Every pacemaker has a metallic “Reed switch” . Putting this switch on and off is possible with an external magnet .The circuitry is such that , switching on makes sensing function null and void.It functions as asynchronous mode.In other words pacemaker converts to a mandatory pacing mode .All sensing related issues are immediately removed.
Note : This switch can be activated by any strong magnetic filed applied externally .And removing the magnet disconnects the circuit.
When a magnet is applied the pacemakers changes the mode in the following way.
- VVI to VOO (Paces only ventricle without sensing)
- AAI to AOO (Paces only Atria)
- DDD to DOO (Paces both ventricle and atrial with a fixed AV interval )
Purpose of magnet application .
Essentially it may be called as a safety mechanism to prevent external sensing in strong electrical fields in case the need arises.
Indirectly , it may aid us in detecting end of life of battery as well
During elctrocautery and related procedures application of magnet will help.
What is magnet rate* ?
- The moment you apply the magnet the pacing rate changes
- This is variable with each make and preset.
- End of life magnet rate will be different . It can be 65 to 85 fixed depend upon the make.
- Some pace makers fire initial magnet rates with 3-6 beat fast run and later revert to steady baseline rate.(One should not be confused )
* Always check with the pacemaker manual for the exact response.
When I put a magnet over nothing happened .What is the inference ?
- Magnet is not placed properly
- Pacemaker battery is totally dead.
- Very rarely some pacemakers have magnet function turned off
What happens during magnet application in ICD ?
- There is no change in ICD mode.
- All anti tachycardia functions are immediately suspended. (A major use in an unusual runaway inappropriate ICD shock situation )
Is there any risk of applying magnet ?
Since magnet removes the sensing function , interfering a cardiac rhythm which is dependent on sensing can be problematic.Similar situation arises in MRI scans and other magnetic fields.
Hence , application of magnet in a patient as a part of pacemaker trouble shooting who has no pacing spikes is rarely a problem While one should not do it without supervision of a learned cardiologist.
What is smart magnet ?
Each pacemaker and ICD is interrogated with the respective programmer.As such , there is no cross brand programmer available.This makes it difficult for patient( as well as physicians) to call for help in case of malfunction.
The solution is to make standard universal analyser and programmer .This requires cooperation between various stake holders.Meanwhile as temporary relief a magnet which can community two way with basic functional switches can be developed .
There is a need for universal smart magnet with constant interaction between device and magnet ..
Since , the generation next generation human heart is going to be wired and deviced in a complex manner, we need to know the basics about these issues.
Final message
Magnet application is akin to novice’s pacemaker analyzer. Every cardiac care unit must have one in their shelf. It aids us to diagnose over-sensing as a cause for pacemaker malfunction.(* please note , it has little role in all other pacemaker issues !) .In an emergency it can help stop inappropriate ICD shocks.(More importatnly It gives time to call an expert ! )
Reference
Posted in Cardiology - Electrophysiology -Pacemaker | Tagged asynchronous mode, magnet rate, pacemaker issue, problem of over sensing, use of magnet in pacemaker evaluation, vvi pacemker | Leave a Comment »
Distribution of Left main disease.
- Ostial
- Ostio-proximal (Within 1 cm of origin )
- Shaft -Discrete mid left main
- Shaft -Diffuse
- Isolated distal shaft( 1.0.0)
- Bifurcation ( Medina 1.1.0 -LAD)*
- Bifurcation (Median 1.1.0-LCX)
- Bifurcation ( Median 1.1.1)*
- Trifurcation ( With ramus )
* These three locations account for nearly 75% of all left main lesions.
We know atherosclerosis is a branch point disease .Normal left main measures 1 mm to 20mm.The shorter the left main lesser is the the incidence of LMD. Short left main can not engage the atherosclerosis much (No left main = No left main disease ) However ,very short left mains may increase ostial lesions .
