Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for the ‘Cardiology -unresolved questions’ Category

  1. Do 64slice MDCT  in all patients who has  a coronary event and follow it up with catheter based CAG.
  2. Use liberally the new biochemical marker ,  serum  B-naturetic peptide (BNP) to diagnose cardiac failure in lieu of basal auscultation.
  3. Advice  cardiac resynchronisation therapy in all patients  who are in class 4 cardiac failure with a wide qrs complex .
  4. As it is may be considered a  crime to administer empirical  heparin, do ventilation perfusion scan in all cases with suspected pulmonary embolism.
  5. Do serial CPK MB and troponin levels in all patients with well  established  STEMI .
  6. Open up all occluded coronary arteries irrespective  of symptoms and muscle viability.
  7. Consider  ablation of pulmonary veins as an  initial strategy in  patients with recurrent idiopathic AF. If it is not feasible  atleast occlude their left atrial appendage with watch man  device.
  8. Never tell  your patients   the  truths  about the  diet , exercise &  lifestyle modification (That can  cure most of the early hypertension) . Instead encourage the  use of  newest ARBs  or even  try direct renin antoagonists   to treat all those patients in  stage 1 hypertension.
  9. Avoid regular heparin in acute coronary syndromes   as  it  is a disgrace to use it  in today’s world. Replace all prescription of heparin with  enoxaparine  or  still better ,  fondaparinux  whenever  possible.
  10. Finally never discharge  a  heftily  insured patient   until  he completes all the  cardiology investigations  that are available in your hospital  .

Coming soon :  10 more ways to  increase cost of cardiology care . . .beyond common man’s reach

Read Full Post »

The term cardiomyopathy generally denotes a  progressive disease  in clinical cardiology.There was a time   diagnosis  of dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM )  was synonymous with a  delayed death sentence !  Of course , the situation has vastly improved over the years  with the availability of  new medical , interventional and surgical management. Still ,  there is no denying the  fact  ,  DCM continues to  have a grave outcome  especially when it occurs without any identifiable cause .

While we have  variety of aggressive DCMs , we also  have  patients with relatively benign forms of   dilated and dysfunctional hearts  which recover totally .

This reversible forms of DCM is observed in  the following  situations.

Hypertensive dilated cardiomyopathy . The left ventricle  in  some of the  patients with severe SHT  respond to the stress (Increased  after load) by dilatation rather than hypertrophy. This is especially common after an episode of LVF.  If we do an acute echocardiogram the LV function is severely impaired and the LV may  also be dilated. With good control of BP and fluid management the ventricle promptly return  to it’s baseline dimension. The recovery is complete in many . (The mechansim of LV dysfunction acute severe Hypertension is referred to as Pre-load /After load mismatch) Link to concept of Pre load mismatch .

* Note in the past these entities were not called as  cardiomyopathy .

Peri partum cardiomyopathy.

This is a serious disorder of cardiac muscles that occur during pregnancy  few months before  or few months after delivery  . There is correlation between PIH and this entity. Prognosis varies between very bad to excellent. Very few cardiac entities  have a  natural history like this one disease of women.Most of the pregnant women regain their original cardiac status within  year or so. It should be recalled there is high chances of recurrence in next pregnancy.

Alcoholic cardiomyopathy.

The toxic response to alcohol or the additive cobalt can result in DCM .There is overlap  between holiday heart syndrome and alcoholic DCM , where atrial fibrillation is the major problem. Wet Beri beri is the advamced form of clinical DCM that respond to vitamin B therapy.

Tachycardic cardiomyopathy.

This is also a common entity that occur during persistent sinus tachycardia or AF , thyrotoxicosis.Beta blockers are  of great use here.  Recovery is usual if the primary cause is correctable.

Toxic and drug related  reversible LV dysfunction

Adriamycin cardiomyopathy

Tako -Subot  Cardiomyopathy canbe termed as classic form of reversible  stress cardiomyopathy

Miscellaneous conditions

Diabetes and chronic kidney disorders are known to have a reversible form of cardiomyopathy

Some rare toxins  , scorpion envenomation , selenium deficiency can result in reversible DCM

**Ischemic DCM are partially  correctable in many , still  we don’t include it as cause for reversible DCM

*** Many episodes of acute myocarditis can have transient or short term LV dialtation and  dysfunction.they are classified as myocarditis .But there is little  difference (Except acadmeic . . .)  between chronic myocarditis with LV dysfucntion  and cardiomyopathy.

