Feeds:
Posts
Comments

In L TGV  ventricles are Inverted . Since , coronary  arteries go with  the respective ventricle  , LAD originates from Right sinus , and RCA arises from Left sinus . (Complex anomalies  in origin, course still possible )  LAD supplies   venous ventricle . RCA  supplies systemic ventricle .

The most surprising Irony is that major epicardial  branches run in their respective grooves in the bulk of the patients with L TGV .The LAD runs  in anterior interventricular  groove and LCX in left AV groove etc. (That’s real  power of nature , these epicardial branches home in to their grooves even in the midst of bizarre AV and VA connection !)

Here is the the ultimate reference  article ;  A  study from 255 hearts with C TGV . I wonder ,  we will  never  get a study like this ! 

coronary anatomy in corrected transpostion og great arteries ltga c tgv Ltgv annals of thoracic surgery 1994

Questions to ponder

  1. Is RCA  blood flow adequate to support systemic ventricle ?
  2. If this RCA is a non dominant  one what happens to this ventricular function ?

Implication in surgery

Progressive RV dysfunction is a major determiant of long term outcome . Unless we do an arterial switch  diverting respective ventricular flow  it  is not going to help much in the long term

coronary anatomy in corrected transpostion og great arteries ltga c tgv Ltgv 2
Link to full text article

Wandering pacemaker is benign  cardiac arrhythmia . The only danger  is , it can create false alarm .This patient was referred   as  AV dissociation

wandering pacemaker

Read a related article  from this site .  ( A restless pacemaker goes for a walk down the  lane )

wandering pacemaker

wandering pacemaker

In the  2013 American diabetic association(ADA)  annual meet  a paper was presented   which raised  many eye brows ! . The  results were flashed across mainstream media. Published in New England journal of medicine online.

Look Ahead ADA lifes style  NEJM

It may be a  well conducted  trial  but  poorly interpreted  one . It reports one of  the dubious   observations  as a major conclusion  and  confuse the public.

Life style modification is the key to prevent  major diabetic  and cardiac events  . This is well  proved beyond doubt.

Epidemiological evidence  from various  global health  statistics  accumulated over a century will vouch for primary prevention of  diabetic and cardio vascular disease .

Link to Editorial on Look Ahead  : http://www.nejm.org

Why this study wants to make  a mockery of this fact ?  .Fortunately the accompanying  editorial  has  realistically  reported the implications of this study.

Final message

I argue the medical fraternity and patients to ignore this  study . It can be convincingly concluded something is seriously wrong with the outcome analysis  ,  however  modern may be the statistics. Some  groups are obviously worried about the natural and effective control of diabetic by good life style alone . It is a clear case of confusing the public .

There is huge collective evidence  and  common sense  for the  increased physical activity to reduce  cardio vascular risk  (INTERHEART)

Final Message

If life style modification is not going to help  . . . what is the alternative  to our patients ?

Drugs . . . yes  . . . one has to depend on it   . . . this study  seems to suggest .

To me, this is  a dangerous study   . It  plays a spoil sport on a great fact and  belief . This paper  should never have been published in a journal  like  NEJM . Atleast the conclusion  should  have  been re-written !

I guess this study would  promote the  Homo-sapiens  to  be inactive  and  make them diabetic and  consume drugs  perennially !

Reference

http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa1212914?query=OF 

This is a wonderful   and  realistic article on the Issue by none other than  former Health secretary of the Government of India  Ms Sujatha Rao

medical  education In  India

http://www.thehindu.com/opinion/lead/doctors-by-merit-not-privileg

I stumbled upon this  web   site . I think this  can be  glorified as the  standing  example  for     “Democracy  of science”

