Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for the ‘Cardiology -unresolved questions’ Category

Many modern  day cardiologists  consider  doing echo ,  a mean job and leave it to  technicians and fellows . Final report  often ends up with a cursory glance. The culture of reporting an  important aspect of LV  function is reaching a new low. It is common  to find the following terminologies  in  the  echo reports in many  parts of the country*     (Guess it is not used elsewhere ! )

  • LV function good
  • LV function adequate
  • Good bi-ventricular  function
  • LV function fair

what is adequate LV function

Among these , the term adequate LV function has caught  the  imagination  of young cardiologists ! Especially , this description  often appear in pre- operative  screening echo for non cardiac surgeries .

Recently ,one of my patient asked me what do we mean by adequate  LV function . I told  him it means nothing . . . it’s all  fancy words  !  but , generally  it is used to imply  normal LV function . . . I  clarified .

Think over for few minutes   . . . what do we  want to convey  by calling LV function  as adequate ?

Does it mean normal ?  or  Just less than normal  ?

If adequate LV function  is accepted ,  what is inadequate ?

Adequate for whom ?  For the patient ?  or  for the physician ?

Adequate  for daily activity  ?  or  Adequate to  with-stand  the proposed  surgery ?

Final message

Even  learned cardiologists indulge in this  term  frequently . This is  rather a fancy and unprofessional  way reporting LV function . They pass this  style to their residents  as well para medics .Adjectives  in medical science are not banished . . . but should be   judiciously used . In my opinion  the term adequate LV function should be removed from all echo labs .   Youngsters please  watch out.

Related links in this site .

LV ejection fraction fallacies

What is LV dysfunction ?

Read Full Post »

Normal  left atrial  (LA) volume is about  22ml/sq.meter body surfacearea  at all ages.Maximum LA volume in physiology is  about 46ml in  females and 56 ml  in males( Average 35 ml)

LV stroke  volume  for each beat is  about  70  ml . . . so where does  the remaining 35ml come from ?

Answer .

  • Pulmonary veins ?
  • Residual LV end systolic volume ?
  • Mix of the two ?

It is logical to assume about 35 ml of fresh  blood  from 4 pulmonary vein*  rushes into LV with every diastolic cycle  .It  never stays in LA  .It just uses LA as a transit  route ,

*In diastole the four PVs,LA  and LV all act like one single chamber .

 

Is this reasoning correct ?.

If we believe the continuity equation this explanation is correct . However still what  we need to know the fate of residual  LV volume (End systolic LV  volume which is also  about 35 ml that would be  in queue for ejection into Aorta  for the next beat !)

Further , we know the LV end systolic volume is not constant .During exertion it  can reach  negligible levels (<10 ml) .At times of vigorous contractions  it can touch near zero as well . Then , It become vital for the  pulmonary venous reservoir  to be act as a  major donor for  LV blood volume for  every ensuing beat.

If the hemodynamics of pulmonary vein LA interface is tricky even in physiology ,  one can imagine the complexities  if the LV diastolic function and left atrial compliance  is affected

Debit and credits of  LV end -diastolic volume .

Let us assume LVEDV is about  1o5  ml .LA blood volume is  roughly one third of LV volume .For every beat equal amounts of fresh blood  from pulmonary vein . These two (LA+PV)  adds to the  residual  blood in LV  to make LVEDV 105   ml . From this 70 ml is ejected as stroke volume leaving behind 35 ml.


lvedv lvesv stroke volume wiggers cycle left atrial volume pressure volume loop residual diastasis

Image template from http://www.cvphysiology.com

 Further questions

LA Chamber volume and blood volume need not be same .What  I struggle to understand is , total anatomical  LA volume  measures  35ml , while the amount of blood it is supposed to hold is also about the same .Does  it mean the LA is completely filled with blood . . . air tight !

Will the LA compliance make it accommodate twice or thrice the blood volume during exercise ?

What is quantum of residual end diastolic  LA volume ?

