Archive for the ‘echocardiography’ Category

Hey , What’s that moving object over  AML ?  It looks odd,  it doesn’t look like a thrombus or a vegetation.

Yes, I agree , its moving  independently  but  I think , Its benign threads of fibrin attached to the valve .They are called as valvular strands.

Is it ?, I haven’t heard about it !  Can you please  tell me something about it.

Strands are  highly mobile, fine, filiform  threadlike excrescences that is seen arising from valvular structures. Synonym : Its same as Lambl’s excresceneces , the Czech physician who described  it over Aortic valve in 1860.

The following TEE clip shows strands attached to Aortic valve


Reported Incidence of valvular strands  varies .Some reports suggested it may be up to 5-10 % .( SPARC study Mayo clinic 1999 its staggering 46 % !)The reason for  such high incidence  is,   many of us are still not clear what we refer to as strand.The imaging modality also has a say. With improving resolution of TTE and liberal TEE use more  strands are detected .A recent large study from Israel , suggest a good news , in large population based study (21,000) true strands are  observed in  just around  1 %.(Marina Leitman 2014 )

Is it Physiological or Pathological ?

The valve closure lines are physiologically stressed , some amount of denudation of endothelium is expected .This leads to a thrombus formation along with the exposed mucopolysacchride  layers of the valve form a filiform ,filamentous structure. .To call it physiological or pathological is left to our wisdom and  perception. The size however matters. It could be  the reason behind many  unexplained strokes.

What is the natural history of these strands ?

Its difficult to believe It may persist for lifetime.If its truely fibrinous strands it may have a life cycle and disappear.


Should be less than 1 mm.

Length varies between  3 mm to 5 mm


Can be seen in any valve or even in aortic root.

Attachment : Atrial side of mitral valve and ventricular side of Aortic valve.

Strands over prosthetic valve is also reported.

Clinical significance 

It has three common issues.

One: Getting confused with other more pathological entities.

Two : Risk of stroke.

Three: Nidus for normal native valve endocarditis ?

Strands may closely mimic 

  • Vegetations
  • Bland thrombus
  • Redundant leaflet /Chrodae (Marfan and variants)
  • Disrupted chordae (After MVR)
  • Flail leaflet
  • Fibroelastomas

Risk of dislodgement and  stroke 

These strands are minute. It seems plausible dislodgement need not necessarily result in stroke or other organ ischemia.We don’t know whether it gets dissolved on transit.However the risk of stroke is increased in most reports except few studies(Roldan).


First question to ask is , Should we inform our patients about  these ubiquitous accessory valve  tissues if detected incidentally ?

Largely benign and can be ignored in most.A follow up echo may be adviced once in a year or 2. (I have one anxious patient  after I reported such strands in Marfan syndrome )

In patients who has h/o stroke presence of these strands gains importance and  is an indication for anticoagulation.

Surgical excision of large strand is a dramatic option and is rarely performed.

Queries with no answers 

Is it accessory valvular (mesenchymal) tissue ?

Does Atheromatous plaque contribute to these strands in Aortic valve ?

Strands , if  disappears  by natural means , do they regrow from the same spot of raw surface  ?

Final message 

Fibrous strands detected  over the valves by routine echo are uncommon .However , It may give considerable  anxiety if  documented and reported to our patients and physicians .Though these have negligible clinical significance , the risk of stroke is increased in those with large strands.



Read Full Post »

Inferior STEMI is as  common as Anterior  STEMI .Unlike the anterior  STMI  which  auto localises  to LAD , inferior STEMI has to be fixed either RCA or LCX.

Following ECG features help localize Inferior STEMI  .

  • ST elevation in lead 3 > lead 2  suggest RCA (Not always true )
  • ST depression in lead V1,V2,V3 strongly suggest LCX. (More objectively the sum of  ST depression in V1, 2 , 3 divided by sum ST elevation in 2,3, AVF ,  if less than 1 indicate LCX.   Or simply ST depression  V3 > Lead 3 indicate LCX.)
  • ST depression in lead 1 indicate RCA
  • ST elevation in lead V6 strongly suggest LCX

Finally , and most importantly RV infarction as documented  by  ST elevation in V4R almost always localises the lesion in proximal RCA.

Role of Echo

If ECG  features  are not clear , a rapid bed side echo has a very good  localizing value. To fix RCA  look specifically for wall motion defect between “6 to  8”  O-clock position .It corresponds to  infero basal septum  that is invariably  supplied by RCA. For LCX involvement concentrate  on “3 to 6” o clock position.

stemi localisation by echo inferior rca lcx

Image source and courtesy http://www.aseuniversity.org

Which has better  outcome RCA or LCX STEMI ?

  • Though RV infarction  does not occur with  LCX , incidence  of MR is more with LCX and  can be truly troublesome. This probably negates the potential advantage of  “protected RV”  in  LCX  STEMI.
  • Since LV lateral free wall involvement  is extremely rare with RCA STEMI , it  has a lesser  impact on LV function while LCX STEMI can  give a double blow to LV   (MR and LV dysfunction)
  • On the down side ,coronary artery spasm and thrombus load are more with RCA .

