Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for the ‘cardiology-ethics’ Category


In one of the corporate hospitals  which I visited in my city(Chennai*)  ,  happened  to see a nurse taking blood sample from a patient  who has been  just admitted  in a Hi-tech coronary care unit for UA-NSTEMI.

It included blood tests for CRPs,homocysteine,Apo-lioprpitein B etc . She was  being supervised   by  a capitation fee fed  , just delivered  , neo- medical graduate from a country side medical college.

I asked  her  what for you’r doing these  tests.

                        She said ,  it is  to detect risk of developing CAD.

     . . .I  reminded her , the patient  had already developed full blown CAD .

She was too innocent  to say  ” I do not know all those  things sir ,  my consultant asked  me to do it !

This is how  some corporate coronary unit* functions and   handle their  prized  possession . And every one enjoys it , as science  prevails over common sense !

* Shall  I  name the hospital  ?   . . . No , it would invite trouble  . . . oh ,  what  a  freedom of expression we enjoy  !

Read Full Post »

                                                                                 Image courtesey : Jupeter Images

This  is because  . . .

  1. Doctors live in a  false life of pseudo- perfectionism . “I can never err”  attitude .
  2. Ego !  Their  pride at stake !
  3. Accepting a mistake would affect their further client-age
  4. Feels humiliated  among their colleagues and peers
  5. We are ready to accept  our mistakes in public  but the society  is  not  yet ready to forgive  us . So we hide !

Answer

Though  all the above  contributes for this behavior . It is the  response 2   that plays havoc on patient care !

Discussion

It is a well-known fact millions of medical  mistakes happen every  year  across the globe .Most of them are  committed  by  medical professionals and equal number of them result from untoward  effects of   drugs,     complications  of procedures and  surgeries.

Apart  from  these ,  laboratory errors in   reporting  and interpreting  diagnostic tests   happen  on hour to hour basis in any hospital . Many of them could  have  serious  implication  in patient outcome .   Though doctors  do  periodic auditing the  incidence continue to  galore  and there is very little data  to suggest  the overall  incidence has reduced  in any  significant fashion .

In many sense doctors  do share  some similarities   with  drugs and devices  . Like the ubiquitous  drugs  and devices , diagnostic tests, ,  doctors too cause side effects  by their action or inaction . It  is referred to as ,  undesired  response, complications, error in judgement , negligence , ignorance  etc ( Read a related article in my site)

Like the famous quote of  ( Osler I think )

A drug  which  causes  no side effect will not have the desired effect as well  . . .  a doctor  who has not  caused any injury to their   patients   can  never be  considered as  an  accomplished  doctor !

Drugs like  statin which is supposed to reduce cholesterol  in blood  misbehaves  with  liver and can even result in fatality .We accept it .The matter ends  with a   FDA box   warning .

If a ventilator crashes due to a soft ware problem ,  we accept it . We can boldly admit medical  errors  if it is a  fault of a drug or machine.  But , errors by doctors are rarely pardoned ! So it is natural they are  swept under the carpet.

When  doctors do  delicate  cardiac surgeries ,  it takes only  a  fractional  loss of concentration   to cut  the aorta and that could cause serious after effects .

These can be called as errors, mistakes or  negligence in whichever way you like to call it. The problem is ,  these minor events  (Which   occur in thousands every day ) are not recorded,  logged , or disseminated  to our patients . Even medical law makers and judiciary is blinded to most of thing that happen inside the medical institutions.

So , the world will never  know the reality .When we want transparency in all walks of life ,   we should at least  fight for  a minimum  transparency  from doctors.(Why cant  they conduct the   customary internal auditory meeting in the public domain !)

If only doctors admit their mistakes with courage medical  profession will get more respect .Living behind  veils never  liberates . This  traditional suppression of    facts  make  the  medical  professionals   high risk for guilt when  truths unfolds .There is one  Tamil proverb which says  A half  doctor  is the one who has  killed  at-least   1000 patients . Still ,  a  minuscule of doctors  are ready to accept their mistakes   .(Especially  to their patients and their relatives  , though they admit in private !)