 

Reference.(Normal LV and LA volumes )

echopedia

 

 

 

Read Full Post »

Cardiologists are  not  single organ  specialists . They are supposed to  be sincere guardians of the  the entire vascular system .Sexual dysfunction in  males  is almost synonymous with erectile dysfunction(ED) .The male sex organ is equally  dynamic organ like the heart . It demands a sudden gush of blood  to the tune of  500 ml  during complete  erection  .This  conveys an important  message . The penile macro and micro vasculature is as important  as coronary mIcrovascular bed. Atherosclerois of  LAD  can be as common as atherosclerosis  of pudendal artery .It can precede or follow the coronary lesion. Penile insufficiency is a early marker of endothelial dysfunction. All patients with CAD should be screened for  ED and vice versa.

This  is not a  sexual  intrusion in academics , but I am sure , a sustained  erection  that  completes  a normal sexual act  may very well  rule out a proximal LAD lesion 99 % of times .

Do you know , > 7  Mets  on a tread mill  will  rule out a  significant left main disease with high degree of accuracy   !  Sexual acts require more than that (One may do a study on this !)

There has been  some interesting guidelines for managing   issue of sexual dysfunction in CAD. .Princeton consensus conference is  the famous one.

References

princeton consensus conference sexual dysfunction in cardiology princeton 3 sexual dysfunction in cardiology

sexual activity in cardiovascular disease  circulation 2012

Read Full Post »

While many of us are preoccupied with wires and balloons ,( coronary  myopia ! )  , our radiology  colleagues are making rapid strides . Let us spend some  time  to understand  how  the myocardial segments  are inflicted the  final insult . We need to realize , there is a pattern  to  this myocardial  end game of scarring and fibrosis.

MRI is the  gold standard to assess the myocardial architecture . It has a role in both assessing the anatomy , function  , perfusion and viability .

how to differentiate ischemic dcm from idiopathic dcm myocardial scar epicardial transmural

  • LV function is assessed  by cine MRI
  • Viability  stud by  delayed enhancement MRI (DEMRI , also called as  LGE- Late Gadolinum enhancement  )
  • Myocardial scar best assessed by DEMRI*
* Why do you require DEMRI to identify scar ?
One can detect scars in plain MRI but contrasts make it better .Hence delayed enhancement in by DEMRI is used  to detect scars.
Is it ischemic  DCM or Non ischemic DCM ?  ( That is the question we commonly ask  
We rely too much on CAG anatomy for this. It can be misleading. Cine MRI with DEMRI  gives the answer straightway with high degree of accuracy  .  CAG is required in all  ,  but if it is normal , or  has insignificant lesions  , the dilemma  of ischemic DCM would continue !)
**Note ,there is one   simple algorithm proposed by the author   to  differentiate  Ischemic DCM from Idiopathic DCM  without MRI – Click here to  Link
Following  scar patterns in DEMRI help us to arrive a diagnosis.
Favors Non ischemic  DCM
  • Mid myocardial scar
  • Epicardial scars
  • Global sub-endocardial scars
  • No scar(Ironically if  no delayed  hyper-enhancement is noted it is likely to be non Ischemic DCM )
Favors ischemic DCM
  1. Regional transmural scars
  2. Localised sub-endocardial  scars
* Ischemic DCM will always involve subendocardium as ischemic wave front goes from sub-endo to epicardium.
examples for Non Ischemic DCM
  • Amyloidosis (Can be restrictive as well )
  • Chagas
  • Fabrys

Why is  scar localisation and Quantification important ?

Apart from differentiating various cardiomyopathies  it has  few clinical implication .

  • Since scar indicates irreversible damage , if extensive  it will  argue  against any re-vascularisation .
  • Scar location becomes vital if we plan CRT .It will be futile  to place a CRT lead over a scar.
  • Scars are often  form a macro re-entrant circuits for VT .Help us localize or zeroing in VT focus.
  • Scar quantification is helpful risk stratification of patients  with HOCM .and their family.
Final message
Myocardial scar location and quantification  is the new mantra in a  patient with dilated heart with cardiac failure.
It may be more important than even a coronary angiogram .MRI  will prevail over   any of the available echocardiogram modalities to assess the scar pattern.
Reference
myocardial scarring mri

Read Full Post »

Syncope in CHB is due to unsafe escape rhythm, changing focus of VPDs,  extreme bradycardia, (<20 /minute),  pause induced VT, (Usually polymorphic and torsades is quite common .)  ultimately may end with convulsions,  ventricular fibrillation, and death.

