As we practice this Noble (& Delicate ) profession ,we often tend to Ignore the warnings even from our learnt colleagues , Why ?
Posted in bio ethics, cardiology innovation, Cardiology quotes, cardiology-ethics, Venkat quotes, Wintage cardiology, tagged aga asd device ado 1 2 figulla flex 2, asd vasd pda device closure, cath lab nightmares, cath lab tricks and techniques, dr s venkatesan, ego vs wisdom, venkat quotes, wisdom quotes, wisdom vs knowledge on July 28, 2014| Leave a Comment »
As we practice this Noble (& Delicate ) profession ,we often tend to Ignore the warnings even from our learnt colleagues , Why ?
Posted in bio ethics, medical quotes, Two line sermons in cardiology, Venkat quotes, tagged drug regulation act, hippocrates quote, medical ethics, medical quotes on July 10, 2014| 3 Comments »
I frequently refer to one of the most famous medical quotes made in last century by a Harvard professor Dr Herbert Lay in 1969.
Five decades have gone since this observation was made by Dr Ley .Mind you ,Dr Ley is not a lay person , he was heading the same FDA which he targeted ! I guess when Dr Ley made this statement there was little commercialization in pharma Industry . Now along with it an entirely new field of medical device industry has grown to gargantuan proportions !
I wonder what Dr Herbert Ley would have to say as on 2014 !
Many modern medical professionals would shrug these views as controversial , pessimistic and negative forces of science !
Here I borrow my own quote from venkat@thoughts
Posted in bio ethics, cardiology -Therapeutics, Cardiology classics, Cardiology quotes, medical quotes, Morality in medicine, Two line sermons in cardiology, tagged edward banfield, modern medicine and banfield theory, moral basis of backward society, private vs public health care on June 15, 2014|
Shall I begin with a provocative quote (My own !)
Inability to think beyond self , family, private life reflects a backward and immature state of human mind
How to eradicate this backwardness we all suffer from !
I stumbled upon a book which made me wonder , whether eradication of backwardness is little to do with education ! It lies much, much deeper in our cortical thinking influenced by inheritance , evolution , culture and economy .
The stunning truth was exemplified by American political scientist Edward C. Banfield .A must read for every one who have mind for society , community and the humanity !
In this book he introduced a new term to describe this self centered thinking as “Amoral familism”
“Banfield concluded that human plight was rooted in the distrust, envy and suspicion displayed by them in relations with each other. Fellow citizens would refuse to help one another, except where one’s own personal material gain was at stake. Many attempted to hinder their neighbors from attaining success, believing that others’ good fortune would inevitably harm their own interests”
Banfield theroy and “Moral Bankruptcy in Modern medical care”
I am afraid there is a compelling link between Banfield’s observation in a remote Italian village to the current medical community mind set who care only for their patients who pay them and keep them happy !
If you think education will eradicate social backwardness ,Why ? one of the most highly educated community that form the noble profession remain backward in their thinking !
How do you explain innumerable instances of hospitals , doctors shutting doors for lesser humans even in dire emergencies ! ?
Why do many of them join hands with powers that can be detrimental to the overall health of the society ?
The stunning irony is , they do it unashamed (with pleasure at times!) in violation of the oath they take when they join the Noble profession. Shall we call it as ” Moral Bankruptcy in medical care ?
Read further
Moral Basis of a Backward Society
Highlights of this book (Text from Wikipedia)
The Moral Basis of a Backward Society is a book by Edward C. Banfield, a political scientist who visited Montegrano, Italy . He observed a self-interested, family centric society which sacrificed the public good for the sake of nepotism and the immediate family. Banfield as an American was witnessing what was to become infamous as the “mafia” or families that cared only for its own “members” at the expense of their fellow citizens. Banfield postulated that the backwardness of such a society could be explained ‘largely but not entirely’ by ‘the inability of the villagers to act together for their common good or, indeed, for any end transcending the immediate, material interest of the nuclear family’.
Posted in bio ethics, Cardiology -Mechnisms of disease, Cardiology -Therapeutic dilemma, cardiology -Therapeutics, Cardiology -unresolved questions, medical quotes, tagged art of medicine, cath lab tips and tricks, clinico pathologic conference, controversial decisions in cardiology, coronary care unit decision, cpc in medicine, critical thinking in medicine, emprical medicine, evidence based medicine, experince based medicine, how doctors think, levels of evidence in medicine, medical decision making, medical ethics, medical problem solving, problem solving in medicine, role of medical gudilines, tough decicions in medicine, ward rounds on June 8, 2014| Leave a Comment »
Answer
While our brain perceives whatever option we choose is the best for the patient , in reality it is rarely true !
The only comment I wish to make, there is nothing called standard guidelines for complex and unusual problems .We need not be obsessed with protocols !
Please remember , If you apply standard guidelines in non-standard situations 9/10 times we are going to err !
So my choice would be, to go with your gut feeling , of course your gut should be alive , up to date and periodically maintained !
If you don’t have the guts . . . don’t worry you have plenty of other options !
Posted in bio ethics, Cardiology - Clinical, Clinical cardiology, medical quotes, Two line sermons in cardiology, tagged alfred noble noble profession, medical ethics, modern medicine, nobel prize for medicine, principles of practice of medicine, science humanity medicine on May 23, 2014| Leave a Comment »
Why not Nobel prize for clinical science ?