Final message

  • Implementing transparent medical care , right to information , informed  consent  etc all  demand  honesty. To be precise  . . . extreme honesty ! Ego and honesty are rare companions .
  • How many times we blame it on the disease  and  hide behind the technicalities   for our mistakes and errors.
  • Can  any doctor accept  an  error that occurs  during a surgery or a procedure that  causes  death and  request a  pardon  from patient’s relatives .  I  suspect ,  if there is  such a breed among  doctors   . . . I am sure  he will be branded as  a lunatic by their colleagues !

Coming soon

  • Consequence of  doctors  not accepting errors  !
  • Errors in medical data base and literature.
  • Imperfect  science . Another important aspect of medical error is attributible  to the  vagaries of  science itself. What looks as a perfect modality suddenly becomes  , not only  obsolete but also dangerous . If  a surgeon does a  gastro jejenostomy for  acid peptic disease today ,  his  license  is at risk of  being clipped ,   the same  surgery was a  privilege few decades ago. This aspect  deserves  special debate .

Read Full Post »

It is heartening to read a series of open page articles in the India’s  national news paper  recently  which  started a  lovely debate about how the medical profession and doctor’s behavior is being perceived in this country . It all began  with this article by Dr Araveethi with   serious criticism  of the ways  and means  ,  by which doctors  indulge in  forbidden unethical acts . (mainly involving  financial  benefits ) Click on the Image to read the article.(Hope it works)

.

While most agreed with his observation  surprisingly one  response by Dr. Manoramma Gadde  tried to justify it !  promptly  evoked strong reactions for and against.

And this   response from  Dr .A.R Antony  to  Dr Manorama Gadde   CAME A WEEK LATER  seemed a  best one. Read for yourself

I  enjoyed  the  entire article by Dr Antony ,   especially when he observes  ethical doctors are a rare breed and even   be a laughing  stock among their colleagues. This is very much true  but as he rightly points out ,  the majority  of goodness should prevail over the minority of evil . ( Let us hope it is not vice versa ,   as  evidence  is mounting  against this assumption  )

What is the role of modern science in  making medical  profession into a  self less service to  service only for self ?

Read  on this article   : Truths when silent are not heard in consultation rooms

Is there acceptable level of unethical   acts  for doctors  ?

100 %   perfection  is never  possible  in any field .

Like permissible carbon levels in environment and permissible  contaminant in tinned  foods  one can suggest  doctors can  also be allowed a quantum of  immorality ! (This is akin to making corruption legal  still the  ultimate aim  is  to control it ) .Probably this is what Dr Manorama tried to convey in his article  !

What is the patients role in the perpetuation  of un-ethicalness  of doctors ?

A patient with  half-baked ( internet  fed ) medical knowledge  asking for various tests   is quiet common phenomenon .  This is termed as pressure prescription . Patient  interference in medical  decision-making and doctors yielding to it is also a rampant phenomenon. Empowering patients beyond a level is unreasonable or not a desired goal.

Why  doctors  continue to be noble   but many hospitals are not  !  How is this possible ?

We have willfully  accepted  medical care  to  become an industry  .When corporate hospitals are listed in stock exchange what do you expect of them  ?  I do not know  how  the current generation of  prepaid medical professionals manufactured   from various  medical  education  factories  in our country side  will behave  . It is them , who are  running these dubious   hospitals and nursing homes . In my observation a genuine and meritorious  medical student is  never  interested in starting a  hospital or nursing home .   He lacks both the business sense and also the  resources . Hence  he  or she  often becomes an employee  of  a hospital  or institution  run   by  capitation fee fed neo- medical  graduates  with  Dalal street mentality.

Counter point

There are thousands of doctors especially in  primary health centres  and emergency wards  working round the clock  in all those ill equipped  poorly staffed  Govt hospitals trying to save lives desperately  .  Similarly  many private practitioners sitting in the remote towns and villages  spending their precious  evening   caring for the sick.

So , the problem lies  mainly in  the  proliferation of  pseudo  – modern medical science  in an unregulated fashion  mushrooming into the urban and semi urban areas .

Solution ?