Syncope in SND is due to extreme slowing of SA node . Sinus pauses or even arrest can happen resulting in ventricular standstill. Fortunately, a stable escape rhythm ensues more often than in CHB. (It may just be around 20 or 30/mt. still, ventricular arrhythmias are uncommon. ) This implies an important fact that stability is more important than slowness.Fatality is rare in SND.However, the mechanism of syncope in  SND is influenced by the integrity of AV conduction also. If it is severely impaired it can trigger ventricular arrhythmias as well as the escape focus becomes unstable infra hisian location.

Paradoxically, in patients with SND, an episode of palpitation due to AF  or sinus tachycardia precedes the episode of syncope. An intelligent patient may recognize this as a warning and can take lying posture after runs of palpitation.This is because of tachycardia-induced suppression of  SA node prolong the sinus node recovery time still further.

How to differentiate cardiac syncope from simple vasovagal syncope?

Cardiac syncope  is differentiated by common vaso-vagal syncope (VVS) as the latter occurs during erect posture . It may be entirely due to vascular component and hence it may simply represent hypotension without a true cardiac limb .(Vasodepressor syncope)

Hence the pulse rate and volume may take some time to recover in VVS, while Stokes  Admas of CHB  usually have a well-formed bounding pulse in the recovery phase, as the rate is low and systemic hypoxia is a consistent feature.

How is the respiration during Stokes – Adams syndrome ?

Intact. Oxygenation in the lungs goes on for time being. The pooled pulmonary blood gushes after the termination of syncope and causes  the classical flushing. Since the hypoxia causes systemic vasodilatation the flushing is more obvious.(Unlike vasovagal syncope where they are often pale)

History of stokes Adam’s syndrome Morgagni is the  one who gave credit to their  discovery

Though Morgagni first described the clinical picture of this syndrome in 1761,  It was published much later by Two Irish Physicians  Stokes, Adams. Wish this entity is referred to as Morgagni-Stokes-Adam’s syndrome

Reference

1.R. Adams. Cases of Diseases of the Heart, Accompanied with Pathological Observations. Dublin Hospital Reports, 1827, 4: 353–453.

2.W. Stokes. Observations on some cases of  permanently slow pulse. Dublin Quarterly Journal of Medical Science, 1846, 2: 73–85

Read Full Post »

Time is muscle. This quote  became  sort of ” cardiology sermon”  in the last  few decades .Cardiologist think  they stand  on a 100 meters sprint track once a patient with STEMI arrives .This is indeed true ,  if we  agree  time is  muscle and  our urge is to reduce the door to balloon time .Please  remember ,  this rush matters  much ,  only if the patient comes through very early  when the muscle is really getting damaged . (No issues  . . . even if the fire engine comes in  slow motion if the  house is burnt fully !)

Time is muscle agreed  . . .  but  muscles are  kept alive by  factors other than time  !  So muscles can  defy time if God  is willing !

Time is one of the important components of management of STEMI.  Other things matter too !  Age , baseline co-morbidity ,  underlying extent of CAD, collateral support of IRA territory , and finally  individual variation in hypoxic damage in myocyte is (Rarely  been studied in detail.)

Door  to balloon time for a patient  who lands up within  1 hour window need  to be  much  different from a patient who comes at 10 th hour .The issue is important  because  we use a procedure which requires delicate decision-making ,(IRA-Non IRA issues etc)  the results can be  sub optimal ,  and even be hazardous in low risk STEMI . So , door to balloon time  may be a less  important  component of  time window in a patient who comes after 6 hours .This is the reason  overall outcomes are not changing in a large cohort  of rapidly performed PCI.

The presumed  absolute  relationship  between  “Time  and  muscle”  concept is  always been a suspect . This  is proven by a flawless study from  NEJM .

nejm stemi most important article

http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa1208200

This study should infuse more sense to  us ,  time and again, we are  hijacked and sedated by high dose of  pseudo scientific concoction .In fact ,  indiscriminate rapid PCI may not be in  the good interest of  all  patients with STEMI ,  if it is not properly done  .Without realising this fact many developing countries are indulging in extravagance of  costly STEMI programs wasting  the exchequer.

This landmark NEJM  paper convincingly underscores a fact  that  achieving  rapid door to balloon time  is not  going to be the game changer in  conquering  the Global   STEMI  championship  . We have to take the coronary care into the streets  or to their homes as well .This is where the pre-hospital thrombolysis will  emerge in a big way in the future .