Read Full Post »

10.14prescriptionRXStatins are projected to be  the saviours of human race against the  killer atherosclerosis .Now we have reached a stage  soon ,  where every healthy individual may be administered this drug. There are consistent evidence for statins to reduce , retard , prevent progression of existing atheroscelorosis  and possibly prevent future atherosclerosis.

This  wonder drug acts by blocking the HMG COA enzyme a vital  enzyme that regulates the lipid metabolism within the cells. It is made to appear  as if ,  the  God has  created this enzyme  with the only purpose for human suffering , by blocking this   we  expect  all errors in lipid  metabolism is corrected.

This enzyme is  part of the house keeping  system  that is meant to service the human cellular lipid layers 24hrs a day. If it  is impaired intentionally one can imagine the consequences. That’s what modern science is all about. Luckily God is kind enough the side effects of  blocking this enzyme is seen only in minority. The myopathies that are classically described with statins are due to possible mitochondrial dysfunction .

As the debate still  continues to find the   optimal bottom levels  of LDL  , we have more worries ,  real world experiences have brought us a new issue  namely  the  reduction of HDL with statins. While literature search on statins and HDL  tell  us there is marginal increase in HDL up to 10% the fact is there is marginal fall or significant  fall in many of the patients .

How can this happen ? A  huge difference between real world and trial world ?

statins hdl ldl

* Brands shown  not intentional

Readers are welcome to add their input on this question .

Reference

Visit HDL forum

http://www.hdlforum.org/

Read Full Post »

micro circulation shockHuman circulatory system consists  of  the heart , the arterial  and the venous  systems . Together they constitute the  three important limbs of circulatory system namely , the  pumping, delivering and retrieval systems .In physiological conditions approximately 6 liters of  blood  has to traverse  the entire   circuit every minute . The  purpose of the  circulatory system is not simply circulating the blood within the body,  but  it has to perfuse different vital organs like brain, kidney, liver . Of course ,   the heart has to self perfuse the coronaries  by it’s own contraction.The organ perfusion is determined by local and systemic  regulatory mechanism. A gamut of intrinsic and extrinsic neuro humoral modulators take up this job. A functionally intact autonomic nervous system is an absolute necessity to maintain tissue perfusion.  The perfusion pressure is highly variable in different organs and different cells. Similarly the ability to with stand ischemia and hypoxia also varies. Shock  is a general term used to imply ,  circulation is seriously compromised.Here we will confine our self  to the intricacies of peripheral circulatory shock

Traditionally shock is  classified as

  1. Cardiogenic shock
  2. Hypovolemic shock
  3. Vasodilatory /Redistributive/Septic /Warm shock (Can be called  as  arterial shock )

The hemodynamics of the first two are straight forward and easily understood. In  cardiogenic shock , the pumping action of heart is primarily affected .In hypovolemic shock  there is no  structural defect in any of the   circulatory limbs but there is  a loading defect due to low blood  volume as in hemorhagic shock .

The term vasodilatory shock or redistributive shock is most poorly understood and most difficult to treat.

The  concept is further confounded as  combinations of   above three mechanism in a same a pateint can occur . ( More commoner than we believe !) . An example could be a septic patient  with an  internal bleed and myocardial  depression either due to preexisting LV dysfunction or circulating toxins.

Since  we have always perceived heart as  the  sole  vital  component of circulatory   system , our understanding of the role of the vascular tree which is primarily responsible for delivering the blood is largely undermined and neglected. We are always happy if the EF %  is normal.

Classical features of  circulatory failure ?

The cardiac contraction is good.This is documented by normally contracting LV by echocardiography. The pulmonary capillary wedge pressure is normal (<12mmhg).Still the patient is in  hypotension with  evidence for vital organ under perfusion like oliguria and reduced mentation.

What is vascular tone ? What sustains  the flow of blood into the tissues  ?

The entire  vascular tree could form a   few 100 kilometer length.(Capillary /arterioles /venules included). While , it is easy to  percieve heart as  a dynamic pumping organ ,  it is a less recognised fact the entire vascular tree is also  pulsating  to every beat. That is the rhythm of life. What makes the vascular tree to pulsate ? Apart from  contraction of the heart  , there is an  intrinsic tone for the large , small arteries and the arterioles and veins  .This tone is vital for pushing the bllood into various organs and return into venous circulation and subsequently back into the heart.

microcirculation shock cardiogenic septic

The  millions of perivascular cuffings and the artreriolar smooth muscles  can be considered as  small micro pumping stations situated along side every cell.