Never believe the private sector in the present form (*Total chaos)   will provide an inclusive health care  to our population. The recent WHO statistics say India is the only country where  permanent assets like houses ,  livestock are sold by people to get a  seemingly  modern and scientific  health  care .(Poor villagers are  asked to spend their entire monthly salary to  do a costly PCR test (Now proved useless)  to diagnose a AFB positive open tuberculosis  !)

The  current model of health care  in most developing countries   especially India  , which  our corporates are actively pursuing  is counter productive for both rich and poor.

A rich old  man is simply not allowed to die a natural death  without spending a chunk of his accumulated wealth ,  while a young , active   poor  men of our country  die for want of  those  same facilities which goes futile  those dying elite bodies !

*Let me drift  to a  different topic .  The private sector health care is totally disorganized , lies in  complete chaos though  enriched with infrastructure and other resources. What they lack is the terrible common sense. While the Govt sector has  a organised administrative and functional model   with huge expertise  which lies mostly dysfunctional due to various  reasons. Which is causing more danger to society ?   The answer is tough one  It would a  close race between  hyperfunctional private sector  or dysfunctional  Govt Sector .

I dream a day when these private sectors  take over the  Govt hospitals  and vice versa so that both can  complement the best between them.

Final message

Most doctors are really  noble  in their thinking. In  few  ,their action may occasionally touch  the lines of immorality .( The definition of immorality or unprofessional acts are  often reset according to our convenience  ) .

Even if a conscious doctor wants to do  genuine  work in the existing system , he is  rarely allowed to pursue it .  So ,  in   the current situation  most doctors are at risk  of  tasting the bad fruit  every day with or without  their knowledge.

The doctrine of   hospitals  lack  ethical code , while  it is expected  from  individual doctors   is the single important factor that is responsible for the present chaos in medical care delivery

 So in my final analysis  I agree with many of the arguments on  both sides  .Even though  ethical doctors are available they are in a very short supply  . We need much ,  much more  . . .   I am afraid  the future looks bleak !  . . .  with humble excuses to all optimists out there.

What is  your  take on this issue ?

Read Full Post »

“Limitations of a study”   column appear in scientific articles  because . . .

  1. It  offers   lame excuses
  2. It  informs us  ,  not to get  fooled by  their  finding  .It could  be terribly wrong
  3. The editors won’t publish the paper  without this customary paragraph!
  4. Judge yourself . . . we are transparent !
  5. No study is 100% perfect . Just to make sure the readers are aware of it.

I fail to understand , why even  good articles are rejected for minor  errors  in methodology by many   journals.

Meanwhile ,  how on this earth it’ s  possible  ?   for  some articles to  appear in  top journals ( with questionable conclusions )  embellished
with   major errors in methodology ,  but has  a proud declaration and confession about the  flaws  of the study  in the “Limitations of study” column !

So , in this  modern scientific world  ,  it suggests to me ,  one can  can write whatever  you think as science , as long as  you  declare it and able to impress the editors  to  shift the errors into  limitations column ,  you  are likely to be excused  and also  rewarded !

Read Full Post »

There was a time  , even  cardiac catheterisation was contraindicated if the aortic valve  is  significantly calcified. LV angiogram was judiciously  avoided in all such patients . Why ? A significant increase in disabling strokes were witnessed .Those were the time  a sense of  fear (common sense ?)   prevailed . Every one was following this dictum with sanctity .

Now in 2010 .TAVI has  arrived with great fanfare . We not only cross the calcific valve , we literally play  a violent contact sport   in the aortic root  for over two hours with all sorts of pushes  and passes  on  a  fragile valve.And  we are happy to  claim that  stroke rate is comparable to aortic valve surgery and TAVI is not-inferior to AVR in high risk surgeries .

How is this possible ? As the times  changed ?  Is it true , our stroke  fears are just imaginations  or have we lost our  faculty of  reasoning and  sense ? (Will it be logical to  fund a research  if someone claims a  surgical  technique  to replace  aortic valve in  a beating heart without aortic cross clamping !)

