is also the reason for the Pulsus bisferiens, SAM in HOCM, Coanda effect in supra valvular stenosis, and any post stenotic dilatation.
In Echocardiography the Bernoulli equation is modified.

In clinical doppler echocardiography, we have liberally simplified the original Bernoulli equation by ignoring the the proximal sub valvular velocity V1 . Further , two more components in the equation is also amputated for our convenience ! (Flow acceleration and the viscous friction) .This is the reason we tend to err many times especially in outflow tract gradients and prosthetic valve gradients .
Pressure recovery phenomenon.
This is another hemodynamic lacunae in clinical echocardiography. We know, thepeak velocity of blood is attained just distal to site of obstruction. As the distal velocity beyond the obstruction begins to fall, the pressure tends to recover corresponding to the loss of velocity. This happens to certain distance beyond the obstruction. Since continuous wave doppler measures the pressure in its entire axis of alignment , it is likely to pick more pressure samples from the recovered areas and net result is, it measures more than the true difference in gradient across the valve.The phenomenon is most relevant in assessment of Aortic stenosis and results in over estimation of severity of stenosis.
Importance of Aortic root dimension
Pressure recovery is more likely to occur with small Aortic root. A stiff so be careful when interpreting echo gradients in small aorta. Relationship between size of aorta and pressure recovery is complex .(Niederberger of pressure recovery for the assessment of aortic stenosis by Doppler ultrasound. Role of aortic size, aortic valve area and direction of the stenotic jet in vitro. Circulation 1996; 94:1934–40)
How much can be the overestimation ?
It can be up to 30 % or even more.Especially in prosthetic Aortic valves.
How to recognise it and overcome it ?
Does this phenomenon happen with cath gradient ?(Generally it’s more pronounced in doppler echo )
Yes, It does happen in cath lab also , as its related to physics of flow. It can be minimised if we can use two simultaneous catheters ,one in LV and the other Aortic catheter placed very close to the leaflets.
Click below for an Animated version
Reference
Posted in Cardiology -unresolved questions, Cardiology-Echocardiography, Infrequently asked questions in cardiology (iFAQs) | Tagged bernoulli equation, doppler echocardiography, doppler principles, overestimation of doppler gradient by pressure recovery, pressure recovery phenomenon | 3 Comments »
Pre-op cardiac evaluation prior to non cardiac surgery is an important area for cardiology consultation . Unlike other clinical consults this one primarily involves in the delicate and tricky job of predicting future events !
Peri-operative cardiac evaluation is done for what ?
1.To evaluate and assess established CAD or other heart disease and get a proper pre-operative work up , drug adjustment and risk reduction for a possible peri-operative event.
2.To screen for any significant CAD or other heart diseases which is hiding and asymptomatic.
3.To treat those conditions that are detected prior to surgery .(Or simply assess & mark the risk and send them for surgery)
4.Finally and most importantly it is often done as a routine “legal point of view” or ” perceived anxiety “as litigation for missed cardiac condition looms large on the surgeon !
Risk stratifying established heart disease is relatively easy task as we know what we are talking about .The term “cardiac fitness” is used in some institution which should probably be discouraged .No patient’s cardiovascular system is deemed to be fit or unfit at any point of time.It all goes with the nature and aim of surgery .An apparently fit person can develop more complications than a potential unfit person as cardiac events are dynamic and directly influenced by the stress of surgery .
It’s about the probability of occurring possible events , and of course one should add to this , all those invincible random or remote events of Heisenberg .
How do you rule out CAD ?
A middle aged man or women with diabetes with a T wave inversion and non specific ST segment is being planned for ca-prostate or breast surgery .Both of them couldn’t do stress test due to associated OA knee.
If coronary atherosclerosis is defined as CAD , there is no way you can rule out CAD.In fact near 100% of elderly population will have evidence for CAD ( at least some degree) in the walls of the coronary .All that is required is just few minutes of heightened adrenergic drive or prolonged fall in blood pressure to trigger acute coronary syndrome in any person who may have shown even a normal coronary angiogram. How does it happen ? We have sufficient technological jargons to use in such situations endothelial dysfunction, plaque erosion erosion ,micro or macro vascular spasm coronary auto circulation failure etc ..
Is exercise stress test , Doubtamine stress , or CAG must for all persons suspected to harbor CAD ?
This could be the key question that makes most cardiologist tentative in their office .suspicion is relative and subjective term .So we have the guidelines .Guidelines are simply guidelines. It may give you comfort if you follow that either academically or legally .
Iam not convinced .Iam new gen cardiologist. Iam unable to rule out CAD without CAG , my cardiology training over a decade has never taught me to r/o CAD clinically
I will go ahead with a screening coronary angiogram in all persons in whom I suspect CAD strongly .If the patient is not willing for CAG I will do a doubtamine stress echo.
What if you detect a positive Doubtamine test or a significant multi-vessel CAD in an other asymptomatic person ?
Now you are stuck again !
How guilty are we ? If we fail to predict a cardiac event during non cardiac surgery ?
