Home | Aim of this blog | Archives
July 22, 2011 4:44 am
“Limitations of a study” column appear in scientific articles because . . .
I fail to understand , why even good articles are rejected for minor errors in methodology by many journals.
Meanwhile , how on this earth it’ s possible ? for some articles to appear in top journals ( with questionable conclusions ) embellished
with major errors in methodology , but has a proud declaration and confession about the flaws of the study in the “Limitations of study” column !
So , in this modern scientific world , it suggests to me , one can can write whatever you think as science , as long as you declare it and able to impress the editors to shift the errors into limitations column , you are likely to be excused and also rewarded !
Posted by dr s venkatesan
Categories: Cardiology - Clinical, Cardiology -Interventional -PCI, cardiology -Therapeutics, Cardiology -unresolved questions, cardiology-ethics
Tags: gimmicks called statisitcs, impact factors in journals, limitations of study, modern scientific papers, original research, randomised controlled studies, rct
Mobile Site | Full Site
Get a free blog at WordPress.com Theme: WordPress Mobile Edition by Alex King.