- The commonest left main lesion is distal left main with one of the branch involvement (1.1.0.LAD is more common )
- Least common entity is discrete mid shaft lesion.
Simple strategy.
First dictum : All complex looking LMDs should be referred to a good surgeon.
Final dictum : Remember medical management for left main disease is still an accepted strategy in stable , non flow limiting situations .
Interventional Cardiologists feel they have the exclusive rights to indulge between these two spectrum of LMD .May be true! But extreme caution is required as we are playing our game in the most critical coronary high way .
Some suggestions and thoughts.
- 50 % diameter stenosis is significant. But significance does not mean we should tackle the lesion by aggression.
- Symptomatic flow limiting lesion only to be intervened . (Flow limiting means both angiographic and a stress test .FFR <.8 is also an index for flow limiting .Symptom means Angina on exertion )
- IVUS, OCT, FFR,NIR ,SYNTAX are not path breaking tools .They essentially add more glamor to left main disease than anything .
- Most bifurcation LMDs are managed by single stent with stent jailing the major side branch (Yes side branch can be LCX !)
- However ,two stent strategies is not banished .It can be vastly superior in some selected cases .(Especially with huge plaque load at carina )But needs expertise .
- In very small vessels two stent strategies are risky .
Reference (2012 update)
Posted in Cardiology -Interventional -PCI, Cardiology -unresolved questions, Left main disease | Tagged classification of left main disease, left main artery imaging, left main disease, medina classification, short vs long left main | Leave a Comment »
We know Nitroglycerine(NTG) as a most powerful epicardial coronary dilator . We use it for instant relief during episodes of coronary arterial spasm in cath lab.
What will happen if we administer NTG over a stented segment ?
Does it dilate it with same vigor ? What will be the consequence ?
A perfect setting for stent migration isn’t ?
Let us bust the myth around NTG . NTG rarely show visible coronary dilating effect except in the setting of coronary spasm .
Does a LAD with 3 mm diameter become 3.1 or 3.2 and so on with NTG ?
No .It won’t .It is my belief. It is well known , NTG’s action varies significantly in normal and diseased endothelium . Again , there is an irony .It seems , it can act only in normal endothelium , but we need require it’s therapeutic action only in pathological segments.Further any stented segment would contain clusters of both normal and abnormal endothelium .
One more inference is that, stented segment exerts constant pressure on intima making any pharmacological vasodilatation irrelevant .
Importance of radial strength of a stent
This issue of vaso-dilator induced stent migration may not arise in self expanding wall stent with high radial force.But we do not know how long these metals will carry this metallic property .Balloon delivered stents ( currently used 99% of times ) do not have permanent radial strength .
Final message
I am yet to comprehend what nitrates are expected to do (and what it really does ?) in a patient post PCI ? (By the way . . . why we need to prescribe Nitrates it in the first place ? but In real world most continue to take this for many reasons .)
We need to analyse the micro-vasomotion at the stent -coronary intimal interface.The dynamism in this narrow space can be critical , and may make the difference between life and death !
After thought .
In the hind sight, this post appears quixotic for myself . But some one , some where , may generate a great idea out of it , that will help our patients.
Posted in Cardiology -Mechnisms of disease, Cardiology -unresolved questions, Cardiology research topics, Infrequently asked questions in cardiology (iFAQs) | Tagged coronary spasm and ntg, epicardial coronary vasodilation, factors determining stent migration, nitrate action in normal and diseased endothelium, nitrate action in stented segment, nitric oxide and ntg action, nitroglycerine, stent coronary artery interface, stent dislodgement by ntg ?, stent migration | 1 Comment »
Today , November 2nd 2013 is Deepawali , Nearly 1 billion people celebrate it
Deepawali is an ancient festival of lights , millions of Hindus celebrate It with sanctity.
It is a war on darkness and ignorance .On this day goodness prevailed over evil (Asura)
Unfortunately , In the current versions , it would seem Asura’s also join Deepawali celebrations and enjoy it with more vigor ! which is supposed to eliminate them !