Data shows  even if  distal protection devices are  used the stroke rates  can reach to  objectionable levels .It remained  a mystery ,  at least to me how no body was  questioning this ? I was happy to find this editorial in NEJM which  just stopped  short  of   banishing  this modality in its current form.

http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMe1103978

What price it asks ?  and leaves the readers to guess  the answer ? NEJM wants to be too decent and polite , but in science politeness is generally not required  ,  as long as  your  observations are  correct !

For all those enthusiastic  interventional cardiologists  here is  a positive message .

Nothing comes easy in science.Great  inventions do have problems  initially .  Without  major hurdles  there can be no progress ! It is  because of   you  modern cardiology is making giant strides . Remember  the early days of angioplasty , early days of pacemaker  .  But  please realise  the most important issue  is ,  whatever  we   innovate or discover it  should be shown   superior to the  best  existing modality in all aspects(Technique,  procedural  complications, long term  outcome ,costs, side effects etc  ) .It is awful  to note   new drugs or devices  are  rarely compared with  the best treatment that is currently available .

A  new  treatment that simply  complements  or proves  non-inferiority  can never be considered an invention. How can we   portray radio frequency  renal denervation (  a complex  lab procedure ) for controlling blood pressure   as a great innovation for man kind  while we  have   so many drugs and  modalities  available  at a fraction of the cost  with  little  consequence .

Reference

http://www.escardio.org/congresses/esc-2009/news/Pages/Transcatheter-Aortic-Valve-Implantation.aspx

Read Full Post »

Most important MCQ in clinical cardiology

Many cardiologists  would love to do away with detailed  clinical examination because  . . .

  1. They think it is an inferior job to do  . By skipping  it , they get a false sense of superiority.
  2. It is a time killer  and eat into precious cath-lab  time
  3. They no longer believe in  these “perceived – primitive” medical methods.
  4. Fear of colleagues making  fun of hem if they  indulge  in detailed clinical examination.( At-least in India ! )
  5. To give more job opportunities  to para medics.
  6. They are no longer confident about making a good clinical examination as they  are neither  trained  adequately nor interested in it !

Answer :  All of the above can be true .  The 6th response is  likely to be  more  correct !

While cath labs can prevent few deaths occasionally . . . it is the general wards and OPDs that add life every day

Read Full Post »

One of the greatest medical sermon of our times  is   “Doctors must   constantly update their knowledge , Continuing medical  education is as sacred as their profession  !  If you are not updating your knowledge you cease to a doctor “

It is fashionable , but true  to state  modern medicine lacks humane  care . Modern medicine  is  challenged by a huge  technological ,  commercial  onslaught  where common sense takes  the back seat

Hence , doctors need to renew not only  their  academic competence   but also  their ethical  fitness  every  year !

Aggression  could be the other  name for  modern medical care . For every  new  invention , treatment   or guideline that  is  approved  an equal number  is shelved after few months or years  for safety reasons.

Bulk of  medical updates  for  current age physicians  is nothing , but asking   them to forget  all those wrong things that has been meticulously uploaded in their brains in the recent past  ( Recall the classical story of drug eluting stents )

If this is the  case . . . then  . . .  what for  we  are  updating ?   and  for what  we are  learning and forgetting  ?  and  . . . how frequent we need to forget ?  Of course  , there is a big chunk of   human tribe  who  can never master the art of forgetting ! Some mistakes are permanently etched in their terra byte hard disks .

Is there a place  for backdating and discontinuing  medical  education  ?

What  man- kind needs  at times of  medical  crisis  ,  is  not  the current  treatment  but the correct  treatment    .It is our duty  to  find  all those  trustworthy  drugs  & treatment modalities  that were  sent  to  the gallows by the modern medical forces   for various reasons !

If  some of  the gems in  medicine are  left behind in  past  “time domain”  ,  it is  mandatory  for us  to go  back in time and   catch it , adopt it and disseminate it !

Further ,  whenever  the  hyped   “medical updating sessions ”  turns out to be  synonymous with adding nonsense (It is  becoming all too common these days   !) we should resist   it by all means !

For many . . . Hippocrates and his medicine sounds dirty now !

If  only we back-date  our knowledge   .  .  .