Interventions in RCA is fairly straightforward ,while acute LCX PCI  has some  issues . Apart from technicalities of  intubating  the posteriorly  curving LCX ,realistically it involves fishing in troubled waters , as we need to cross the left main , likely physical contacts with LAD ostium , which is the sole supply chain for the injured and ischemic LV myocardium . Meanwhile ,  If RCA  is the culprit  , its a well cordoned crime scene where one can spend time liberally and fix the lesion.

Final message 

It is easier to localisethe culprit artery in inferior STEMI ,but its a tricky  to  predict outcome .Both can be troublesome .It depends on  dominance of the RCA/LCX ,proximal nature of lesion, the number and caliber of OMs, and PLVs and RV branch .However, it remains a fact  LCX STEMI has a  overall turbulent course.

Read Full Post »

Aortic stenosis is diagnosed by 2D valve morphology, area ,and pressure gradient across the aortic valve.Though anatomical 2D images and indices are good enough to diagnose severe AS , we are obsessed *  with pressures  which are subjected moment to moment hemodynamic and contractile variables. To record a good gradient we need a normally contracting ventricle and good flow across the narrowed LVOT. If any one of the is critically compromised  gradients can’t be picked up by Doppler.(A new entity of AS was recently included , which fails to generate the gradient in spite of good LV function and the AS being significant.)

So ,whenever one records a “Low gradient AS” there are 4 distinct possibilities.

  1. Truly mild AS
  2. Technical inadequate Doppler alignment , with possible true moderate /severe anatomical  AS .
  3. Low gradient AS due to LV dysfunction, with true moderate /severe anatomical AS
  4. Low gradient AS with Low flow but normal LV function, with true anatomically moderate/severe AS

Echocardiographer should rule out 1 and 2 before going to the complex world of low gradient severe AS.In my personal opinion , the entity of Low flow , Low gradient with Normal LV function appear  redundant ( or is it beyond my understanding ) .One should look at the valve morphology and decide in such situations.

Then , one will shortly bump into this query  is it 2 or 4 ?

How to differentiate a  technically defective  recording  of low gradient AS  from  true low flow due to narrowed LVOT.(Low gradient for me , high gradient for my professor !)

Now, basic readers  may please leave ,

Few inquisitive may ask   ( naturally though)

Does the ” low flow -low gradient AS”  is an exclusive phenomenon  that can occur only with normal LV function  or can it  occur in  dysfunctional left ventricle as well ,  who also have small cavity size and narrow LVOT  ?  (Within the low gradient AS due to LV dysfunction subset ,  How much is attributable  due to anatomial low flow  and how much is related to depressed LV contractile force ?)

Another googly . . .

Why can’t  Doubutamine* stress test  routinely  undertaken in the subset of patients with  with subjects with Low gradient /normal LV function to augment the anatomical low flow and find whether it is true  low flow or not ? *This would mean , a most impractical situation wherein every patient  with even mild AS should need to undergo dobutamine testing to rule out significant AS.

Final message

As of now ,this new concept   “Low flow , Low gradient, with Normal LV function” appears an  intellectual excess with little impact on patient outcome.The proposed new entity ultimately increase the likelyhood of over diagnosing  severe AS.Iam still expecting  more clarity  on the issue. ( or else for the moment forget the pressures and  simply fall back on  a meticulous assessment of 2D valve morphology and take a call , you will be surprised how often we get into man made scientific traps. )


1.Low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis with normal and depressed left ventricular ejection fraction.Pibarot P1, Dumesnil JG.J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012 Nov 6;60(19):1845-53

Read Full Post »

Mconnell’s  sign is a distinct echocardiographic sign that occurs in Acute pulmonary embolism , where RA and RV dilates. RV shows a distinct regional wall motion abnormality in which RV free wall shows akinesia (or severe hypokinesia ) with well-preserved RV apical contraction.This is visible in apical 4 chamber view.

This sign is explained by  both anatomic  and hemo-dyanmic reasons.

  • RV when exposed to  sudden pressure overload  it not only dilates , it’s wall stress increases (Laplace law : Wall tension = P x Radius  )   and end up mechanically stunned . But , since the RV has a complex shape the distribution of this stress  is not uniform .As the RV assumes more spherical  shape the apical  part is not exposed to this stress as it tend to abut under LV.
  • RV apex is anatomically tethered with LV apex and share significant amount of circumferential fibres .In patients with acute pulmonary embolism ,  LV usually is hyperkinteic  due to tachycardia .This pulls the  RV apex  along with it for a proxy contraction .
  • Rarely , primary RV ischemia  due to RCA under perfusion* may be responsible for this unique  wall motion defect . Since RV apex  is mostly supplied by LAD it is free from ischemia . (*Acute elevation of RV intramural pressure due to PHT , compromising RCA perfusion pressure  )


1.McConnell MV, Solomon SD, Rayan ME, Come PC, Goldhaber SZ, Lee RT. Regional right ventricular dysfunction detected by echocardiography in acute pulmonary embolism. Am J Cardiol. 1996; 78: 469–473.