It is very important to emphasize here,   if  tone in these microcirculation is less than optimal , the patient’s circulatory  system can never complete the desired circuit  even if the heart has 75% EF . This exactly is happening in circulatory shock . The vascular tree fails to accept and return the pumped blood  in timely fashion.

What controls this tone ?

It is chiefly under the control of autonomic nervous system.The endogenous vasoconstrictors , the adrenergic nervous system, the endothelins , the angoitensins constrict the vascular smmoth muscles while endothelial relaxing factors ,( EDRF -nitric oxide relaxes it ). There is a delicate balance between these forces.

A cardiovascular health of a person is not simply having a healthy heart , he has to have a healthy vascular system with intact biological activity.The fact that , not every one with sepsis react with poor vascular tone indicate inherent capacity to neutralise toxic vasodilatory neuro transmitters.

Is there a invisible parameter called vascular ejection fraction  in circulatory  system?

Yes. It must be . We rarely discuss it . The vascular tree has an important role for pumping the blood into the tissues.  It needs micro manometers to assess the systolic and diastolic dimensions of small arteries and arterioles . But  what  we know is ,  it is grossly impaired in circulatory failure.The vessels especially the arteriolar smooth muscles which determine the perfusion pressure of cells go into state of permanent relaxation. The vascular smooth muscles lose control from autonomic innervation and become flabby. It is the   DCM equivalent for blood vessels. The arterioles no longer regulate blood flow and fluids get sequestrated in various viscera,( often called thrid spaces) and organ dysfucntion sets in. The resultant hypoxia aggarvates the tissue stagnation by producing still unnamed vasodialtory mediators.

What are the pharmocological approches to increase the vascular tone of a failing vascular tree ?

It is a very difficult problem even in this modern era of vascular medcine. Once set in ,  these patients invariably go downhill .The primary underlying problem  ,  often sepsis  need to be corrected. Usually these  patients need multi organ support.Vasoconstrictors like epinephrine,nor epinephrine , dopamine  can sustain vasoconstriction temporarily . As we know the vascualr smooth msucles can not be kept on this assited contrection mode for long.It is bound to fail .Patients native autonomic function has to recover fast to wean of this support.

What is normal circualtorty time .How is it altered in circualtory failure  ?

The normal circualtory time is 15-20 seconds.It is many times prolonged in circualtory failure inspite of the cardiac contraction being normal

What is effective circulatory volume ?

The body fluid compartment is divided into ICF,ECF & interstitial  spaces.At a given time , the fluid in the extracellular space  can only  take  part  in circulation. A good blood pressure does not always mean a good tissue perusion why ? This is very important to realise as blood pool has to dynamically exchange with intra cellullar compartment. At times of shock the blood can bye- pass the cells through the alternate circuits in the periphery of micro circulation. So what is circulating in the system may not be taking part in tissue perfusion .This is the concept of  effective circulatory volume.This is especially noted in hepatic shocks and in some terminally ill malignancy.

Is there a venous shock syndrome ?

Cardiologists  often show a  step motherly  attitude to venous disorders. In fact many  of the   cardiovascular  specialists   think their   job is  taking care of  heart ( Of course , a little bit of aorta and venacava !) .It is surprising  to know,  there is little  scientific data on determinants  venular and venous tone (Both small and large veins).

The power of venous system should not be under estimated  as it pumps  many litres of blood every minute  defying gravity ! For this to happen it needs a vigorous tone .Where do it get from ?  : The same  autonomic nervous system that controls the heart. Remember , in pathological states there is a  great chance for this to go out of control. So venous shock is a clinically distinct possibility. In fact inappropriate administration of nitrates which reduces the venous tone has resulted in many adverse events in RV shock.

In a patient with circulatory shock , we would  never know  how much is contributed by venous side and how much by arterial side .This is important as in circulatory shock we administer all vital drugs through veins.Now it is thought  systemic venous  dysfunction also contribute to shock state.