Todays  youngsters  can learn a secret that liver enlargement can be diagnosed easily  with their  hands ,  without  waiting for a  CT scan report !

If only we back-date  our   knowledge  . . .

We can realise  Aminophylline can save so many  lives of cardiac  failure  , which  our newer inotropic agents are struggling to accomplish .

If only we  back- date  our knowledge  . . .

We can calmly manage  acute MI with lignocaine  even in a country side  .  Amiodarone unfairly replaced  this  efficient  anti  VT  molecule  for no academic reasons !

If only we back- dat our knowledge  . . .

We  can  advice simple non pharmacological intervention for  stage 1 HT   than prescribing the  glamorous  sartan molecules  form a  multinational  ARB shoppe.

If only we back- date our knowledge  . . .

We can  promptly recognise  cardiac failure  without  ordering  for the error prone   BNP . Back dating also  helps us to under stand  that post infarct angina is a  glaring sign  for presence of   viable myocardium  and prevent us from undertaking a  2000 $ PET  excursion !

If only we back- date our knowledge  . . .

We can  send  all our uncomplicated , asymptomatic   STEMI  patients ( in class 1 )  straight to  their  home rather than to cath lab  play grounds !

Read Full Post »

We  are at the mercy  of  the three major coronary arteries (LAD,LCX,RCA) that sustain our life . Their  job is clear cut  .It has to perfuse   about 300 Grams of   live bundle of energy  for  an average of 6-7 decades.

What are the hurdles it  faces ,  how it overcomes these obstacles  forms the fascinating story of   “survival  of  human heart”

When coronary blood supply is confronted with a sudden compromise  as in ACS  ,  often the heart has little  time to respond . Hence the damage  and risk of death is  more. Even here there are lots of safety mechanisms and natural lytic process that limit the loss of life to less than 30 %  of all STEMIs. This implies nature protects against the death in 70 % of individuals and help  them  to reach hospital.*

*Among those  who reach hospital , we  the cardiologists  try to reduce the  mortality to about 6-7 % (20% without treatment ) with all  those hi-tech gadgets .It is a  different story and will be addressed elsewhere .

When it comes to  chronic insults ,  the heart has a unique potential to  stage  long haul battles. It has many tricks  under its  sleeves when challenged in a slow fashion.

The main weapons are two

1. Coronary collateral circulation.

2. Ischemic preconditioning.

Here is a patient who fights his life even after all his  three coronary arteries   totally blocked and surviving with one of the branches of left main -Ramus intermedius .

If you have thought his RCA was the savior  you are  mistaken  .

To every one’s   surprise  his  RCA was awful  as well !

He had angina which was  troublesome  but manageable .Was able to live a life with acceptable standards (Indian standard )  After the angiogram he  received  CABG.  A turbulent post operative course ensued  due to various reasons . He  struggled but   fully recovered  . . .  and  ultimately  reached the  previous  standard  of life !

Final message

Modern cardiology is all about not trusting  powers of nature .

But youngsters should realise the enormous potential of those invisible powers.It may sound philosophical , but please  remember  . . .after all . . .  philosophy  is nothing but  search for truths. Atleast believe in them  once in a while !

Read Full Post »

Nothing in this world is black and white. In fact,  most events are in between . The irony is , our brain  always wants to view  things in two distinct entities !

  • Success or failure
  • Beautiful or ugly
  • Good or bad
  • Win or lose,
  • Rich and poor etc . . . etc

So it is no  surprise !  cardiologists  also travel in the same boat !

They classified  the events after thrombolysis   into two dogmatic categories . Successful  thrombolysis or failed thrombolysis   . . .  as if no other event  can occur in between .

Traditionally 50% regression of ST segment is called successful .   What  about 30%  and 40 % ST regression ?

Further , there is an important caveat  in the timing,  as we  traditionally assess ,  90 minutes of thrombolysis .

Consider the following  situation  :

  1. Thrombolysis  is failed at 90 minutes, but  succeeds  at 120/180  minutes ?
  2. Is 50 % ST regression at 180 minutes is as bad  or as good as 25 % regression at 90 minutes ?
  3. How to label a patient who  is extremely comfortable in spite of ECG criteria of failed thrombolysis ?(Surprisingly this situation is fairly common !)