Nobel prize was constituted to reward people or organisation who make a huge impact on the welfare of man kind. It is given in various categories for outstanding contributions in Physics, Chemistry, Literature, Peace, Physiology or Medicine, and Economic Sciences
Unfortunately, there is a strong bias towards raw basic science when it is given in the filed of medicine.Do you know ,there is no Nobel prize exclusive for medical science ? It shares with human physiology the only field included for Nobel prize in medicine.
Evolution of human history reveals it is not the stunning scientific discoveries that impact the mankind . It is largely dependent on how we use them . It is true and natural ,invention of sub atomic particles , decoding quantum mechanics and trans-cellular signals always generate great interest than others.
In medical science, time and again we have seen problems arise in applying fruits of scientific research into practical usage in the patient domain in the bedside.
What is use of rewarding inventor of nitric oxide with a Nobel prize , when billion-dollar nitrate industry is thriving on a non existing life long indication of stable angina .
It is surprising to note , Nobel committee does give credit to wisdom & intellect while awarding prize in peace, literary or economic sciences. For some reason it lacks such a vision when it comes to medical sciences !
We have seen Nobel prize being awarded to organization that strive for peace and welfare of society and community like UN ,EU etc.The world health organization is the premier power supposed to provide and regulate the health in this planet.I do not recall any time WHO was close to considered for the Noble prize in medicine !
Nobel Ironies
Nobel committee rewards economists who point out lacunae in vital world macro and micro economics theories.
Dubious men(Heads of state ) are decorated with Noble peace prizes for preventing a war in one geographical area while doing exactly the opposite elsewhere !
In this modern millennium where scientific pursuits are contaminated and many of the research questions are misdirected or irrelevant , Nobel committee needs a through rejig in the manner in which medical Nobel prize is being awarded. We know ,Noble’s death wish was to award the brightest mind with highest scientific breakthroughs in those world . . . but
I guess Alfred Nobel if alive would have changed his rules .He wouldn’t have imagined modern science would systematically devalue common sense and reinventing it would also deserve an award equivalent to Nobel !
Some of the medical discoveries that deserve noble medical prize
How about Nobel prize in cardiology for preventive cardiologist who successfully terminates a million statin prescription and restoring natural exercise directed lipid regulation in them ?
How about Noble prize for a noble physician sitting in corporate hospital infested with all commercial ingredients who could resist and argue successfully against inappropriate tonsillectomies and appendectomies ?
I am sure , such a man will be a laughing stock for most of us !
An appeal to Nobel committee
It is a wish , Noble prize in medicine is to be included for people who do yeomen services in preventive and clinical care and professional who carry forward the legacy of caring for the sick with clinical application of available scientific wisdom !
In this scientifically obsessed world , It will be a new beginning in the way future medical research will be directed and nurtured ! Only then the true power of Noble prize in medicine will be realised !
Reference
Link to Wikipedia Nobel prize in Medicine
Posted in bio ethics, cardiology -Preventive, medical quotes, Two line sermons in cardiology, tagged cardiology ethics, conflicts of interest, doctors honesty, future of medicine, hippocrates oath, medical auditing, medical bio ethics, medical commerce, medical economics, medical ethics, medical research, moral education for medical students, motivated research, physician behavior, stemi primary pci, teaching ethics for doctors, unethical medical practices on April 14, 2014| Leave a Comment »

Tree of life : When professional morality suffers a mortality . . . human health becomes a causality !
Link to a wonderful article on moral education for our kids in medical school !
Posted in bio ethics, cardiology-ethics, cath lab tips and tricks, medical quotes, Two line sermons in cardiology, tagged abandoning cath lab procedure, cath lab complications, cath lab tips and tricks, ethics in cath lab, extraordianry interventional cardiologist, interventional cardiologist, invasive cardiologist, pci ptca, primary pci, who is interventional cardiologist on March 4, 2014| Leave a Comment »
Posted in bio ethics, Cardiology classics, Cardiology quotes, My favorite quote, tagged cardiology ethics, cardiology quotes, clinical cardiology, happy new year 2014, my favorites quotes on January 1, 2014| 3 Comments »
Dear friends,
It all started in 2008. This is 6th year of my attempt to share knowledge in cardiology.The followers of my blog is the only strength that sustain my writing .
Wishing you all a Happy , wonderful and a prosperous , New year 2014
But . . . please be reminded we don’t require a New year to bring a bout of happiness , it is sitting right in our minds every day !
On this day let me quote my most revered quote of Hemmingway.
Ernest Hemmingway the Nobel laureate who was born in USA, Lived in Paris , fought in world war 2 , lived in the deep forests of Africa with wild animals during the fag end of his life .He had a Intimate relationship with Cuba, made a passionate appeal to end the man made disaster called wars in this planet , before his life ended in 1961.
To connect with this noble (Nobel ) soul reach through Wikipedia Link
Posted in bio ethics, Cardiology - Clinical, Cardiology -Pacemakers and ICD, cardiology -Therapeutics, Cardiology -unresolved questions, medical quotes, tagged ethics in cardiology, thromolysis vs priamry pci, vvi vs ddd pacemaker on December 29, 2013| Leave a Comment »
Following are revered facts . . . among the “Guardians of Cardiology” !

When false truths are synthesized to conceal a true myth . . . where will the poor myth complain ?Following are revered facts . . . among the “Guardians of Cardiology” !