Posted in bio ethics, cardiology-ethics, cath lab tips and tricks, medical quotes, Two line sermons in cardiology | Tagged abandoning cath lab procedure, cath lab complications, cath lab tips and tricks, ethics in cath lab, extraordianry interventional cardiologist, interventional cardiologist, invasive cardiologist, pci ptca, primary pci, who is interventional cardiologist | Leave a Comment »
Is “Non-flow limiting“ coronary lesions more prone for ACS ?
- If your answer is “No”, you can skip this article.
- If your answer is “Yes” , you need to read this article.
ACS is the commonest cardiac emergency .Thousands of patients are treated every day.Millions of dollars are spent.Bulk of the cardiologist’s life revolves around this entity.
Scattered atherosclerotic plaques in coronary artery lead to ACS either in a random fashion or in a predictable manner .
Still, we are highly uncertain about which lesions are likely to result in ACS ! Some time in the beginning of 21st century, the main stream cardiology media were abuzz with the concept, that non obstructive , non-flow limiting lesions are more prone for ACS rather than more tight stenosis.

I fail to understand how a tight lesion is less prone for ACS. Tighter lesions are bigger and must be prone for more complications . Image courtesy :http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/9/9a/Endo_dysfunction_Athero.PNG
This reasoning was based on few studies, that lacked solid scientific proof . In fact the initial observation was not made in living coronary arteries rather by autopsy observations .(Later live virtual histological studies came , but didn’t confirm this !)
Surprisingly the degree of anatomical narrowing was conferred vulnerability , when we know plaque compositions , morphology and hemo-rheological factors are many fold important in precipitating ACS . (Lipid content , fibrin cap thickness, eccentricity , etc)
So where is the truth hidden?
Is it really possible, lesser the stenosis more is the propensity for rupture ?
We need to introspect .
“In all probability, it is a meager statistical illusion”
For every tight lesion there are as many minor lesions scattered around in a given a coronary artery. These can progress into ACS later.
It is basically wrong to assume non-flow limiting lesions are more prone for ACS than non-flow limiting lesions.To believe so , seriously underestimates the culpability of big lesions .It appears a coronary mockery to me !
At best , we can conclude non-flow limiting lesions are not benign and can be an important source of ACS.
An unscientific chain reaction !
If we start believing non flow limiting (say 30% stenosis ) is more prone for ACS , why we are not stenting all those lesions ?
If the above concept is is applied in cath lab routinely , the principle of FFR which relies solely on hemodynamic impact will crash into the dustbin !
Some more truths
However , It is indeed true when a plaque is hardened by severe sclerotic process or calcification it is less prone for rupture and clinical ACS but can be a source for stable angina.
Is it justified to assume , larger the plaque the harder would be it’s content that resists ACS ?
Meanwhile , we also know there need not be any lesion at all to cause an ACS.( In a young smoker , 100 % thrombotic STEMI is possible over an area of coronary erosion caused by endothelial dysfunction ! So , where do we go from here !)
Let us be clear
Are you confused more ! . . . after reading this article, let us clear it by two-line summary !
As on 2014 ,
- Symptomatic flow limiting lesion are tackled by stents.
- All non-flow limiting lesions are treated by high dose Statins and vigorous medical management.
Final message
Contrary to popular perception, tight lesions are more complex, eccentric , soft and are at immediate risk of ACS.
Non flow limiting lesions remain static in most, regress in many , still carries distinct risk of progression into full blown ACS , at any time if conditions are favorable.
Fixed concepts and ideas in medical science do not help us taking medicine forward. Especially so, when these are based on assumptions and approximations. If only we redo these studies with the currently available technology (FFR/OCT/NIR the conclusions would be dramatically different. !
Waiting for someone to nullify such false concepts in a more scientific way !
Reference
2.Glagov S, Weisenberg E, Zarins C, Stankunavicius R, Kolletis G. Compensatory enlargement of human atherosclerotic coronary arteries. N Engl J Med. 1987; 316: 371–375.
3.Fuster V, Lewis A. Conner Memorial Lecture. Mechanisms leading to myocardial infarction: insights from studies of vascular biology. Circulation 1994;90:2126-2146.