So, without finding answers to some critical questions , we have defined the success  of thrombolysis with  half baked data .

This is exactly , is the reason we  are unable to do a  valid  study on failed thrombolysis, rescue PCI etc .  We know the results of rescue PCI  ,  always  been  contradictory to the general logic !

It is estimated a substantial number of  STEMI patients following   thrombolysis   fall into a category of partially successful thrombolysis implying partial restoration of blood flow and salvage. The correct definition for  successful thrombolysis and reperfusion should be at the myocardial mass level , and  not at the level of coronary artery.The ECG  is the best available indicator.

Implication for having a  poor definition  of  failed thrombolysis

It is not a rare sight to wheel  in , a patient to a cath lab  with label of failed thrombolysis dangling in his neck  who is clinically  stable  (Has a less than required 50%  ST regression , but a definite, favorable trend with a 30 % ST regression  at 90 minutes  )

How many cardiologists will be willing to abort a CAG/PCI  , as a repeat ECG just  before puncturing  in the  cath lab reveals    successful  thrombolysis ? (little  delayed though !)

If only we have better methods to risk stratify patients following thrombolysis , we can avoid

  • Huge costs incurred
  • Expected and unexpected hazards of doing an emergency  intervention in an adequately salvaged STEMI
  • Hundreds of cardiology man hours can be saved  for better purposes .

Final message

Classifying thrombolyis into  success  or  failure  is a  skewed  way of looking  at this important  issue .

It is an irony ,  cardiologists often  triage LV dysfunction , valve disease , cardiac failure  etc  into 4  grades (  minimal  , mild , moderate or severe  ) . It is  still a mystery ,  why thrombolysis  is never graded  like that ,  and it is always considered as  all or none phenomenon !

There is a substantial number of patients  with partially successful ( or shall we call partially failed !) thrombolyis  .This group must be given adequate attention or inattention  . There  is a urgent need for a through review of how we look at  the post thrombolysis status  . It is better to use the newer imaging modalities like PET/MRI more  liberally to identify  exact sub group  of failed thrombolysis who will benefit form revascularisation .

Read Full Post »

Medical profession is the noblest of all !  . Doctors are akin to God in  many ways  ! They  have the potential  to remove the  sufferings of  mankind  . These are the often made  quotes about doctors   for  many centuries. Today’s medical professionals are ,  a  strained   lot  to fulfil their role expected of them .They have to maintain the social identity and earn enough to sustain their image in society. The onslaught of commercial and pseudo-scientific concepts have ruined the profession considerably.

Those were the days when the family physician  concept was flourishing , where in  a doctor was taking care of entire family. This  concept has  taken a different avatar now .

Now a doctor feels , once the patient is seen by him becomes his/her  patient rather a property! This perception has grown in a malignant manner , many doctors do not refer to a specialist even in deserving cases  fearing patient poaching .

This  possessiveness  of doctors about their patients leads to many  of the  unethical behavior .

My case . . .my patient . . .   my fees , . . .this sort of approach though appeared  good in the past ,  is rapidly becoming a liability for the patients  .Lack of organised health  care   by private and Government sector also amplifies the issue .It is pathetic to note         ,  at least Govt hospitals have some accountability ,  majority of private health systems  do not have  mortality or morbidity auditing . 

The my patient, my property  doctrine is playing havoc in medical health delivery system  .The following are the situations where a patient genuinely suffer due to this abnormal thinking pattern of many of the medical professionals today.