Please ensure , that doesn’t happen . . . at least in your domain !
God is supreme . . . he will never allow the evil to take over the world ! Be a soldier to God’s Army !
*For more about this great Hindu festival click on the Link here Deepawali
Posted in Quotes, Science and Religion, Venkat quotes | Tagged Deepawali, ethics in medicine, festival of lights, hippocrates | 1 Comment »
CAD is growing as an epidemic in most parts of the globe. It is a major determinant of health status of any country .Great strides in diagnostic, treatment modalities of CAD have been made in the last few decades. Still , the core principle of management of CAD resides in simple things like risk factor reduction / optimization , life style changes and few essential cardio-protective medications Aspirin, beta blockers and statins.
However , modern scientists have made a firm statement that knowing the coronary anatomy before starting the treatment is the only scientific approach . It is a huge assumption !
Is it practical ? or is it really required ?
CAD can be managed by means of medicines , interventions or surgery. Revascularisation is required only for those , who have critical , symptomatic lesions.
It is estimated , in only a fraction of CAD patients , we would require to know the anatomy . We have set criteria to choose patients for CAG , who are likely to have critical lesions.Physicians are trained for that elusive wisdom to choose such patients .Standard text books do mention clear-cut Indications for doing CAGs. Unfortunately , it is least respected and followed .
Cardiac physicians who would boast they can’t treat a CAD without knowing the coronary anatomy are clinically handicapped or poorly trained.
I am afraid such a class of cardiologists are rapidly breeding in the country side. They are encouraged to attend CME on clinical cardiology and basic principles of clinical decision-making .
We can’t keep on doing CAGs like ECG for every episode of angina . In fact treating CAD without knowing the anatomy remains (And it should be ) the dominant theme contemporary clinical practice . CAG is multi -edged sword
The most important side effect of routine coronary angiogram is , it ends up in infinite number of inappropriate interventions !
I think , we should pray in Hippocratic temples for sufficient wisdom to choose our patients. We can also learn it from Neurologists , they somehow manage most forms of cerebrovascular diseases (scientifically too ! ) without asking for angiogram of circle of Willis ! Mind you. . . brain is equally a vital organ !
Final message
It needn’t be a crime to treat CAD* without knowing the coronary anatomy. Rather . . . it would be so , to ask for CAG indiscriminately , in every episode of chest pain , without applying clinical sense !
* Emergencies included.
Posted in Cardiology -Interventional -PCI, cath lab tips and tricks, Infrequently asked questions in cardiology (iFAQs), Venkat quotes | Tagged acc/aha criteria for coronary angiogram, appropriate coronary angiogram, can we manage cad without coronary angiogram ?, cardiologist behaviour, coronary angiogram in chronic stable angina, ethics in cardiology, hippocrtes, inappropriate coronary angiogram, Indication for coronary angiogram, indications for coronary angiogram, waht is the indication for coronary angiogram ?, what is inappropriate coronary angiogram ?, when do you do coronary angiogram ? | Leave a Comment »
We expect LBBB in RV pacing . . .but if RBBB is recorded we are worried ! (Often times it may be neither LBBB nor RBBB )
Is it really a panic situation ?
- Not necessarily. The only issue is septal perforation .It is rare , can be recognised by echo or fluro .
- In true RV apical pacing with tined leads , RBBB is extremely uncommon .
- If the lead is fixed in the septum and para hisian area , there is definite possibility of deviation from typical LBBB pattern . Screwing leads that faces high septum or outflow , RBBB can be noted occasionally.
- The commonest cause for RBBB pattern in RV pacing , is due to screw tip going deeper into septal planes and activating the fibers of left bundle early .
- For LBBB pattern to occur right bundle should be morphologically intact .In diffuse CHB with bilateral bundle branch blocks the relative contribution ( Impulse conduction ) will determine the QRS morphology . If right bundle is more damaged than left bundle ,RBBB pattern may prevail even in the midst of RV pacing !