4.Ambrose JA, Weinrauch M. Thrombosis in ischemic heart disease. Arch Int Med 1996;156:1382-1394
Retrospective angiographic studies and the prospective PROSPECT (Providing Regional Observations to Study Predictors of Events in the Coronary Tree) study have shown that plaques with severe stenosis carry a higher per-plaque risk for producing clinical events than plaques that cause no or non severe stenosis.
However, such lesions are few, and overall, most ACS are precipitated by plaques without significant stenosis on an antecedent angiography
weeks or months before. This epidemiology is consistent with the distribution of TCFAs, as shown by a combined angiography and optical coherence tomographic imaging study of nonculprit lesions.
Lesions that caused severe stenosis were twice as likely to be
TCFAs than lesions with only non severe stenosis, but the total number of TCFAs with nonsevere stenosis was three times higher than those with severe stenosis. The mild pre-existent stenosis of most TCFAs and ruptured plaques is explained by expansive remodeling, because such lesions are, on average, large.
The long-held notion that mild to moderate obstructive coronary lesions are responsible for the majority of MIs has been challenged by studies that described significant narrowing in the days preceding MI. However, significant narrowing shortly before MI may be a result of (rather than a precursor) for rupture.
Posted in Cardiology -Mechnisms of disease, Cardiology -unresolved questions, cardiology- coronary care, Pathology-Vulnerable plaque | Tagged acute coronary syndrome, fibrin cap, flow limiting vs non flow limiting lesions, ivus oct nir for plaques, lipid core, pathology of atherosclerosis, plaque erosion, plaque fissure, vulnerable plaque | Leave a Comment »
Many decades ago Potts shunt (Central Aortic -PA shunt)was used to increase pulmonary blood flow for severe RVOT obstruction mostly for TOF and tricuspid atresia .With the advent of ICR and Fontan role for central aorti shunts waned.
Now, read this
Chronic ,refractory pulmonary hypertension of any cause has dismal outcome.In patients with severe PAH many patients reach supra-systemic pressures . RV a volume handling chamber faces a uphill task of overcoming huge RV after load. As cardiac physicians , we struggle to perfuse the lungs in such situations.
The only option seems to be lung transplantation !
How to perfuse the lungs if the RV is failing ?
Is there any other alternative ?
Why not,use LV contractility to perfuse lungs .
Great Idea isn’t ? After all , how can we allow left ventricle known for it’s robust bumping function sit idle and relax when it’s counterpart is struggling with heavy load ?
How to use LV for increasing pulmonary blood flow ?
Create a central Aortic -Pulmonary shunt.
That’s resurgence of Potts shunt.
Dr Julie Blanc from France suggested this approach in in NEJM as a letter (Potts Shunt in Patients with Pulmonary Hypertension N Engl J Med 2004; 350:623) . It was a great Idea.
Since then lots of patients have a benefited from this vintage surgery.
Final message
A surgery blamed for early onset of pulmonary vascular damage due to potential Eisenmenger reaction is back .Indication for refractory Eisenmenger syndrome to perfuse lungs at very high pressure Nothing is obsolete in medical science .Nothing is ironical as well !
Another Innovation : Now Transcatheter Potts Surgery
Posted in cardiac surgery, cardiology -Therapeutics, cardiology congenital heart disese, cardiology innovation, Cardiology Innovations, pulmonary hypertension | Tagged a new avatar for potts shunt, percutaneous potts surgery for severe pah, Potts shunt for eisenmenger | Leave a Comment »
Cardiology as a filed has been the epitome of progress of medical science in the last century .Most research in cardiac science has grown and transformed with a definite clinical purpose.
The cardiac pharmacology has grown many fold and various drugs play a distinct role in relieving symptoms and prolonging life .
Which drug , do you think has the maximum impact in the clinical outcome and overall cardiovascular health of our population ?
My vote is for the old warrior . . . yes the the drug , which is used atleast a million times a month to unload the heart the meanly loop diuretic Frusemide ! Heparin came very close second !
Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged best cardiac drug, cardiac pharmacology, frusemide, frusemide heparin aspirin, greatest cardiology drug | Leave a Comment »
Today , we post cases for coronary angiogram , just like sending clients to breakfast table ! Close your eyes. Think for a moment. It is heartening to know how cardiac catheterization grew from a humble beginning . We know , Forssman , Cournand and Richardson who shared the Nobel price for Inventing cardiac catheterization in 1930s .
Soon after it’s invention it was criticized by most, few ridiculed it outright , few others wondered about it . One man from the iconic Grady memorial hospital , attached to Emory silently adopted this procedure and almost single-handedly did more than 1500 cardiac catheterization procedure. (Between 1940-50s)
How many of us know this man from Atlanta ,Georgia ?
Some times history appears unkind. He is Dr Steads . . . to be precise Dr.Eugene Anson Stead Jr. ( 1908, – 2005)

Born in a humble background in the suburbs of Atlanta , became a great medical teacher , researcher and educator . He is one of the founding fathers of cardiac catheterization . Defined it’s usage in clinical cardiology . The other major achievement was his strong conviction that medical science is indeed simple but made complicated by complex concepts .This thought transformed in him , as he found the concept of physician assistant . He believed focused medical knowledge in young and enthusiastic mind can make huge difference in the way medical knowledge is disseminated, applied and consumed .What a stunning truth even today !

The legacy of Grady continues which is one of the largest public hospital in USA with special affinity to poor and low-income population.
The lab which Dr Stead worked was later taken over by Dr Noble O Fowler* , another great cardiac physician continued the research and wrote the famous book on cardiac diagnosis and treatment.( * I think it should be in early 1950s when Dr Stead left for Dukes)
Final message
Invention of a concept is one thing . Accepting it , trying it , improving it , disseminating it , is an equally important contribution to science. Dr Stead did exactly that .He remained a positive force in propagation of medical knowledge, made it available for those people who need it .
He passed away on June 12, 2005 at the age of 96 leaving behind a huge legacy .It will be an error if we don’t teach our young students history of such great men , in medical schools today !
Posted in Cardiology classics, Cardiology-Land mark studies, cath lab tips and tricks, Great Men in cardiology, history of cardiology, Land mark articles in cardiology, Uncategorized | Tagged concept of physician assistant, dr stead eugene anson, father of physician assistant, grady memorial hospital atlanta georgia, history of cardiac cathetrisation, right heart catheterisation | 1 Comment »
Cullotte is a trouser worn by 18th century French aristocrats.Now,in 21st century French interventional cardiologists found a striking similarity of cullotte with two stent strategy in bifurcation lesion .
Though this technique is in vogue for more than a decade , it has not been popular due to perceived complexity .
It is making a come back in recent years , as we begin to negotiate bifurcation lesions with better expertise and hardware.
7 steps in Culotte technique (From NORDIC study )
-
Wiring both main and side branch .
-
Pre-dilatation of main branch and/or side branch,( Optional)
-
Stenting of main branch
-
Rewiring side branch through main branch stent strut,
-
Stenting of side branch through main branch stent,(Now main branch is jailed by side branch stent
-
Recross main branch through struts of SB.
-
Procedure completed with final kissing balloon dilatation
Reference
Posted in Cardiology -Therapeutic dilemma, Cardiology -unresolved questions, cath lab tips and tricks, PCI PTCA Hardware | Tagged approach to bifurcation lesion, carinal stabilisation in bifurcation, cath alb animation, complex ptca with two stents, culotte technique for bifurction stenting, final kissing balloon technique, french cullotte, main branch jailing during cullotte, plaque shift cullotte, proximal optimisation technique pots ptca, ptca culotte vs crush, side branch optimisation, stent animation ptca, tips and tricks in pci, two stetn strategy for bifurcation lesion | Leave a Comment »
Note :This is a copy of my earlier blog on coronary micro-circulation published few years ago.Recently this got numerous hits .Hence I have just reposted it with slight modification.
Human coronary circulation stands unique among others as it is a life-sustaining circulation.It is indeed a great medical achievement to visualise the right and left coronary artery system by coronary angiogram. Actually, what we see is only a fraction of the surface area of coronary circulation .The surface area of epicardial coronary arteries constitutes less than 5 % of entire coronary vascular tree .