Clinical situations of circulatory failure or shock

Bacterial shocks

  • Gram negative sepsis
  • Staphylococcal shock

Viral shocks

Dengue/Swine flu etc

Others*

  • Dissiminated intravascular coagulation
  • ARDShypoxic shock
  • Elderly,Diabetic  autonomic neuropathy
  • Persistent post operative hypotension due to silent autonomic neuropathy.
  • Some cases of Spinal shock
  • Toxins – Scorpion etc(Intense vasoconstrictive shock )
  • Terminal shock in liver failure/Hepato pulmonary   syndrome

* Idiopathic unexplained persistent hypotension , with difficulty to wean off from vasoconstrictive agents is a commonly encountered problem in any intensive care unit.The exact mechanism is not known.When we are not clear about the mechanism  we  generally blame it on the  the autonomic nervous system !

How common is the mixed shock syndrome ?

This is more common than we realise .The classical description of multisystem failure is a direct consequence of this.

Can a cardiogenic shock transform into a peripheral circulatory shock ?

Such a scenario is  possible  .A  resuscitated cardiac arrest may end up with a recovered heart but a loss of vascular tone  possibly due to hypoxic vascular damage. .Many times cardiac patients are kept (Post PCI/CABG ) on large doses of  vasoconstrictors or IABP that can induce  tachyphylaxis. It may result in difficulty in weaning these drugs.

How can circulatory shock result compromised cardiac function ?

The common effect of any shock is  reduced organ perfusion.So even in peripheral shock , the coronary blood flow gets compromised especially if these patients have a silent coronary lesions which are otherwise not significant , becomes sites of hemodynamic hurdles during hypotension.This may result in global contractile dysfunction, or a coronary event.

What is vasoconstrictive shock ?

Epinephrine and nor epinephrine are  very potent  vasoconstrictors .If levels of these becomes excessively high , the blood vessels go in for sustained spastic state that can impair the micro circulation .Some times  this results  in a  good blood pressure in the major vessels but severely compromised tissue perfusion.This particular situation has been reported after scorpion envenomation , and in  rare cases of pheochromocytoma .

Final message

Primary circulatory failure or shock (With largely intact cardiac function without hypovolemia) is a common problem in critically ill.  The entire  macro and micro vascular tree goes for a  stunning reaction and  goes for  a sleep in a  semi dilated  state  . It can  be termed as  Arterial  or Arteriolar   shock. Contrary to  all those hi-tech   mechanical stuff for supporting a failing heart (LV assist, Impalla, Abiomed , ) the available options are very little here  . The response to vasoconstrictive agents are  also unpredictable. Correcting the multi organ failure  and targeting the primary cause  is the only hope.

Read Full Post »

Fundamental principle  of  human biological system is to live in harmony with nature and environment.Each cell  has a unique reaction  when it comes into contact with  external  material. This reaction can be acute or chronic  ,   local or systemic. The most severe form of allergy is called anaphylaxis  that can result in instantaneous loss of life. There  is a whole gamut of disorders  that  resulted  in a  separate  speciality called allergic medicine .

Further ,the transplantation  science have   taught us  an  organ or cell can be rejected at any point of time after implantation (Hyperacute -chronic) .With advancement of science we have started implanting a variety of devices  with complex metallurgy ,inside human body, metal clips, prosthesis, valves, wires, etc .How the body handles them .The consequences can be a mild reaction to major ones occasionally.

Consider ,a local allergy due to a orthopedic prosthesis  in one of the leg bones  is far less serious than a metal within a coronary artery  irritating the intima .

Remember hypersensitivity reactions can be severe . This lady reacted  like this to a sandal slipper -A  fiery red  infiltration

contact dermatits stent allergy pci coronary

Imagine  if a stented coronary artery react like this what would be the possible consequence ?

In susceptible  individuals  , can a metal cause

  • Intimal hyperemia
  • Intimal induration
  • Intimo-medial edema  following stent deployment

pci stent coronary angiogram thrombosis des

Why drug eluting stents are more prone for hypersensitivity ?

The answer is simple , while metal allergy is a comparatively rare phenomenon, the drugs we  coat and the polymers used are  many fold likely to result in hypersensitivity reaction.

While  the world is worried  more  about penicillin , sulpha allergy which occurs in 1 in 100000 ,  we tend to ignore the metal and drug  reactions within  the tender coronary arteries.

stent des rejection virmani  pci

What is  the clinical expression of  stent hypersensitivity ?

It is  often a coronary event in the acute phase and restenosis in chronic phase.

How much of acute stent thrombosis is related to stent allergy mediated reaction ?