2. Rachel P. SoslandKamal Gupta,McConnell’s Sign circulation. 2008; 118: e517-e518

3. Link to the Echo clipping of McConnell sign in echocardiography




Read Full Post »

Meticulous Aortic imaging is vital for assessing  atherosclerotic plaques in stroke evaluation ,  aneurysms of aorta ( Both dissecting and non dissecting.) and during aortic surgeries. Peri  procedural  aortic imaging has become mandatory in many of the complex aortic endovascular repair as well .

TEE is an extremely useful investigation and has revolutiolised our appraoch to aortic disorders .

However , we have an issue .

blind spot for tee in aortic imaging distal ascending aorta and proximal arch bracho cephalic trunk

How to overcome it ?

During peri-operative TEE a simple but innovative idea is to displace  the tracheal air with saline filled balloon and capture the aortic arch with ultra sound . What a way to un-blind our vision deep inside the thorax  !

A specific catheter is available for this purpose .

a view endo tracheal balloon catheter how to overcome the aortic blind spot in tee

Product catalog

Read Full Post »

TVI is a  hemo-dynamic  echo parameter measure from Doppler spectrum  usually in the outflow.This parameter is used to calculate cardiac output.


time velocity Integral  TVI

Time velocity Integral

What is time velocity integral  TVI echocardiography


Read Full Post »

The right ventricle  is considered as a docile cardiac chamber with passive filling and  emptying  properties .

This belief  was reinforced when Fontan  in early 1970s suggested a principle in the management of  cyanotic heart disease  when  the right side of the heart is underdeveloped. He  proved  RV can be by-passed safely , with  great veins  (IVC/SVC)  by  themselves  take care of filling the pulmonary circulation  without the need of RV pumping function.

While it is true for few complex cyanotic heart disease, largely this a misleading  concept. In clinical cardiology practice  ,sudden or non sudden  RV deaths happen every day in the form of . . .

  • RV Infarction
  • Acute RV dysfunction in massive pulmonary embolism
  • COPD with RV dysfunction
  • Most cases dilated cardiomypathy  the terminal event is due to RV  failure.

So , RV function can never be dispensable in day to day cardiac hemodynamics.

RV has some unique properties in terms of shape , size and  hemodynamics . We are getting more insights from  modern blood pool imaging by MRI , about  how the RV handles the blood volume .

We know RV has a unique shape  triangular ( partially  pyramidal ) . It can be inferred the RV cavity is formed by fusion of  many  eccentric spacial planes. We have always believed  RV handles the blood it receives from right atrium in a unique way .Now we are beginning to understand it .It is now documented the RV segregates the blood it receives into 4 components.


right ventricle physiology anatomy hemodynamics

It is curious  to know  RV inflow is connected to the outflow by an invisible   physiologic Bridge . About 44% of  blood traverse the RV in this fashion.


RVOT blood flow right ventricle

Note : RV blood flow preferentially enters the RVOT with out transiting RV body and apex.Image courtesy http://ajpheart.physiology.org/


Which is the most important part in RV ? (Among Inflow, Body, Apex, Out flow)

After reading this article it seems to me , the mechanical  function of RVOT could be most  vital. If it fails to handle the first increment  which  comes directly from  RV inflow, stasis  is likely in RV body and apex , elevating RVEDP and later promoting stasis leading to clinical events.

Clinical implication of this study

  • Differential dilatation RV chambers to pressure or volume  overload is observed .
  • We need to analyse why RV dilates in some   but   goes for hypertrophy in others when confronted with pressure overload (VPS vs PAH)
  • RV apical clot in restrictive cardiomyopathy  is a direct consequence of stasis  of blood  in RV apical zone .
  • RVOT pacing  may have a hemodynamic advantage  over RV apical pacing  . However , for anatomical reasons RV apical pacing  is  far safer than RVOT pacing where the lead  is subjected to constant life long strain due to this busy RV inflow to outflow express  high way !

Final message

Traditionally we have labeled  RV  as a  passive venous chamber .It is clearly a misnomer.It  has to handle both the venous and pumping function beat to beat with precision  without  back log .Obviously ,  RV has to think and work  more than it’s  big brother !


I wonder , if  there is  any other site other than APS . . . to  find crucial  answers in cardiac physiology  !


Right ventricle physiology blood flow  3d 4d analysisAfter thought

  • There is huge gap between physiologists  who work in research labs and the physicians at bed side .
  • I appeal all young cardiologists  to visit  APS  once in a while ,between your busy cath lab schedule and help narrow this gap.
  • Without understanding the physiology properly how are we going to intervene the pathology ?


Read Full Post »

Older Posts »