And . . .

An in vitro heart with special catheters showing the true extent of coronary circulation: Courtesy http://eurheartj.oxfordjournals.org/content/28/3/278.full.pdf+html
This is the reason normal coronary angiogram can never mean normal coronary circulation !
This huge gap in our perception is the single important factor that explains the vagaries of modern coronary care .
This also make any clinical coronary scenario a reality .
“A patient with normal coronary angiogram getting a myocardial infarction , the next day and a severe triple vessel disease living comfortably for decades with medical management”
So , it is essentially a false sense of scientific accomplishment by the cardiac scientists at least in the of coronary circulatory physiology.
What determines the extent of these invisible coronary micro circulation ?
There are innumerable channels of micro vessels traversing across the heart, sharing , bridging , branching, penetrating and perfusing the muscle mass.They can be anatomically patent , physiologically non patent .They can be recruited by hemodynamic stress .These are never visualized by current imaging modalities..It is also influenzed by favorable growth milieu and hormonal and neural stimuli.
Ignorance based cardiology
What is the mechanism of primary VF following acute STEMI ?
The quantum of coronary micro circulation is like the vast cerebral neuronal net work .We have every reasons to believe they are have unique genetic imprint.How else you can explain a man with full blown STEMI come 24 hours later comfortably to the OPD while another loses his life with a stormy primary VF before even boarding the ambulance !
Why many cardiologists do not give due credit the coronary collateral circulation ?
Right from the days of Levine in 1970s( Who made a seminal contribution about coronary collateral) the utility value of coronary collateral circulation was never able to convince the cardiology professionals .
It has been our traditional teaching ( without much evidence of course !) coronary collateral circulation is not effective to support blood flow during exercise . This fact has been disproved many times . Coronary collateral circulation was indeed useful in limiting damage in ACS and relieve symptoms in stable angina.It helps in reverse remodeling and provided electrical stabilty as well in post MI population.
Still , the concept was alienated and made totally irrelevant in the interventional era . Many cardiologists found well-developed collateral’s as an interference to their expertise and ego since it has a potential to alter the indication of PCI.They continue to have strong scientific conviction (Pseudo ?) that man made collaterals must always been superior to God made collaterals !
Whenever some credible reports emerge about collateral circulation being equivalent to revascularisation procedure , these concepts were prematurely buried for some reason.
In the last decade there was a concern about performing PCI in patients with well-developed collaterals .The argument was , they tend to develop early stent occlusion and restenosis . It was a genuine query raised by few thought leaders in the field as collateralised vessels suffer from low flow after PCI , if the pre -existing collateral continue to function.
But then , few studies countered this , and PCI was shown to be safe and in fact may fare well in patients with extensive collaterals .
In these studies interventionist’s argument looked amusing ! as they seem to define a successful PCI as not only to open the occluded vessel but also make sure to close all functioning collaterals .(What a a pity for our natural biological angiogenic forces which had worked and grown meticulously for months!)
Cardiac science in the current format, makes the future look bleak for coronary a collateral circulation .With early PCI becoming a norm we will never ever allow the natural collaterals to grow , and even the established collaterals will have to face a stiff fight for survival with sophisticated coronary interventions .
Competing interest in the filed of coronary collateral research
While the basic scientists want to grow collaterals with angiogenesis , stem cells etc interventionists continue to indulge in rampant angioplasties which will suppress collateral growth.
This implies we will struggle to establish the true importance of coronary collateral circulation .
Final message
Can it be an effective form of revascularisation ?
My personal inference is coronary collateral circulation “would and should” have a definite role in at- least some of the subsets with chronic coronary syndromes. If we think otherwise . . . it’s against the principle of natural biological science .
A good collateral system with optimal medical management can save not only our patient’s lives but also their hard earned currencies !
Reference
Here is a rare article in European heart journal that discuses coronary collateral circulation . Let us welcome such wonderful reviews which keep the interest alive on the filed.
http://eurheartj.oxfordjournals.org/content/28/3/278.full.pdf+html
Posted in cardaic physiology, cardiac physiology, Cardiology -Coronary collateral circulation, Cardiology quotes | Tagged coronary angiogram, coronary blindness, coronary collateral circulation, coronary micro circulation | Leave a Comment »
* Currently it is better to use only two terms .Epicardial fat and thoracic fat .Other terminology should be avoided.