The exact incidence  will  never be known. It could be high. Whenever a sudden unexpected early stent occlusion can be a suspect .

Is stent allergy a local reaction or systemic reaction ?

It is most often local .The drugs the stent elute can elicit a systemic reaction occasionally.

So what can be done to prevent this complication ?

Drug companies in it’s  package regularly  include the warning  message ! What does it imply to have a caution  on the covers ? .This warning simply represent about our ignorance in this issue. We presume it is a minor problem.

pci stent thrombosis stent allergy metal

Questions unanswered

  1. How does a cardiac patient knows whether he is hypersensitive to stainless steel or nickel ?
  2. Is it practical to have a stent allergic test in every patient before PCI ?
  3. Is routine administration of corticosteroids for few days after PCI an answer ?

Reference

R.Virmani , circulation 2004

http://circ.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/full/109/6/701?maxtoshow=&HITS=10&hits=10&RESULTFORMAT=&fulltext=stent+%27allergy%22+&searchid=1&FIRSTINDEX=0&resourcetype=HWCIT

Read Full Post »

Myocardial infarction (STEMI)  occurs in two distinct arterial  territories .The anterior LAD circulation and postero- inferior RCA/LCX circulation.The incidence is equally shared.

There has been some  learned and unlearned perceptions about Inferior MI.

Inferior MI is less dangerous than anterior MI.  True or false ?

Answer: Essentially true in most situations.

Reasons.

Inferior wall of the heart (strictly speaking there is no walls for heart , only surfaces , which blends with adjacent areas)  inferior wall  is formed by diaphragmatic surface and posterior surface.Inferior MI can occur by either RCA or LCX obstruction.The outcome of inferior MI is determined by mainly by  the extent  of   LV myocardial   damage it inflicts.To  quantitate this  we need to know , how much of LV is supplied by RCA , or LCX or combination of both ? This depend on the coronary dominance .It is estimated , the bulk of the LV is supplied ( up to 75%  ) by LCA. This becomes further high in left dominant circulations . In fact , it is believed LV can never get involved in non dominant RCA occlusions. This has brought in a new terminology  called “Small inferior MI”.Inferior STEMI due to PDA  occlusion or in a co -dominant circulation is not yet studied

Apart from the above  anatomical considerations the following clinical observations  have  been made regarding inferior MI.

  • When thrombolysis was introduced , many studies  suggested the the ST elevation in inferior  leads toched the isolectric levels  in most situations even without thrombolysis.Technically, this implies spontaneous , successful thrombolysis are more common in RCA. Among the thrombolysed ,persistent ST elvation is a rare phenomenon.
  • The well known difference in the conduction defect between anterior and inferior MI  is an important contibutor for better outcome in the later.(AV blocks in inferior MI , are often transient, non progressive, supra hisian location rarely require permanent pacemakers)
  • During acute phase cardiogenic shock occurs in a minority (That too , only if RV shock is included )
  • Even in the follow up the ejection fraction in inferior MI is  almost always above  40%. In many EF is not affected at all.
  • Progressive adverse remodelling of LV is rare

When can Inferior MI be dangerous ?

Anatomical factors

Inspite of the  above  factors  inferior MI can not be taken lightly . Especially when it  extend into posterior, lateral , (Rarely anterior) segments.

While  posterior extension  is often  tolerated , lateral extension is very poorly tolerated .This is probably explained as  the extension involves the vital free wall of LV and the laplace forces could precipitate LVF. Free wall rupture is also common in this situation.

Posterior extension , predominantly involves the surface of RV which is less important hemodynamically. Of course incidence of MR  due to it’s effect on posterior mitral leaflet can be trouble some.

inferior MI ECG

High risk clinical catagories.

Out of hospital STEMI  are at  equal  risk irrespective of the territories involved  .This is because,  primary VF does not differentiate , whether  ischemia comes from RCA or LAD .

  1. In elderly , dibetics and co existing medical condtions  the the established  benign   character  of  inferior MI disappear, as  any  muscle loss  in LV has equally adverse outcome.
  2. Even though  inferior MIs are immune  to cardiogenic shock  , a equally worrisome  prolonged hypotension due to high vagal tone, bradycardia, plus or minus RVMI can create trouble. Fortunately , they respond better to  treatment. Except a few with extensive transmural RVMI outcome is good.
  3. Presence of  mechanical complications of  ventricular septal rupture , ischemic MR can bring  the mortality on par with large anterior MI.