- In elderly men with sigmoid septum typical LBBBs are not observed.
- Anther plausible mechanism would be , even though RV is paced , the pacemaker current’s exit route may be from LV side .
- Finally , always think about coronary sinus pacing .It is extremely common in blind temporary pacing.
What should we do if we encounter RBBB morphology after PPM ?
- Analyse the ECG meticulosuly for capture or sensing failure .
- Do an echocardiography in RV inflow view.
- Screen the lead by fluroscopy
- Check the pacing parameters.
- Do a holter if you are really anxious .
If everything is fine , just forget the RBBB.Don’t split your hair for this apparent paradox. In medicine impossibilities will always galore !
This paper from Taiwan would vouch for this
Posted in Cardiology - Electrophysiology -Pacemaker, cardiology -ECG, Cardiology -unresolved questions, Infrequently asked questions in cardiology (iFAQs), Permanent pacemaker | Tagged lbbb and rbbb during pacing, mechansim of rbbb in rv pacing, RBBB during pacing, right bundle branch block during pacing, safe rbbb pacing, septal rvot pacing and rbbb in ecg | Leave a Comment »
We know LVH and SHT go together . Mind you , this is not an Intimate relationship.
Widespread utilisation of echocardiography has revealed , definite LVH occurs only in about 20% (A guess !) of HT . (Do you know in the Famingham study the incidence of LVH after 12 year follow up was a paltry 3 % .Will you agree with that ? Mind you , It was in 1969 when Echo was not there )
What determines LVH ? The clear answer is elusive. It is easy to escape from the issue by calling it multi factorial !
Why don’t you try this question .
My guess would be , magnitude ( or even duration of HT !) is less important than genetic predisposition or associated diabetes , renal involvement.Our analysis from hypertension clinic reveals LVH is many fold common in secondary HT when compared to primary HT !
I often used to provoke the students by saying if the LVH is gross in HT it can not be primary , 9/10 times ! Invariably we find some other association or reason for the HT !
Link to related topic in this site
Why-lvh-does-not-occur-in-all-patients-with-systemic-hypertension ?
How-diabetes-modifies-lvh-due-to-hypertension ?
Next . . .
How does LVH regress with treatment ?
Posted in Cardiology -Mechnisms of disease, Cardiology -unresolved questions, Clinical cardiology, Hypertension, Infrequently asked questions in cardiology (iFAQs) | Tagged determinants of lvh in hypertension, genetic factors in LVH, left ventricular hypertrophy, lvh, mechanism of lvh in hypertension, sht, systemic hypertension | Leave a Comment »
This post , is probably not meant for cardiology professionals.
Few technologies are clear winners in modern medicine. ICDs play games that would rival the God !
What is an ICD ?
Here is a man , who drops almost dead by a fatal cardiac arrhythmia . In few seconds ICD machine recognises this arrhythmia ,charges itself and fires a shock of about 30 joules direct current .The arrhythmia is reverted and the fellow gets up as if nothing has happened !
Watch this video
This revolutionary devices are to be used judiciously in individuals with high risk for dangerous cardiac arrhythmia.
The current indications as on 2012
- Nonischemic DCM EF ≤ 35% with documented VT
- Rarely other structural heart disease with recurrent risk for VT ( Few HCMs)
- Survivors of cardiac arrest due to VF without any completely reversible causes (Includes Brugada )
- Malignant forms of syncope with idiopathic recurrent VT /VF
- Congenital Long QT syndromes not amenable to beta blockers
Reference
Posted in Cardiology - Electrophysiology -Pacemaker, Cardiology -Interesting videos, Cardiology -Pacemakers and ICD | Tagged ICD, implantable cardiovertor defibrillator, Indications for ICD, live icd shock | Leave a Comment »