  • When general practitioners want to have control of their patients even after referring them to big tertiary care centres.
  • This is being encouraged  by the corporate desk of big hospitals as they probably send financial benefits to the referring doctors. Hence doctors are worried their property may get lost during  transit or inside the  big hospital. There are instances , I  have witnessed , where severe mitral stenosis are manged medically by some established physicians fearing that their property will be lost .
  • Patients with severe angina are not offered angiogram and remain on medical treatment fearing loss of monthly consultation fees.
  • When the care takers energy and thought process are consumed in many non academic activates one can expect how the illness can be taken care off.
  • When investigations are ordered the primary referring doctor feels he is being denied of  kick backs from costly investigations which is enjoyed bu the specialists .so these general practices what to finish of all required investigations in their desired lab and sent to the specialist.
  • This has led to  curious  situations  where a  ENT surgeon calls for  a  64  slice CT scan and obstetrician asking  for MRI brain (  because the patient is theirs  ! )  

The sequale is two fold . 

The specialist often gets annoyed  and  feel insulted  to read an investigation  ordered by a  different physician(  rather irrelevant  physician !) done  in a non friendly lab  without incentives.

  1. Either he looks at it reluctantly
  2.  Or orders  fresh investigations

 (Some physicians show   extreme  arrogance ,   as  they call for fresh investigation even if the patient is having    good quality ,    investigations  with  images done recently  !)

Finally , the most dangerous thing

A  patient once admitted  under a  doctor, the  prescriptions and procedures are  often  controlled by the admitting doctor .We  have seen a pathetic situation of plastic surgeon admitting a rheumatic heart disease and trying to manage  with the help of  telephoning consultations with a cardiologist .

There is a  chaotic  discipline  in ordering Investigations and treatment modalities  in our country .Any one can order any thing they want .In this scenerio,  abberrant patient  behavir leads to further  complications as patients  themself  decide what investigations they want.

What is the solution* ?

The concept of family physician is still a best option . It has to be continued. There need to be a proper referral services into well equipped, staffed ,  audited institution in every district and counties either controlled by Government or well-regulated. private bodies . The financial remuneration for the doctors should be constant and fixed irrespective of the form   treatment they provide.

In other words the entire health care delivery  should  be centralised and institutionalised .The need for specialist to be assessed properly and care should be rationed .

                                                           Consider this  anarchic situation –  An   asymptomatic, incidentally  detected  30 %  PDA  lesion in a rich bed ridden ,  old man   is  stented by a  3rd generation drug electing stent in a corporate hospital,  while   many  young  Indians with a productive life  with  critical  left main .proximal LAD   is allowed die in peace .

                                            Where are our medical economists and  health care planners hiding ?  ! And we are talking about billion dollar medical  tourism industry .

A general practitioner  should receive same amount as consultation as a neurosurgeon or cardiologist .If we  divide  the doctor into different grades according to the knowledge  and place of work ,  the lesser doctors  will find someway to equalize their earning with their superior colleagues.

After all , all doctors take the same oath . . .   A  doctor who treats a febrile convulsion in a remote village by administering  a timely diazepam  injection can not be considered unequal    to  a Cleveland neurosurgeon   who clips a AV malformation in the circle  of  Willis to terminate  recurrent convulsion in a similar child .

* One would  tend to  think , these solutions are highly theoretical  not implementable in today’s world.  But trying to bring order to a dysfunctional  medical  care delivery system is not a crime any way !

Final message

Most doctors continue to be noble and dedicated.  But the faith in them is rapidly eroding .This is becoming  a dangerous trend . They can not to be  blamed  in isolation.   It is the dynamics of  social and economic scenario  that  are  driving  the medical profession in a journey towards a  commercial extravaganza , where humane care is  as obsolete as a Mediterranean dinosaur !

Now young doctors are  readily manufactured  in the countryside   (Not my merit  , but  bought as commodities akin to real  estate) . A three bed room flat and a MBBS  seat roughly  costs equal in India !

There is  no wonder then  , doctors will treat their degrees  and patients  as  precious   property . Nothing wrong to consider  them as their property ,  but let them handle the property with at most concern , faith and trust !

Disclaimer *This  article does not intend to  defame any doctor or medical profession . It aims to  encourage a wider debate on the issue  . This is  about  many physicians which we come across everyday   in  our  towns and cities  .This article may be irrelevant in  many  other  countries and  to those physicians working in a completely institutionalised  health care delivery system  including  Govt .hospitals where the collective care (or is it collective no care ?)  is the norm .

Read Full Post »

« Newer Posts - Older Posts »