
Posts Tagged ‘bio ethics’
Forbidden quotes in medicine
Posted in Uncategorized, tagged best quote on medical ethics, bio ethics, british journal of medical ethics, ethical dysfunction, future of noble profession, Hippocratic oath, indian journal of medical ethics, journal of medical ethics, Lown Institute, medical education, medical ethics, modified hippocratic oath, taboo topics in medical science on April 22, 2024|
My dear physician , don’t feel ashamed to prescribe Digoxin for Atrial fibrillation !
Posted in Uncategorized, tagged bio ethics, digoxin, drugs for atrial fibrillation, how to practice medicine on July 1, 2016| Leave a Comment »
It was delicate few minutes in one of my recent visits to a corporate hospital , when I noticed an emergency physician hesitated to follow my advice to prescribe IV Digoxin for a patient with Atrial fibrillation and fast ventricular rate.His fear was, his consultant, a modern day cardiologist wouldn’t like it as Amiodarone has become a default drug for atrial fibrillation in that Institution. I could sense. . .he felt so out of place to take on my suggestion.
I reminded the young physician , the uniqueness of Digoxin and its un-diminished value for this particular indication ,still he was reluctant and didn’t oblige.
I realised , it was my mistake to expect a place for the humble fox glove in corporate crash-carts of centrally climate controlled cardiology suits !
“Medicine need to be practiced not only with best science(Truth) but also in a holistic and cost efficient manner . There is no place for glamor, glitter and commerce in your prescriptions ! In near future , teaching Medicine to students would essentially become “more of moral” than “science” .
Reference
Link -Which is the best combination for rate control in Atrial fibrillation
A truth about half truths . . .
Posted in dr s venkatesan -Personal, Venkat quotes, tagged bio ethics, hippocrates, medical ethics, medical quptes, philosophy in medicine on October 31, 2012| Leave a Comment »
A truth about half truths!
Arthur Garson explores further . Click on the Image to get a sample page from Amazon
Why doctors are referred to as “Practicing” Medicine
Posted in bio ethics, cardiology-ethics, general medicine, Uncategorized, tagged art of practice of medcine, bio ethics, doctor patient relationship, ethics in cardiology, ethics in medicine, experimental medicine, hippocrates, medcial ethics, modern medicine, patient vs physician, principle of practice of medicine, why medicine is not science on August 1, 2010| Leave a Comment »
It is often quoted “Practice makes every one perfect” . . . Doctors continue to practice for ever . . .If practice is only a rehearsal , when do they perform for real ?
And , we know a doctor spends his entire life time practicing . . . In other words doctors are only experimenting .
So , do not get fooled by his errors . Errors are bound to happen during their practicing sessions !
The problem with general public is , they never understand this basic fact – medical science is nothing but a , on going research on human body .If only we understand this we can accept the millions of medical mistakes* that occur every day in the global medical profession . The major aim of modern medical science is to reduce that .
* Of course, negligence is a punishable offense . But, we should also realise , non- negligent medical mistakes are many fold higher than negligent ones .
While a careful doctor will avoid negligent mistakes a thinking doctor will avoid non -negligent mistakes also.
This puts onus back on doctors. We need to critically analyse , every
treatment modality we follow .
If you are a strong believer of “Medicine is indeed a science and doctors are scientists ” , please read this article from British medical journal and conclude yourself.
http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/328/7454/0-h
Further reading
The bestseller How doctors think
Picture courtesy : Jupeter stock Images
The fine art of converting healthy persons into patients .
Posted in bio ethics, tagged 64 slice ct scan, bio ethics, cardiologist, cardiology, coronary care, ethics in cardiology, fibroid uterus, hippocrates, master health check up, noble profession, non ulcer dyspepsia, osteoporosis, preventive medicine, preventive screening, stemi on February 24, 2010| 1 Comment »
Common sense would indicate medical care is meant for the sick and ill . Relieving the mankind from all those suffering with a healing hand has made the medical profession noble and sacred .Medical science grew with this sole aim many centuries ago .Some times we succeeded and many times we failed and the journey is continuing .
In those days ,scientists were dedicated , inventions were genuine and were driven by a need to conquer a diseases .Some where along the line, (May be in the last 2-3 decades?) our quest for money power exceeded commonsense . Commerce entered every walk of life and medical science became the biggest causality.
The purpose of noble profession was forgotten . Simultaneously public awareness and quality if life vastly improved in many of the developed countries . So the traditional illnesses either disappeared or reduced to a great extent . Then came the life style diseases.The cost of treating an illness spiraled too much especially in the scientifically advanced countries . What was perceived as great health care system became the most ridiculed health system in the planet ?
Why ? The simplest answer to this q is
In the name of science and modernity , medical treatment was glorified beyond the level it deserves , and hence the cost of treatment is kept at artificially & foolishly high (This often involves diagnostic exploration of human body with modern gadgets without any meaningful purpose ) .
ie , In a nutshell of modern medicine is often a medical mirage than a miracle . We know , the chances of success as we try to chase it. If we think the world is waking on this issue .
We are in for a surprise ! Even as every one is asking for outcome analysis in modern health care
more and more countries just imitate the failed ( Scientific and moral failure ) western models of health care .
When major illness are reducing in a society what will the health care providers do ?