We need not feel guilty at all as long as you have done the basic tests and given your learnt opinion.I would think no court of law can plead guilty for that. (But your local reputation may be at stake !)
Final message
It is very important to realise , pre-op screening should not be a “hunting ground for CAD”.What we refer to as cardiac fitness is actually is a logical guess considering all risk factors and comorbid conditions and make a learnt decision depending upon the aim of surgery and the urgency of surgery .(Read at least once the meticulously prepared ACC guidelines of 2014)
Forbidden thoughts
In real world , it appears the task of risk stratification and pre-op evaluation is mainly driven by the fear of litigation rather than true concern about the impact of surgery on the ultimate outcome.In this gentle world of noble professionals one can’t question the true Indication of a surgery however dubious it may appear as it considered serious violation of Hippocrates oath* (Not respecting or suspecting your colleagues’s credentials !) But , I earnestly believe a genuine review of decision about surgery or procedure is to me made.
In my humble opinion , if surgery can be postponed or( if could be altogether avoided in few !) till complete cardiac stability is achieved is the most desirable option in high risk patients .
* Am I misquoting Hippocrates ?
Consider this true story . Recently a elderly women came for cardiac clearance for laproscopic Cholecystectomy . As I was doing echocardiogram the patient asked me with real concern , “Is the surgery really necessary doctor ? my doctor says its urgent “ . I casually told her since its a incidentally detected small gall stone , if its not troubling you surgery may be not be urgent , rather may be avoided. Few days went past. I don’t know whatever happened to that women , she opted out of the scheduled surgery .
Next week, , there was huge uproar from the surgeon , who called my associate and censured my behavior.He went on to add , as a cardiologist I have no business to comment about the gall bladder condition. Even if what I uttered could be truth , as a doctor you don’t have a right to breach other doctors opinion.
After few days of self deliberation , I agreed with him and realised in harsh way , freedom of expression can never be taken as granted especially in dealing with others patients !
My colleagues ridiculed my Ignorance , aren’t you aware every patient is a registered property of some doctor ? An Anesthetist friend of mine working in a corporate hospital, said If I start scrutinising the indication of surgeries I assist, I cant win my bread for my family beyond few days !
I simply couldn’t comprehend .” A patient is a patient “ What is the demarcation between my and your patient. She asked me a question I answered it to my conscience , that’s it. Should I behave like a deaf mute ?after 30 years in to medical practice !
I was still restless over the week .Finally, I decided to get the answer from Horse’s mouth and mailed the query direct to father of medicine,
To query@hippocrates.heaven
Dear Mr Hippocrates ,
Here is a story of “Fit gall bladder and an unfit surgeon” . Did I really err on that day or was my behavior unprofessional in any way as others thought ?
Yours greatly
S.Venkatesan.Physician,Chennai .India
I got a surprisingly shocking reply ,
From query@hippocrates.heaven to drvenkatesans@yahoo.co.in
Dear Dr.Venkatesan
I could feel your inner fight about the things happen in medical profession . However genuine your thoughts are, I am sorry , I say this with pain , you are largely unfit to practice medicine in the planet earth. Please try to change yourself or try changing the planet !
Learn to take things easy in life !
With regards.
Hippocrates. (Digitally signed )
Posted in perioperative risk assessment: Non cardiac surgery, Preoperative evaluation | Tagged acc aha guidelines peri operative pre operative risk fitness, cardiac fitness prior to surgery, peri operative cardiac risk assesment, preop cardiac evaluation | 4 Comments »
We know, The Mysterious Alibaba cave opens with a voice password . . . legend tell us it had unlimited hidden treasures. It would appear , CTOs mimic the cave in several ways. What is inside ? Should we open it ? Can we come out safely ? Do we have any magical password in cath lab to get across the complex tissue boulders ?, every cardiologist would love to have one !

Dear CTO,Open Sesame . . . I have come with all the wires you love ! Please let me in !
Indication
“CTOs are never an emergency . . .but please realise we can very easily create one while resuscitating a dead snake !
Don’t think hard on evidence , then , you may not do a single case of CTO in your life .Forget all those pessimistic trials like OAT,COAT, etc and the recent ones DECISION-CTO. Ignore all guidelines. Ask your patient, and his insurance company , if they are willing , reserve the cath lab and get ready.
Pre-procedure planning
Spend at least a hour to analyse the CTO Imagery one day prior and create n action plan.
Keep knowledgeable staff for assisting , but never ask for fellow colleagues help because it hurts our ego ! Cardiac surgeon’s back up is a welcome addition even if it’s on paper.
If possible , try to ask the patient genuinely ,what is his symptom at least once ! before starting the procedure.
Timing of the procedure.
Don’t post a CTO patient either on a busy Monday morning or lazy Friday afternoon.
Hardware Inventory
The wires ,catheters, the balloons form the essential tool box .There is more than a handful of coronary automobile companies manufacture this .It is all about metallurgy , knowledge of wires, catheters , and tip thickness, (Bullet shaped as in Asahi ) , slipping , hydrophophic or philic, polymer coating , trackability, pushability , memory etc etc.