How different is the clinical outcome of infero-posterior  MI with reference  to the  site of  coronary arterial  obstruction   ?

The sequence of  outcome  From  best to worse  : Non dominant RCA* → Dominant RCA but distal to RV branch → LCX dominant with large OMs

* It is believed   an  acute proximal  obstruction of a  non dominant RCA may not be mechanically significant, but can be electrically significant as it retains the risk of primary VF and SA nodal ischemia. The ECG changes  can be very minimal or  some times simple bradycardia is the only clue. One should be able to recognise this entity (Non dominant  RCA STEMI)  as the outcome is  excellent and these patients  would never require procedure like primary  PCI

** A inferior MI due to a dominant LCX and a large OMs have comparable outcome as that of extensive anterior MI. The ECG will reveal ST elevation in both inferior and lateral leads.

***In patients with prior CAD  and collateral dependent  multivessel disease  the  inferior anterior sub classification does not make much sense as  entire coronary circulation can be mutually interdependent.

Final message

Inferior STEMI  generally lacks the vigor  to cause extensive damage to myocardium in most situations .Further they respond better to treatment. Risk stratification of STEMI based on the location of MI has not been popular among mainstream cardiologists. This issue needs some introspection as  the costly and complex treatment modalities like primary PCI  is unwarranted in most of the low risk inferior MIs.

Related posts in my blog:

1.Why thrombolysis is more effective in RCA?

Read Full Post »

Total coronary artery occlusion is a common finding in CAD  especially in chronic stable angina. Normal coronary blood flow is 5 % of cardiac output  that amounts to 250-300ml/mt.At an average  heart rate of  70/mt  , each  beat  injects  about 5cc blood into the coronary circulation.This is shared between two coronary arteries.  This means , only few CC (2-3cc) of blood enters  each coronary artery with each cardiac cycle .

When one of coronary artery is totally occluded what happens to the coronary

blood flow ?

A.Total coronary blood flow  can be be  maintained   normal  at rest  as it  forms  only about 5% of cardiac output  (or it is only  slightly reduced )

B. It is believed , the unobstructed coronary artery  could receive the blood meant for the contralateral coronary artery. This  possibly explains the increased coronary artery diameter in the non obstructed artery.

C. It’s nature’s wish ,  that the  contralateral  coronary artery  shall share  50% of  it’s  blood through  collaterals if available.

D.If collaterals are not formed it , the unobstructed coronary  artery  may be over perfused with double the amount  of blood flow.

E. Some times , the collaterals steal  much more than what  the  obstructed coronary artery  deserves and make the feeding coronary artery ischemic. This is many times observed in  total RCA occlusion with well formed  collaterals  from LAD/LCX.

F.The collateral flow  in CTO also depend on whether flow is directed from LAD system to RCA or from RCA -LAD system. The LAD is better placed to assist RCA than vice versa.This is for two reasons.1.LAD blood flow is higher than RCA so it can share it.2.The driving pressure is more  from LAD -RCA , as RCA can receive  blood flow even during diastole .

F.During exertion , the coronary hemodynamics become further complex.The collateral’s are traditionally thought to be less than adequate during times of exercise.But it is more of a perception than solid scientific data.This rule  may be applicable in only certain group of patients. We know CTO patients with very good exercise tolerance who have documented collateral’s.

G.Collaterals can be either  visible or invisible by CAG. The strength of collateral circulation is not in it’s visibility but it’s capacity to dilate and  respond to neuro humoral mediators at times of  demand.  Currently  , there is lot to be desired  regarding  our knowledge about  the physiology  of visible collaterals , no need to  mention about invisible collaterals !

Final message

The above statements  are based  on logics and observations .

Is it not a  irony  in cardiac literature ,  where  thousands of articles  are coming out every month  to tackle  totally occluded coronary artery(CTOs) ,  there is  very little data   regarding the coronary hemodynamics in chronic total occlusion .   How  does a patient with CTO can manage a active life with only one functioning  coronary artery ?

Read Full Post »

Thrombolytic therapy ,  has been  the specific treatment  for STEMI for  many decades. Primary PCI*  is  shown to be  superior  than  thrombolysis  if   performed   early  by an experienced  team in a dedicated facility. (*Conditions apply). It is estimated ,   currently only a  a fraction  STEMI  population get primary PCI (<5%) in ideal conditions . Another fraction , get  primary PCI by inexperienced cardiologists  in low volume centres.