Feel happy ? Yes that’s what a sane mind would do . In a capital rich , health conscious , knowledge driven society the opposite happens .
When the patient input into a top hospital reduces , the MBAs in them plan strategies to bring increase the bed occupancy rate and maintain patient parity.
If sufficient patients are not there in a community what shall we do ?
Create more patients
Creating new patients is a too dangerous game , what shall we do ?
In the name of preventive screening let us label normal persons as patients .
How to do it ?
The following examples are personal observation made in huge city of educated elite in a developing country . Excuse me if it offends a few . . .
Define, redefine all criteria that define the disease (There are
- Make, 130/85mmhg of blood pressure as pre hypertension and make them visit our HT clinic every month.
- In the name of risk stratification do CRP, Micro HDL , Apo a etc and catch them for primary risk reduction for a non existing illness
- Let us label all the age related bone loss as deadly osteoporosis and do bone graft.
- Let us call the occasional post dinner stiff stomach as non ulcer dyspepsia and insert a endoscope into the patient tummy .
- Do a 64slice CT in a master health check and convert many of the healthy normals into carriers soft coronary plaques.
- Do a ultra sound scan in every one who takes alcohol and give our brains a temptation to label the normal fatty streaks as infiltrative fat disorder .
- Do routine pelvic scan and detect sub clinical fibroid uterus as potentially malignant and post them for hysterectomy on the next operation day.
- Convert all healthy women as a potential cervical cancer and administer herpes vaccine and help the vaccine company share move up in wall street !
- Finally , screen all our playful kids for learning disability and label them as slow attention deficit disorder and make their life permanently miserable .
The list is endless . . .
Final message
We are in a era , where even a simple illness ( common cold ? ) can be converted into a billion dollar industry . ( Are you aware of H1N1 fiasco , The role of WHO and mystery labeling of pandemic !)
While the above misadventure with scientific excesses goes on merrily , lest we forget , millions of children and adults suffer in misery for want of live saving investigations and drugs in any country .
When a person with a head injury dies due a missed subdural hematoma for want of CT scan in one hospital , ” in the adjacent hospital” a wealthy and healthy man ( who got admitted for master health check up ) undergoes a series of scans all over the body even as he is watching the satellite TV in the comfort of a five star suite !
God will never forgive the noble professionals if they are part of this negative health care forces
Finally ending with a very positive note !
The new initiative by Obama , ” Health care for the uninsured ” is to be welcomed as great move and will do a world of good .
But , our only request to WHO ( or related bodies ) is to create a forum or authority to impeach all fancy diseases from the medical literature !
Medical pharmacology is not simply learning how a drug acts , it is also about “How a drug company acts*” !
Posted in Uncategorized, tagged bio ethics, mechanism of drug action, pharma industry, pharmacology on September 19, 2009| Leave a Comment »
Pharmacology is a major discipline in medicine where we learn how a drug acts in our body for various ailments . Now in this era , doctors need not only how a drug acts but also how a drug company acts ! This has become vitally important for the welfare of the mankind .
In this context one of the best books on medical pharmacology is from the
Famous Editor of New England journal of medicine
A must read for all genuine medical professionals
Watch Marcia Angell talk http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ouF3ISihHLM
Full lecture of Mercia Angell http://videos.med.wisc.edu/videoInfo.php?videoid=940
Click to buy/read the book http://www.amazon.com/Truth-About-Drug-Companies-Deceive/dp/0375508465#reader
A Review about the book http://calitreview.com/176
Sending home a patient without a diagnosis is not a crime !
Posted in bio ethics, cardiology-ethics, general medicine, tagged annals of internal medicine, bio ethics, cecil, conflicts, davidson, diagnosis, doctor, ethics, harrisons, health care, jama, lancet, medical errors, medical science, medical student, medicinehippocrates, mmodern medicine, nejm, principles of practice of medicine, pseudo science, who on December 9, 2008| Leave a Comment »
One of the important principles of medicine is “Diagnosis should always precede treatment”
This quote , though appear reasonable , can not be practiced always especially in emergencies, where we have to first stabilise the patient without a prior diagnosis .(Like administering IV fluids in hypotension , acetaminophen for fever , etc)
Modern medicine considers treating a patient without a diagnosis as unscientific.
But, it is a well recognised fact , millions of decision in everyday medical practice is not based on scientific diagnosis but on clinical acumen and empirical therapy . There are many instances wherein , we are never near the diagnosis even after exhaustive investigations.
Ironically , in this era of evidence based medicine , when we are unable to conclude , we are forced to do the most funniest thing , namely converting patient’s symptom itself as disease entity and be happy in labelling them. Like , Motion sickness , poly-arthritis, , chronic fatigue syndrome, adult respiratory distress syndrome , pre mature ejaculation, fever of unknown origin , attention deficit disorder , etc (The list is endless . . .)
This happens because physicians always feel guilty if they are unable to label a patient with a disease entity.
Is the guilt justified ? Not necessarily so ! Symptomatic treatment without diagnosis is the most dominant theme even today (Fever, pain etc ).So don’t feel unduly negative* when one is not able to fit a patent’s symptom into a disease entity but ensure he gets relief from his symptom.
*Except of course , one has to rule out a serious disorder.
Comments welcome