INTECH open science  open mind

http://www.intechopen.com/subjects/cardiology-and-cardiovascular-medicine

Spinal cord is a busy  neurological  highway to brain .It  runs  24/7  non stop  with unlimited  horizontal and vertical lanes .It is such a compact  structure , it can  easily  get confounded   when multiple signals converge,  diverge, summate , deduct , reflect back,   or cancel out .
A 64 year old women came to me for  second opinion  regarding   chest pain . A  cardiologist  had  just adviced her  an  emergency   coronary  angiogram and also suggested she may require an  urgent  PCI  as well .
I listened to her history in my office  . . .  In  her own words .
Doctor , I am  getting  sudden   compressing  type of  pain which  starts in the centre of the chest and soon transmits to the left shoulder and  gradually reach the inner aspect of the hand up to the little finger . And occasionally it is very severe and some times i feel like sweating as well ! I am unable to predict when it comes doctor !
It was  so convincing  but one  feature was  not fitting In . She said , she used to walk  daily   and do all house hold work with no pain . She also  recalled about the  acid peptic disease , and neck pain periodically due to cervical spine problem.
Her resting ECG was normal .She was  afraid to do a stress test . After thinking  for a minute , I had no  other option  but  to endorse  my colleague’s view and asked her  to go for coronary angiogram .
One  thing I  suggested differently was , I told her it was not an  emergency , I also  conveyed my gut feeling  that it is unlikely to cardiac  pain . One week  later  CAG through radial route  was done . Both of  us were  happy  to find a  normal  coronary  angiogram !

Final message

Pain is a  feeling . It can be  perceived  at  multiple levels  . The site of origin , spill over on transit and at the level of brain .  A patient with multiple  potential source for pain can either summate , deduct , reflect  or cancel out .This can confuse the clinician in a dramatic fashion as it did to us ! . To complicate the matters  further , gastric pain can trigger a cervical  pain and vice versa . (Spill over effect)

Only fools will   manage unstable angina  medically !
 
That was exactly the statement ,  one popular Interventional  cardiologist   told a small gathering  in one of the weekly meet .
 
Do you agree ? 
 
 
 
 
 
Answer
 
We can’t  make a blanket  statement like that . We have clear  guidelines (Of course as licensed and certified cardiology  practitioner  you have  every right to violate it !)  .
 
UA is risk stratified in Low , Intermediate and High risk  categories .Only high risk group  require emergency Intervention .Even in high risk group there are some reservation.(ICTUS  study )
 
There are some very mild forms of  UA (High grade stable angina precipitated by an emotional stress will exactly mimic UA. Similarly most  secondary UA due to tachyardia , Anemia  etc should not  cause an alarm .)
 
 
*Please note  , currently coronary angiogram is included in medical  investigation  in most  patients with UA . The  confusion in interpreting  such statements  is partly because many physicians/ cardiologists consider  doing a coronary angiogram by itself an  Interventional  management
 
 
Reference

This  is the story of a 55 year old  women ,  who was received  in our CCU  with a  dramatic STEMI (ECG looked like an action potential ) ,  LV  S 3  and  hypotension.    It was impending cardiogenic shock.Since we do not have full fledged primary PCI  program  , thrombolysis was planned. She had  cardiac arrest   immediately after  starting streptokinase infusion . She  was  promptly shocked  and  revived .  The ECG changes rapidly  reversed(ECG -3) . Every other  hemodynamic parameter got stabilised as well . To our surprise   ( few hours later ) this patient  was  so comfortable , sat up on her bed ,  demanded a discharge . (Which was refused of course !)  One week  later coronary angiogram was done, a near complete recannalisation of RCA was documented.

ECG 1 on arrival
Inferior MI 2  

ECG -2 Developed cardiac arrest  10 minutes  after  starting the Streptokinase Infusion

primary VF 2

ECG -3 .Taken few minutes following   the VF

inferior MI evolved 2

 

Acute myocardial infarction (STEMI)  kills more than a million life every year . Majority of death  happens within an hour of onset of symptoms. Ventricular fibrillation  is the arrhythmia of death. Why this occurs  only in  few , while  many are  immune to it ?

God keeps  this secret  close to his chest ,  how and why  he selects   candidates for this arrhythmia !

Scientists are still  far away  in finding the truth . But , one thing  is obvious .The  moment   coronary artery is totally occluded  , the heart begins a fight  and try  to  get rid of this obstruction . In the process ,  it  goes into convulsion (VF)  with a foolish belief  , it  can shrug of the thrombotic insult . Death often   ensues if  not intervened . (Very rarely  VF can be a non sustained one  and patient survives cardiac arrest !)

VF  as  a electrical  response  to  reperfusion injury .