So , thrombolysis   remains, and  would continue to remain ,   the    primary  mode of therapy for STEMI  in the  present and near  future !

How do you assess the successful  thrombolysis ?

It should be recognised ,  there is a fundametal flaw in this  question !

The aim of thrombolytic therapy is  not  to   lyse  the thrombus  , but also  to restore the coronary blood flow to the  myocardium – also called reperfusion . One may wonder , why the term ,  thrombolysis  should ‘t be  used interchangeably with reperfusion. 

A successful thrombolysis  never guarantees  a good reperfusion , for the simple reason ,  distal blood flow in an  obstructed coronary artery  is dependent on ,  many factors  other than relief of obstruction.

Apart from the potency of drug,     other   important factors  that determine  successful  lysis &  reperfusion are  . . .

  • Timing of opening of artery , if the thrombolysis is delayed  ,  the distal myocardium is dead , and   it won’t allow blood flow to enter the mycardium.
  • Microvascular integrity is as vital as epicardial vessels.
  • Distal microvascualture  plugging by the thrombotic debri . This is called”no reflow “

So , we should  primarily assess myocardial reperfusion rather than epicardial thrombolyis ! following thrombolysis .

What are the parameters available to assess successful reperfusion /thrombolyis?

  1. Clinical : Relief from chest  pain. Angina relief  , though subjective is an indication for adequate reperfusion of ischemic myocardium.
  2. ECG-ST segment regression > 50%
  3. Cardiac enzymes: Early flushing of  intra myocytic CPK into systemic circulation and hence early peaking of CPK MB (<1ohours instead of 24h)
  4. Reperfusion arrhythmias(AIVR-Less specific) .Primary VF is now thought to be reperfusion related.
  5. Infract related artery(IRA) patency by coronary angiogram
  6. Distal TIMI flow/ myocardial blush score/ TIMI frame count

ECG ST regression ,  is a direct indicator  myocardial reperfusion   as the ST segment shifts  towards baseline ,  implies  of infarct current of injury . ST regression almost always correlate with good  recovery of LV function  in STEMI .

IRA patency , is an epicardial index , it  does not give information about myocardial blood flow . But ,  a good  distal TIMI flow generally indicates good reperfusion.This  again ,  is  not a fool proof  index,  as even many of the TIMI 3 flow patients  have severely damaged myocardium by echocardiography .

Final message

For the above reasons, one should always  make a distinction between successful lysis and successful reperfusion . Surprisingly ,  ECG  is  the gold standard for assessing successful reperfusion of myocardium ,  while CAG tell us  about epicardial patency and possibly reperfusion also.

Read Full Post »

Apart from  acute  coronary syndrome,    cardiac  failure is   the most common clinical  presentation of  CAD. Cardiac failure ,  classically present with dyspnea on rest or on exertion , while angina is the dominant presentation in ACS.  

What if  ,  both these  occur together in an acute fashion ?

Yesif it occurs  together it is called ischemic cardiac failure . Fortunately , this is quiet uncommon . It has   an adverse outcome,  especially if it occurs  as a companion of NSTEMI . Let us see how . . .(  Most of the episodes of cardiac failure  in CAD  means only  LV failure )

For cardiac failure to occur , there need to be a mechanical contractile dysfunction or defect . In CAD population , this can  occur in  one of the following way.

  • Loss of LV muscle (Acute  Myocardial infarction as in STEMI)
  • Mechanical defects (Mitral regurgitation/VSR etc)
  • An arrhythmia (Commonly VT or AF / CHB )  can precipitate  cardiac failure

Apart from these three , there is  an important mechanism of acute LVF, namely ischemic stunning of major part of LV resulting in severe mechanical dysfucntion.This is a dangerous form of cardiac failure (Pathologivcclaly it is thought to represent  contraction  band necrosis !) this occurs in global ischemic situations manifested as gross global ST depression.

So,  there are two types of  ischemic LVF  .  STEMI   occuring due to infarct( ± ischemia ) Other  one (NSTEMI)entirely due to ischemia.

Logically ,  one  may n’t   refer  STEMI related LVF as  ischemic LVF at all  , as infarct has already occured. While , NSTEMI related LV could be the ” True ischemic LVF “


What are the differences between cardiac failure that occur in  STEMI and NSTEMI ?


lvf in nstemi stemi

Is post infarct failure  ( The commonly used terminology  , now out of vogue ! )  a type of ischemic LVF ?