- Echo
- Multi-slice CT Scan
- MRI
Which part of cardiac cycle it is measured ?
Since epicardial fat is a compressible structure , in diastole the myocardial mass encroaches the epicardium any imaging modality the distinction between epicardial and para-cardiac fat tends to attenuated.
Even MRI images obtained with diastolic gating , may not be reliable .End systolic frames are now considered ideal.
(J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011 Oct 4;58(15):1640;Distinction of “fat around the heart”.Kaushik M, Reddy YM.)
What is the normal epi-cardial fat volume ?
There is no standard normal.In one large study from Boston in people with a BMI between 25-30 the mean epi-cardial fat volume was 125 cubic cms
(*Intrathoraic fat same as para-cardiac fat located outside parietal pericardium )
How to differentiate fat from pericardial fluid ?
It can be a very difficult issue especially when you expect both as in hypothyroidism .It needs proper gain settings and interpretation.
Here is case report of how epicardial fat was mistken for PE even in TEE
Can we measure the net mass of cardiac fat , does it compress the heart ?
When we say average heart weighs 300 grams it includes fat embedded in it. I don’t think it is possible to measure the fat mass ,but clinically it may be important.Read this .Can-epicardial-fat-constrict-the-heart-an-authentic-yes-from-ulsan-korea ?
Final message
Estimation of epicardial fat volume is largely a research tool.In grossly obese patients it may have some clinical utility.Increased anterior fat pad in routine 2D echo is an useful screening test. However, it requires MRI/CT imaging for accurate quantification.
References
Posted in Cardiac MRI, cardiac radiology | Tagged end systolic epicardial fat, Epicardial fat thickness, how to measure epicardial fat ?, para cardiac fat, paracardiac fat, pericardial fat, pericardial fat vs pleural effusion | Leave a Comment »
CHB with CAD is a common combination especially in the elderly.
Which will you Intervene first ? Is the AV block related to CAD ?
How to differentiate Ischemic from degenerative AV block ?
Differentiating is often difficult.Even coronary angiogram may not answer the query unless it is totally normal . For AV block to occur usually LCX / RCA lesion is required. LAD lesion in isolation are rare to cause CHB .
How often re-vascularisation reverses ischemic CHB ?
Logically you expect more reversals.In real world it rarely happens.
Therapeutic options in combined CAD and CHB
- PCI and pace maker in the same sitting .
- PCI first followed by pace-maker at a later date.
- Pace maker first followed by PCI at a later date if required.
- CABG and epicardial pacemaker ( best option In all critical TVD and CHB)
- Pace maker followed by CABG later
- Pacemaker followed by medical management (CHB with Insignificant CAD)
Can worsening of ischemia occur after pacemaker ?
Very much possible . Since the patient has been benefited by low heart rate in terms of MVO2 consumption .(Inserting a pacemaker is like sudden withdrawal of beta blocker !)
Rate adoptive pacing can confer chronotropic competence which may bring back the angina.So,what was a insignificant lesion can become hemodynamicaly relevant and may require angioplasty later.
*The above clinical issue is applicable for sinus node dysfunction and CAD as well.
Final message
There is no fixed rule in the management strategy in combined CHB and CAD .
Generally , electrical therapy should be given preference .Symptom guided approach may be practical.
In this scientific era , one may argue to deal both issues together by simultaneous PCI and pacemaker , still option 3 and 6 remain clear favorites !
If angina occurs even in baseline bradycardia it is obvious the obstructive CAD is significant and needs immediate fixing .
Finally , though it looks an attractive concept , It is very rare for CHB to get reverted by PCI or CABG.
Posted in cardiology -ECG, Cardiology -guidelines, Infrequently asked questions in cardiology (iFAQs) | Tagged chb and double vessel disease, complete heart block and triple vessel disease, how to manage sinus node dysfunction and cad ?, sick sinus syndrome and cad, sss and cad, SSS AND CHB | 6 Comments »















