Let me see how many find sense in this Nonsense !
Posts Tagged ‘interventional cardiology’
Learn the essence of Interventional coronary care in 180 seconds flat !
Posted in Cardiology -Therapeutic dilemma, cardiology -Therapeutics, Cardiology -unresolved questions, tagged csa, ethics in cardiology, interventional cardiology, management of pci, pci ptca in a nutshell, priamry pci vs thrombolysis, stemi vs nstemi on October 3, 2014| 1 Comment »
Your clock starts now !
Chronic stable angina : Most can be effectively managed by optimal /intensive medicines and life style Interventions .About 10% will require PCI/CABG.
ACS – STEMI: Primarily managed with rapid and competent pre-hospital care with prompt thrombolysis in or out of hospital .Patients with large STEMI who develop complications (Again about 10 %) require PCI and few additional lives can be saved.
ACS-NSTEMI : This is the group that demand an important role for PCI . All true high risk UA/NSTEMI patients should receive urgent coronary angiogram and critical lesions should either be stented or sent for CABG (If the lesions are multiple and complex ) The field of interventional cardiology is expected to play a major role in this category of patients for the simple reason , we not only give dramatic relief from angina and also prevent a potentially a huge MI that is waiting to happen !
* It is vital to emphasise the “Aim and objective” in NSTEMI management is critically different from other two. We know , in CSA the aim is to give relief symptoms and improve excercise capacity . Both PCI/CABG are unlikely to prevent a future MI in CSA..In STEMI it has already occurred .The aim is to salvage myocardium and prevent future events. While PCI can do the former , it can’t do the later . In STEMI scenerio ,we have very good alternate modality called thrombolysis which can easily beat the pPCI in , cost , availability and time (and hence efficiency as well in most countries !)
Counter thought
The above suggestion is too simplified ,generalized , misleading , and unscientific, should strongly be disagreed. For those people who disagree , I provide an alternate scheme .It is ultra short ,comes in 5 lines .Very practical and scientific too !
In any patient , who is suspected to have either acute or chronic coronary syndromes ,take them to the cath lab in an urgent or semi urgent fashion .Do an angiogram and stent all lesions that you feel important . If stenting is not possible manage with optimal medicines and /or send them to the surgeons.
Final message
The essence of catheter based coronary care is simple.We complicate it. To understand this concept 100’s of cardiology journals and as many conferences and infinite number of books are churned out every year !
Unscientific quotes for the interventional cardiologists
Posted in Uncategorized, tagged cath lab, drug eleuting stents, interventional cardiology, pci, ptca on December 21, 2008| Leave a Comment »
A poorly deployed drug eluting stent is far inferior to a properly deployed bare metal stents
- Doing a plain old balloon angioplasty ( POBA) is not a scientific crime , millions of coronary lesion just need that! ( Click here -Why POBA is important ? )
- PCI is most effective during an ACS than a chronic coronary syndrome
- Primary PCI is a race against time and muscle , not a race against money ! Don’t do it for a evolved MI
- Recognise , from the patient point of view the term no reflow is generally synonymous with failed primary PCI( It is semantics !)
- Side branch can be more important than main branches , so don’t sacrifice it often
- Attempting a trifurcation angioplasty is generally not in the interest of the patient but to show interventional expertise
- Make sure surgical back up means, a table is reserved with a surgeon fully informed and ready
When in doubt , it is always better to err on a longer stent than a shorter one
Is plaque fissure or rupture painful ?
Posted in cardiology- coronary care, tagged acs, chest pain, coronary plaque, dissection, drsvenkatesan, interventional cardiology, nstemi, stemi on July 19, 2008| Leave a Comment »
Plaque fissure ,rupture and subsequent thrombois is the hallmark of acute coronary syndrome . Are these events painful ? We always attribute any chest pain in an ACS patient to ischemia of myocardium.Is that always true? Coronary artery also has a rich vasa nervorum that could be activated by plaque disruption.
Why we need an answer to this question ?
We are triaging patients for early invasive apporach based on chestpain .
Many patients may be subjected to revascularisation process for an non ischemic coronary pain !