Often times ,  we witness patients  to  go  for  VF  very early following thrombolysis . The  thrombus in situ is an irritant , it  triggers the inherent fibrinolytic system (Natural TPA included) If it is successful  it opens the occlusion ( atleast partially )  and salvages the myocardium .If the fate is against  the patient , very early reperfusion of IRA triggers  VF  .  If this occurs at home   survival  is  low .If  the VF occur at hospital the probability of survival is near 100 % .

               The  intensity of  natural lytic mechanism  is the major determinant  of   early reperfusion . Ironically  the same  factor   determines  occurrence of the deadly  VF .

I would believe  , the STEMI patients  who die early (even before reaching  the hospital ) are (un) blessed with a  fighting  heart  ! Ironically , the lazy hearts  reach the hospital  alive ! (slow &  steady win the race !) .  Of course , reperfusion  injury is not the only mechanism of VF . Other common suspect is  left main STEMI .

Link to related video “Ignorance based  cardiology ”

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J9DH6Vr04es

Final message

While , VF  is  referred  to as arrhythmia  of death , it may  in-fact , represent  a common form  of  reperfusion arrhythmia in  the setting of  STEMI !  .  . .  Hence , it can  Initiate  a new lease of life in  many   lucky ones !  I hope the title of this article  makes sense  !

  1. The concept of  FFR is based on pressure gradient  alone.In any hydraulic model (Both biological and non biological systems ) pressure difference  is the least   important parameter  that determines flow.
  2. FFR  is unphysiological  as hyperemia   is  artificially induced one .(Adenosine  is not the only parameter that determines it !)
  3. Serial obstructions and branch point hemodynamics are  conveniently ignored.
  4. Reproducibility  remains a big question mark .
  5. On safety  issues  FFR  is a suspect.( Often times , it  requires expertise comparable to  that of a  complex  PCI !) .Beware , the FFR unit has stiff catheter system and is an additional health hazard .  I have witnessed   atleast two cases  where  insignificant lesions were  made significant by  FFR related Injury .
  6. And  now the  knock out punch ,  ! Probably the most vital  issue for which FFR should be banished * , it is not taking into account of vulnerabilty of a plaque .( An FFR > .9 with a hanging , eccentric , mid LAD lesion was left alone by one of the  academically up to date ,  evidence  based interventional cardiologist!  )
           (*If perfomed  in isolation without IVUS/OCT  )
I am still wondering how this concept came into cardiologist domain and into the cath lab .It should have  never been let out of theoretical physics labs !
Final message
The best way to assess physiological significance of an anatomical obstruction is  to  do  exercise  stress test .
If  the lesion is  able to sustain good exercise capacity , it  can be deemed physiological unimportant.
While , this is an explicit  proof  in single vessel disease  ,  even  in   multivessel  CAD ,   EST  is   a  collective  measure of  coronary  reserve flow .( Something like instantaneous equivalent of virtual  multivessel  FFR  )
Moderated After thought
FFR is a highly specialized theoretical  tool , that has very limited role in cath lab .
The two major practical (Non academic)  use of FFR   is to shun away  those   internet fed ,  annoying, pseudo  intellectual patients ,  who constantly ask for  angioplasty  for  obliviously insignificant lesions !
FFR comes very handy  to  bail out  cardiologists at  times of distress   ! (To escape  from the wrath of our patients   after a sub optimal &  technically inferior   PCIs   and   in  the  long term confabulations  in   restenosis  after stenting !  )

//

Pacemaker current is   strangely  referred  by physiologists  as  funny current (I f ) . I am yet to find the exact reason .  This is the current  that  sustain  our life right from the day 22  of  embryonic life when the  cardiac jelly beats for the first time.   SA node  solemnly  follow our  entire life  before  making  a  bid-adieu !

pacemaker  potential sa node 5

 

pacemaker current if funny current poential 002

pacemaker current if funny current poential 003

What is contribution of  If  current in the overall Pace-making  activity ?
This  has not been quantified . The fact that ,  Ivabradine induced  If  current  blockade does not result in serious bradycardia indicate  , SA node has alternate reserve currents as well . ( SA node  is a such a mystery  structure , it would never be a  surprise , if we  find many more  “not so funny”  currents !)