A slow and steady thrombolysis beats a fast and furious primary PCI on any given day in all uncomplicated STEMI .This we have proven for over three decades in  one of the India’s largest coronary care unit .( Where is the data man ?  Genuine experience is data . Why  we require , the act of publication to convert an experience into evidence . Often times ,  I  would feel , data is the most unscientific word in medicine . Many Truths  lack evidence , false hoods come with plenty !  For all those  scientific  homo sapiens  , please recall  70 % of ACC/AHA class 1 recommendations are backed by level C evidence ie simple opinion from  perceived experts! )

Final message

A fast and furious primary PCI may not be  the answer in all STEMI population

Thrombolysis  can be  done  with near  zero time delay , it does not require special expertise where an ambulance driver can reperfuse   a myocardium without much fuss and glamor ! He does not have to  split his hair to identify which is the IRA in a complex multivessel STEMI as well ! The streptokinase and TPA will home in  to the target site  smoothly and swiftly .

If indeed ,  time is the major factor in STEMI , we have many other ways to tame  the time . If muscle is more important than time ,  pPCI is  rarely  the answer !

Some India specific  thoughts

Is it not a shame  , we talk about primary PCI  for all  our patients  who do not even get timely Aspirin* after a STEMI! .It is something akin to what we witness every day ,  as our country folks  wield touch screen  Androids  . . . conversing  in open air toilets !

* While the importance of  Aspirin is undermined , It is different story altogether , these patients  get sorbitarate promptly whenever they get chest pain  (mis-placed and  dangerous priority ! )  prescribed by the  roaring  GPs ,  who suffer from discontinuous medical education ,  propelled  by the deeply penetrated 1000 crore oral Nitrate market .

And STEMI workshops are conducted by self-proclaimed experts  every few months in posh  7 star hotels all over India .

Read Full Post »

Anterior mitral leaflet  has a classical M  shaped motion. Infrequently , M mode echo will record a triphasic pattern .

Triphasic AML motion

The exact  answer is not known . I guess it is a normal variant.

Often  it is recorded  when there is a long  and redundant AML , especially if the M-mode cut is too close to  the tips.

Though it is not common , I have seen in few the triphasic gets converted into classical M shaped pattern if the cursor is moved slightly away from the tip of AML.

Relationship to Heart rate

Some times it appears in slow heart rate and tends to disappear with tachycardia .

Triphasic Doppler filling vs Triphasic M-Mode

We do not know yet ,  how  the  triphasic AML motion  correlate  with triphasic Doppler filling pattern which  is considered a fairly good evidence for  LV dysfunction.

Read Full Post »

Scientific studies can be fun .In our spare time we often Indulge in rapid  fire sessions. We tested 30  wide qrs ECGs from our archives  (All proven VTs)  and  asked  our  cardiology fellows to apply Brugada criteria . They could   correctly  diagnose  VT  in 18* patients.The same ECGs were shown to the staff nurses of coronary care unit . 24  VTs were correctly identified  it.They did it by  their clinical sense and Instinct. (*12 vs 6  VTs missed)

wide qrs tachycardia svt with aberrancy and vt brugada verecki  griffith002

And now , four  clinical data was  provided. (Age , sex , Blood pressure , and  past H/o  MI were given )   The Nurses were able to predict it  28/30  VTs correctly.(97 % accuracy ) and the cardiologists  were able to equal the score now. So obviously clinical sense  was far superior .

Cardiology fellows were more likely to  mistake VT as SVT. This is far more common than SVT mistaken as VT. It is a strange academic  irony ,even the junior most nurses never missed a VT !

Summary

Simple sequence of history and clinical presentation is still far more powerful than ECG data in predicting wide qrs  arrhythmias . Nurses guess work is far superior than cardiologists  in predicting a wide QRS tachycardia as VT.

In fact , the  cardiology fellows are  preconditioned to   get confused   whenever they get a wide qrs tachycardia . Why  not aberrancy ?  In my  experience I have seen this question keeps  erupting inappropriately .Even  shrewd fellows suffer  from an  oscillatory  mind between VT and SVT .This is primarily because , every wide qrs ECG  is likely to  have at least two  criteria that fulfill both VT and SVT.