In the strict sense , it is not . Here the dead myocardium , is responsible  for the   failure .To label a  LVF , as  ischemic , ongoing ischemia must  be  documented and further it  should  be shown to  contribute   for the  mechanical dysfunction .

This is of vital importance ,   if you wrongly attribute ischemia  as a cause for  the LVF , the patient may be taken up for emergency  revascularisation .It is not going to help much (Infact , it may  worsen !) as  this cardiac failure is not going to be corrected  .What we require ,  here is an  aggressive medical management  protocol .


Read Full Post »

NSTEMI constitutes a very heterogeneous population .The cardiac risk can vary between very low to very high . In contrast , STEMI patients carry a high risk for electro mechanical complication including sudden death .They all need immediate treatment either with thrombolysis or PCI to open up the blood vessel and salvage the myocardium.

The above concept , may be true in many situations , but what we fail to recognize is that , STEMI also is a heterogeneous clinico pathological with varying risks and outcome !
Let us see briefly , why this is very important in the management of STEMI

Management of STEMI has undergone great change over the past 50 years and it is the standing example of evidence based coronary care in the modern era ! The mortality , in the early era was around 30-40% . The advent of coronary care units, defibrillators, reduced the mortality to around 10-15% in 1960 /70s . Early use of heparin , aspirin further improved the outcome .The inhospital mortality was greatly reduced to a level of 7-8% in the thrombolytic era. And , then came the interventional approach, namely primary PCI , which is now considered the best form of reperfusion when done early by an experienced team.

Inspite of this wealth of evidence for the superiority of PCI , it is only a fraction of STEMI patients get primary PCI even in some of the well equipped centers ( Could be as low as 15 %)

Why ? this paradox

Primary PCI has struggled to establish itself as a global therapeutic concept for STEMI , even after 20 years of it’s introduction (PAMI trial) . If we attribute , lack of infrastructure , expertise are responsible for this low utility of primary PCI , we are mistaken ! There are so many institutions , at least in developing world , reluctant to do primary PCI for varied reasons.( Affordability , support system , odd hours ,and finally perceived fear of untoward complication !)

Primary PCI may be a great treatment modality , but it comes with a inherent risk related to the procedure.

In fact the early hazard could exceed the potential benefit in many of the low risk STEMI patients !

All STEMI’s are not same , so all does not require same treatment !

Common sense and logic would tell us any medical condition should be risk stratified before applying the management protocol. This will enable us to avoid applying “high risk – high benefit” treatments in low risk patients . It is a great surprise, the cardiology community has extensively researched to risk stratify NSTEMI/UA , it has rarely considered risk stratification of STEMI before starting the treatment.

In this context , it should be emphasized most of the clinical trails on primary PCI do not address the clinical relevance and the differential outcomes in various subsets of STEMI .

Consider the following two cases.

Two young men with STEMI , both present within 3 hours after onset of symptoms

  1. ST elevation in V1 -V6 , 1 , AVL , Low blood pressure , with severe chest pain.
  2. ST elevation in 2 ,3, AVF , hemodynamically stable , with minimal or no discomfort .

In the above example, a small inferior MI by a distal RCA occlusion , and a proximal LAD lesion jeopardising entire anterior wall , both are categorized as STEMI !
Do you want to advocate same treatment for both ? or Will you risk stratify the STEMI and treat individually ? (As we do in NSTEMI !)

Current guidelines , would suggest PCI for both situations. But , logistic , and real world experience would clearly favor thrombolysis for the second patient .
Does that mean, the second patient is getting an inferior modality of treatment ?

Not at all . In fact there is a strong case for PCI being inferior in these patients as the risk of the procedure may far outweigh the benefit especially if it is done on a random basis by not so well experienced cath lab team.
(Note : Streptokinase or TPA does not vary it’s action , whether given by an ambulance drive or a staff nurse or even a cardiologist ! .In contrast , the infrastructure and expertise have the greatest impact on the success and failure of PCI )
Final message

So , it is argued the world cardiology societies(ACC/ESC etc) need to risk stratify STEMI (Like we do in NSTEMI ) into low risk, intermediate risk and high risk categories and advice primary PCI only for high risk patients.

Reference

https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamainternalmedicine/fullarticle/226907

Read Full Post »

« Newer Posts - Older Posts »