Guide wire tip morphology is as Important as the Lesion characteristics !
Analysis of the lesion (Probably most important)
Unlike conventional PCI we have no initial target.We need to poke first and find the target next ! Distal vessel status is most important ( Careful review of retrograde filling through collaterals could give more information than CT angiograms .Calcification, diffuse disease can be a real hurdle)
Lesion morphology
Softness of lesion has to be felt (Requires good wire which has sensor (Paccinian corpuscles and Merckle disc ideal ?) I guess the cortical tactile feel is as vital as the intervention expertise .I know at least one diabetic colleague of mine who finds it difficult to cross a CTO and admits he never found it easy to feel the lesion through the wires . Autonomic dysfunction ?)
Operator expertise
(Note: These are like reading swimming guidelines , you can’t learn in the shores reading books ! you have to plunge !)
Many techniques are proposed .Sequential approach (Ironically experts are licensed to use specialized wired wires directly .Beginners are advised to go with non specialized hardware and escalate step by step) Some centers are blessed with new age weapons like cross Boss and sting ray that confront the lesions in multiple frontiers. (Carpet bombing?)

CTO playground. : Its essentially a coronary contact sport with expert septal surfing , tunnelling, knuckling , kneeling , bending . Of course , It can end up in a gratifying win in few , still most of us tend to play this game without a goal (post !) Source of the Image : Unknown Due credits to the creator.
They are basically about poking the head of the lesion and trying to cross an occluded vessel millimeter by mm towards the presumed distal vessel in an Imaginary trajectory. Proximal cap, central core ,the blind tunnel , distal capsule and exit points each must be successfully conquered.
CTO crossing is the ultimate capacity of the operator to realise and feel the position of the wires in true lumen and their confidence levels in their conviction!
Multiple wires up to three are used some times to poke the lesion two of them are used to shut the false tracks and the other one is expected to enter the true lumen (Looks too good on theory !) . These are referred to in as many terms like parallel wire see-saw , CART ,Reverse CART etc .Retrograde techniques do help us but has no magic solutions.The lumen contrast , guide wire tip movement and its side branch entry would help.
Tacking complication :Always anticipate , it’s not negative mind set to look for it !
Keep pericardiocentesis kit , covered stents , micro snares and other retrieval devices ready in cart. Your support staff should be well versed with what is happening around them. Some of the dye leaks and stains are safe .They imply minor perforations that form sealed hematomas (The plane of perforations also matters. myocardial (ab-pericardial ) leaks are well tolerated .Distal perforations are also safe as long as CTO is not opened ) Online echocardiography should be readily available to monitor pericardial space leak.
When bleed into pericardial space is life threatening , A comical, but life saving option is to close the artery and restore the CTO its original state and come out of the lab quietly !
Newer Imaging guidance : Can be useful , still may not matter much when considering the interventional acumen .
CTO PCI : Time as therapeutic end point.
CTO is not an endless game with out time frame .In my opinion it shouldn’t cross 45 minutes each as in a soccer game with a brief strategic time out and of course with liberal use of ,yellow and red cards
Future directions
Japanese are the ones who pioneered CTO Interventions . We expect more Innovations ! Is it the forward looking IVUS ? It is akin to tunneling for underground metro train with GPS guiding .If you can mark the proximal and distal points , rest will be be taken care by mortised self tunneling catheters from Robotic arms steered by sophisticated algorithms.
Final message
CTO PCI remains a real Interventional challenge. We are often double blinded in both directions (antegrade as well as retrograde ). Needs much effort ,time, hardware and most importantly a non fatigued mind and body. The benefits we get may vary between gratifying to outright mediocre .Of course , it surely satisfies operator ego and express pride and courage !
Is crossing and stenting a CTO synonymous with true success ?
Yes it is , for the cardiologist and the hospital . . . I’m not sure about it for the patient !
In this sense , CTOs mimic the mysterious Alibaba cave that tempts us with Imaginary treasures but can trap us with a wrong password !
Post-Ample
* Who should CTO PCI ?
I have seen young , enthusiastic cardiologists with Immature support staff attempting CTO in remote sub- urban settings ! Though patience and expertise are essential ingredients, some amount of organised training and hardwares make CTO PCI safe and effective. Enthusiasm and affordability alone can’t be an Indication for this complex set of coronary lesions.
Reference
I still wonder why this vital paper was never published , it was just presented in the Annual ACC conference March 2017
Posted in cardiology -Therapeutics, Cath lab Hardware, cath lab tips and tricks, cto chronic total occlusion | Tagged absolute refractory period, Best guideline on cto pci, cart reverse cart, chronic total occlsuion, cross boss sting ray, cto club, CTO club euro, cto euro club, cto japan club, cto mmc chennai madras medical college, decision cto trial drsvenkatesan, dr s venkatesan, ethical guidelines in cardiology, ethical issues in cto, management strategies in chronic total occlusion, see saw technique, tips and tricks for cto opening | Leave a Comment »