The implications are  genuine  and far reaching . While nurses  show a patient centric thinking  cardiology fellows  thought process revolves around ECG . Many modern-day cardiac physicians  are disconnected from clinical reality  and are obsessed with  complex EP concepts  and end up with a miserable face in the bed side !

This is not a new  revelation in 2013 . Masood Akthar told this  three decades ago.

Caution
Never try to glorify  guess-work . EP is a great science .The  pioneering concepts have made us understand how a VT emanates, travels , and exit from myocardium . We are able to localise it and ablate it .All credit goes to science . But , when it comes to bedside recognition of VT ,  clinical  sense  is a clear winner .With a  consistently > 90 % predictive value   it  can no longer be called as  a  guesswork   and becomes a hard scientific fact. Especially so , when the  intellectual  analysis of surface ECG   could predict  it  with paltry 70 %  accuracy (Read Reference 1)
Reference
This  analysis startlingly reveal  a fact .The over all accuracy  rate of predicting the wide qrs criteria  by  popular algorithms  is   between 66-77% ,  just 16 numerals   more than  gross   guess work  of 50 : 50 ( This  . . . or  . . . that )
Link to  Masood Akthar article

Read Full Post »

I’m trying to get  a right  answer for this question for quiet some time. The literature on lipids is so vast  , one can never finish reviewing it.There are   nearly two dozen journals that  deal with lipids ,Atherosclerosis, obesity ,and vascular biology .

Yet  , the answer to this simple question is elusive to us .The Irony is complete when we have evidence for   two diagonally  opposite responses 4 and 5 .

My interpretation of the issue

Any lipid molecule if exceeds a critical  level ( Only  if   . . . associated with hypertension, or diabetes or smoking ) can penetrate the vascular endothelium. ( HT-pressure injury , Smoke- Endothelial dysfunction  due to Nitric oxide depletion) DM -Glycation of cell membrane  , finally some  unknown inflammatory component )

Though evidence  for direct endothelial  injury is more for LDL ,  less for TGL (Almost nil  for VLDL , but  TGL has more VLDL in it !)

Strangely ,these molecules , express a mob psychological behavior .In isolation they appear innocuous. But ,in an  unfavorable   setting it shows signs of  revolt. If a group of  LDL molecule start attacking a  dysfunctional segment  of endothelium , the other molecules  like TGL and VLDL fractions would love to join the crowd  and inflict further  damage . (Of course ,the lonely HDL may watch the chaos silently !)

Questions to ponder

If LDL is a sharp knife like molecule  trying to injure the blood vessel , every normal human being is potentially threatened  by this  lipid fraction . Mind you,  this is a physiological molecule  traversing the human vascular system  at concentration  of 130mg/dl  at the  velocity of blood .

So it is  foolish  to blame this  physiological molecule for all our ignorance.

I recall one recent definition for hyperlipidemia

The lipid levels at which a patient develops vascular injury is considered high for him !

Read Full Post »

We do know about left main equivalent . Do we have a proximal LAD  equivalent ?

Proximal LAD lesions deserve a special attention and probably urgent intervention. Medical management is not an option in most  patients. (Proximal alone is not suffice , it should be critical as well )

But we have another issue on hand .What really is proximal LAD ? .

  1. First 5 Cm of LAD ? (LAD normally measure about  15cm so 1/3rd becomes proximal .How logical it looks  isn’t ?  )
  2. Before any  S1 or D1 ?
  3. Before any major S1 or D1 ?
  4. Septal branch is not considered at all  . A lesion is said to be proximal if it is before a major D1
  5. Some others may argue if there are  three major branch  distal to lesion it should be considered proximal.

Proximal LAD equivalents .

LAD first or second   bifurcation  lesions ( Medina1 1 1 , 1 1 0 , 1 0 1)

Mid LAD lesion with major D1 ostial  lesions

For  a super-dominant LAD  even  mid segment  lesion  can  be a   proximal equivalent (By area at jeopardy )

If LAD is giving collaterals  to LCX /OM  /  due to  associated  lesions ,   LAD lesion at any level  becomes  a left main equivalent .

Read the related article in this site

Read Full Post »

« Newer Posts - Older Posts »